In the present investigation, the authors provide internal consistency reliabilities for Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) subtest and Index discrepancy scores using the standardization sample as the data source. Reliabilities ranged from .55 to .88 for subtest discrepancy scores and .80 to .91for Index discrepancy scores. Thus, the reliabilities of the WAIS-IV subtest discrepancy scores did not reach the ≥ .90 criterion recommended for clinical decision-making, whereas four Index score coefficients reached this reliability standard. If the purpose is to generate hypotheses based on discrepancy scores, 23 of the 66 subtests and all of the Index reliabilities are ≥ .80.
Brown, K.I., & Ryan, J.J. ( 2004). Reliabilities of the WAIS-III for discrepancy scores: Generalization to a clinical sample. Psychological Reports , 95, 914-916.
2.
Charter, R.A. ( 1999). Testing for true score differences using the confidence interval method. Psychological Reports, 85, 808.
3.
Charter, R.A. ( 2001). Discrepancy scores of reliabilities of the WAIS-III. Psychological Reports, 89, 453-456.
4.
Charter, R.A. ( 2002). Reliability of the WMS-III discrepancy comparisons. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 94, 387-390.
5.
Charter, R.A., & Feldt, L.S. ( 2009). A comprehensive approach to the interpretation of difference scores. Applied Neuropsychology, 16, 23-30.
6.
Detterman, D.K., & Daniel, M.H. ( 1989). Correlations of mental tests with each other and with cognitive variables are highest for low IQ groups. Intelligence , 13, 349-359.
7.
Glass, L.A., Ryan, J.J., Charter, R.A., & Bartels, J.M. ( 2009). Discrepancy score reliabilities in the WISC-IV standardization sample. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27, 138-144.
8.
Guilford, J.P., & Fruchter, B. ( 1978). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education (6th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
McDermott, P.A., Fantuzzo, J.W., & Glutting, J.J. (1990). Just say no to subtest analysis: A critique of Wechsler theory and practice. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 290-302.
12.
Ponterotto, J.G., & Ruckdeschel, D.E. (2007). An overview of coefficient alpha and a reliability matrix for estimating adequacy of internal consistency coefficients with psychological research measures. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 105, 997-1014.
13.
Ryan, J.J., & Brown, K.I. ( 2005). Enhancing the clinical utility of the WASI: Reliabilities of discrepancy scores and supplemental tables for profile analysis. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 140-145.
14.
Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J. ( 1988). Assessment in special and remedial education (4th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
15.
Sattler, J.M. ( 2008). Assessment of children: Cognitive foundations (5th ed.). La Mesa, CA: Jerome M. Sattler, Publisher.
16.
Sattler, J.M., & Ryan, J.J. ( 2009). Assessment with the WAIS-IV. La Mesa, CA: Jerome M. Sattler, Publisher.
17.
The Psychological Corporation. (1999). WASI: Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. San Antonio, TX: Author.
18.
Thorndike, R.L., & Hagen, E. ( 1969). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
19.
Watkins, M.W. ( 2003). IQ subtest analysis: Clinical acumen or clinical illusion ? The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice, 2, 118-141.
20.
Wechsler, D. ( 1997a). WAIS-III administration and scoring manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
21.
Wechsler, D. ( 1997b). Wechsler Memory Scale (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
22.
Wechsler, D. ( 2003). WISC-IV administration and scoring manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
23.
Wechsler, D. ( 2008a). WAIS-IV administration and scoring manual. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
24.
Wechsler, D. ( 2008b). WISC-IV technical and interpretive manual. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
