Classification,Seriation,and Counting in Grades 1,2,and 3 as Two-Year Longitudinal Predictors for Low Achieving in Numerical Facility and Arithmetical Achievement?
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2009
Classification,Seriation,and Counting in Grades 1,2,and 3 as Two-Year Longitudinal Predictors for Low Achieving in Numerical Facility and Arithmetical Achievement?
Previous research stresses the importance of seriation, classification, and counting abilities that should be assessed in kindergarten, when looking for crucial predictors of mathematical learning disabilities in Grade 1. This study examines (n = 158) two-year-long predictive relationships between children's seriation, classification, procedural counting knowledge, and conceptual counting knowledge, and their numerical facility and arithmetical achievement in Grades 3, 4, and 5. Path analyses reveal a relationship between procedural counting knowledge in Grades l and 3 and numerical facility, and between conceptual counting knowledge in Grade l and arithmetical achievement in Grades 1 and 2. In addition, procedural counting knowledge correlates with seriation, and conceptual counting knowledge correlates with classification as well as with seriation in Grade 1. Clinicians are encouraged to select early arithmetic subtests with caution when assessing and predicting arithmetic and arithmetical disabilities.
Aubrey, C., & Godfrey, R. (2003). The development of children's early numeracy through key stage 1. British Educational Research Journal, 29, 821-840.
2.
Aunola, K., Leskinen, E., Lerkkanen, M., & Nurmi, J. (2004). Developmental dynamics of math performance to Grade 2. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 699-713.
3.
Baudonck, M., Debusschere, A., Dewulf, B., Samyn, F., Vercaemst, V., & Desoete, A. (2006). De Kortrijkse Rekentest-Revision [The Kortrijk Arithmetic Test-Revision]. Kortrijk, Belgium: CAR Overleie.
4.
Barrouillet, P., & Lepine, R. (2005). Working memory and children's use of retrieval to solve addition problems. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 91, 183-204.
5.
Cahan, S., Greenbaum, C., Artman, L., Deluya, N., & Gappel-Gilon, Y. (2008). The differential effects of age and first grade schooling on the development of infralogical and logico-mathematical concrete operations. Cognitive Development, 23, 258-277.
6.
Coleman, M.R., Buysse, V., & Neitzel, J. (2006). Recognition and response: An early intervening system for young children at-risk for learning disabilities: Research synthesis and recommendations. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, FPG Child Development Institute.
7.
Desoete, A. (2006). Validiteitsonderzoek met de TEDI-MATH [Validity research on the TEDI-MATH]. Diagnostiek-wijzer, 9, 140-157.
8.
Desoete, A., & Grégoire, J. (2007). Numerical competence in young children and in children with mathematics learning disabilities. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 351-367.
9.
De Vos, T. (1992). Tempotest rekenen [Arithmetic Tempo Test]. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
10.
DiPerna, J.C., Lei, P.-W., & Reid, E.E. (2007). Kindergarten predictors of mathematical growth in the primary grades: An investigation using the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Kindergarten Cohort. Journal of Educational Psychology , 99, 369-379.
11.
Dowker, A. (2005). Individual differences in arithmetic: Implications for psychology, neuroscience and education. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
12.
Dumont, J.J. (1994). Leerstoornissen: I. Theorie en model (nieuwe uitgave) [Learning disabilities: I. Theory and model (new edition)]. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Lemniscaat.
13.
Fuson, K.C. (1988). Children's counting and concepts of number. New York: Springer-Verlag.
14.
Geary, D.C., & Hoard, M.K. (2005). Learning disabilities in arithmetic and mathematics: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 253-268). New York: Psychology Press.
15.
Geary, D.C., Hoard, M.K., & Byrd-Craven, J. (2004). Strategy choices in simple and complex addition: Contributions of working memory and counting knowledge for children with mathematical disability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88, 121-151.
16.
Gersten, R., Jordan, N.C., & Flojo, J.E. (2005). Early identification and intervention for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 38, 293-304.
17.
Grégoire, J. (2005). Développement logique et compétences arithmetiques. Le modèle Piagétien est-il toujours actuel? [Logical development and arithmetic skills. Is the Piagetian model still up to date?] In M. Crahay, L. Verschaffel, E. De Corte, & J. Grégoire (Eds.) Enseignement et apprentissage des mathématiques (pp. 57-77). Brussels: De Boeck.
18.
Grégore, J., Van Nieuwenhoven, C., & Noel, M. (2004). TEDI-MATH [Flemish adaptation by A. Desoete, H. Roeyers, & M. Schittekatte]. Brussels: TEMA.
19.
Johansson, B.S. (2005). Number-word sequence skill and arithmetic performance . Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 157-167.
20.
Jordan, N.C., Levine, S.C., & Huttenlocher, J. (1995). Calculation abilities of young children with different patterns of cognitive functioning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 53-67.
21.
Kingma, J. (1984). Traditional intelligence, Piagetian tasks, and initial arithmetic in kindergarten and primary school grade one. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 145, 49-60.
22.
Le Corre, M., Van de Walle, G., Brannon, E.M., & Carey, S. (2006). Re-visiting the competence/performance debate in the acquisition of the counting principles. Cognitive Psychology , 52, 130-169.
23.
LeFevre, J.A., Smith-Chant, B.L., Fast, L., Skwarchuk, S.L., Sargla, E., Arnup, J.S., et al. (2006). What counts as knowing? The development of conceptual and procedural knowledge of counting from kindergarten through Grade 2. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93, 285-303.
24.
Lourenço, O., & Machado, A. (1996). In defense of Piaget's theory: A reply to 10 common criticisms. Psychological Review, 103, 143-164.
25.
McNamara, B.E. (2007). Learning disabilities: Bridging the gap between research and classroom practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ : Pearson Prentice Hall.
26.
Mercer, C.D., & Pullen, P.C. (2005). Students with learning disabilities (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
27.
Muldoon, K.P., Lewis, C., & Francis, B. (2007). Using cardinality to compare quantities: The role of social-cognitive conflict in early numeracy. Developmental Science, 10, 694-711.
28.
Pasnak, R., Cooke, W.D., & Hendricks, C. (2006). Enhancing academic performance by strengthening class-inclusion reasoning. The Journal of Psychology, 140, 603-613.
29.
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1959). La genèse des structures logiques éléméntaires: Classification et sériation [The development of basic logical structures: Classification and seriation]. Neuchâtel, France: Delachaux and Niestlé.
30.
Piaget, J., & Szeminska, A. (1941). La genèse du nombre chez l'enfant [The development of numbers in children]. Neuchâtel, France: Delachaux and Niestlé.
31.
Rittle-Johnson, R., Siegler, R.S., & Wagner, M. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 346-362.
32.
Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Test of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research-Online, 8(2), 23-74.
33.
Shulruf, B., Hattie, J., & Dixon, R. (2007). Development of a new measuring tool for individualism and collectivism, Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment , 25, 385-401.
34.
Stock, P., Desoete, A., & Roeyers, H. (2007). Early markers for arithmetic difficulties. Educational & Child Psychology, 24, 28-39.
35.
Tymms, P. (1999). Baseline assessment, value-added and the prediction of reading, Journal of Research in Reading, 22, 27-36.
