This study examined potential differential examiner ratings for a large sample of self-identified Hispanics on the Woodcock Johnson Psychoeducational Battery—Third Edition (WJ-III) Test Session Observation Checklist (TSOC). Both between-group (Hispanics vs. non-Hispanics) and within-group analyses (Hispanics disaggregated by first spoken language, language spoken in the home, and mother's highest educational level) were conducted. Four research hypotheses were tested through 44 analyses. Most comparisons were not statistically significant, and across- and within-group differences had minimal influence in analyses that were statistically significant. The authors conclude that there is no compelling evidence of substantial systematic differences in examiner ratings of Hispanics' test-session behaviors on the WJ-III.
Bradley, R.H., & Corwyn, R.F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Reviews in Psychology, 53, 371-399.
2.
Clarizio, H.F. (1982). Intellectual assessment of Hispanic children. Psychology in the Schools, 19(1), 61-71.
3.
Cummins, J. (1979). Cognitive/academic language proficiency, linguistic interdependence, the optimum age question and some other matters. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 19, 121-129.
4.
Cummins, J. (1988). “Teachers are not miracle workers:” Lloyd Dunn's call for Hispanic activism. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 10(3), 263-272.
5.
Cureton, E.E. (1956). Rank biserial correlation. Psychometrika , 21(3), 287-290.
6.
Diaz, J. (1988). Assessment of Puerto Rican children in bilingual education programs in the United States: A critique of Lloyd M. Dunn's monograph . Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 10(3), 237-252.
7.
Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Hoffman, M.B. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The Learning Potential Assessment Device, theory instruments, and techniques . Baltimore: University Park Press .
8.
Figueroa, R.A. (1983). Test bias and Hispanic children. Journal of Special Education, 17(4), 431-440.
9.
Figueroa, R.A., & Hernandez, S. (2000). Testing Hispanic students in the United States: Technical and policy issues. Washington, DC: President's Advisory Commission on Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans . (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 441 652)
10.
Frisby, C. (1999). Culture and test session behavior: Part I. School Psychology Quarterly, 14(3), 263-280.
11.
Frisby, C., & Osterlind, S. (2006). A descriptive analysis of Test Session Observation Checklist ratings from the Woodcock Johnson III standardization sample. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24(4), 342-357.
12.
Glutting, J.J., Oakland, T., & Konold, T.R. (1994). Criterion-related bias with the Guide to the Assessment of Test-Session Behavior for the WISC-III and WIAT: Possible race/ethnicity, gender, and SES effects. Journal of School Psychology, 32(4), 355-369.
13.
Hollander, M., & Wolfe, D.A. (1999). Nonparametric statistical methods (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley Interscience.
14.
Jensen, A.R. (1974). How biased are culture loaded tests?Genetic Psychology Monographs, 90, 185-244.
15.
Lopez, C., Lopez, V., Suarez-Morales, L., & Castro, F.G. (2005). Cultural variation within Hispanic-American families . In C. L. Frisby & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of multicultural school psychology (pp. 234-264). New York: John Wiley.
16.
McConaughy, S.H., & Achenbach, T.M. (2004). Manual for the test observation form for ages 2-18. Burlington: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families .
17.
McGrew, K., & Woodcock, R. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III technical manual. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
18.
McShane, D., & Cook, V.J. (1985). Transcultural intellectual assessment: Performance by Hispanics on the Wechsler scales. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence: Theories, measurements and applications (pp. 737-786). New York: John Wiley.
19.
Mercer, J.R. (1988). Ethnic differences in IQ scores: What do they mean? (A response to Lloyd Dunn). Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 10(3), 199-218.
Nandakumar, R., Glutting, J.J., & Oakland, T. (1993). Mantel-Haenszel methodology for detecting item bias: An introduction and example using the Guide to the Assessment of Test Session Behavior. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment , 11, 108-119.
22.
Oakland, T., & Glutting, J.J. (1990). Examiner observations of children's WISC-R test-related behaviors: Possible socioeconomic status, race, and gender effects. Psychological Assessment, 2(1), 86-90.
23.
Oakland, T., Glutting, J.J., & Watkins, M.W. (2005). Assessment of test behaviors with the WISC-IV . In A. Prifitera, D. H. Saklofske, & L. G. Weiss (Eds.), WISC-IV clinical use and interpretation (pp. 435-463). Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.
24.
Oakland, T., & Parmelee, R. (1985). Mental measurement of minority-group children . In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence: Theories, measurements and applications (pp. 699-736). New York: John Wiley.
25.
Trueba, H.T. (1988). Comments on L. M. Dunn's bilingual Hispanic children on the U.S. mainland: A review of research on their cognitive, linguistic, and scholastic development. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 10(3), 253-262.
26.
Tzuriel, D., & Kaufman, R. (1999). Mediated learning and cognitive modifiability: Dynamic assessment of young Ethiopian immigrants in Israel. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 13, 539-552.
27.
U.S. Census Bureau (2000). United States census 2000: Summary file 3. Retrieved October 8, 2005 , from http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www./2002/sumfile3.html
28.
Willig, A.C. (1988). A case of blaming the victim: The Dunn monograph on bilingual Hispanic children on the U.S. mainland. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 10(3), 219-236.
