The reliability of scores for the Draw-A-Person Intellectual Ability Test for Children, Adolescents, and Adults is examined with a sample of 110 college students from two universities in the southeast. The alpha coefficient for the total sample and the interscorer and intrascorer reliability for a subset of 31 students are analyzed. The alpha coefficient for the 23 items for the total sample was .82. The correlation coefficient for IQ is .83 for interscorer reliability and .92 for intrascorer reliability. Results are consistent with those reported by the test authors.
Abell, S. C., Wood, W., & Liebman, S. J., (2001). Children’s human figure drawings as measures of intelligence: The comparative validity of three scoring systems. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 19(3), 204-215.
2.
Aiken, R. L. (2000). Psychological testing and assessment (10th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allen and Bacon.
3.
Barnes, E. (1893). A study of children’s drawings. Pedagogical Seminary, 2, 416-451.
4.
Bovan, J., & Craig, R. J. (2002). Validity of projective drawing indices of male homosexuality. Psychological Reports, 90(1), 175-183.
5.
Catte, M., & Cox, M. V. (1999). Emotional indicators in children’s human figure drawings. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 8(2), 86-91.
6.
Cox, M. V., & Catte, M. (2000). Severely disturbed children’s human figure drawings: Are they unusual or just poor drawings?European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 9(4), 301-306.
7.
Dumont, F., & Smith, D. (1996). Projectives and their infirm research base. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 27, 419-420.
8.
Garb, H. N., Wood, J. M., & Nezworski, M. T. (2000). Projective techniques and the detection of child sexual abuse. Child Maltreatment: Journal of the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children, 5(2), 161-168.
9.
Goodenough, F. (1926). Measurement of intelligence by drawings. Chicago: World Book.
10.
Guilford, J. P. (1956). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
11.
Harris, D. B. (1963). Children’s drawings as measures of intellectual maturity: A revision and extension of the Goodenough Draw-A-Man Test. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
12.
Hibbard, S. (2003). A critique of Lilienfeld et al.’s (2000) “The scientific status of projective techniques.”Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(3), 260-271.
13.
Joiner, T. E., Jr., & Schmidt, K. L. (1997). Drawing conclusions—or not—from drawings. Journal of Personality Assessment, 69, 476-481.
14.
Klepsch, M., & Logie, L. (1982). Children draw and tell: An introduction to the projective uses of children’s human figure drawings. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
15.
Koppitz, E. M. (1968). Psychological evaluation of children’s human figure drawings. New York: Grune & Stratton.
16.
Koppitz, E. M. (1984). Psychological evaluation of human figure drawings by middle school pupils. New York: Grune & Stratton.
17.
Lally, S. J. (2001). Should human figure drawings be admitted to court?Journal of Personality Assessment, 76(1), 135-139.
18.
Lev-Wiesel, R., & Hershkovitz, D. (2000). Detecting violent aggressive behavior among male prisoners through the Machover Draw-A-Person test. Arts in Psychotherapy, 27(3), 171-177.
19.
Lilienfeld, S. O., Wood, J. M., & Garb, H. N. (2000). The scientific status of projective techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1(2), 27-66.
20.
Machover, K. (1949). Personality projection in the drawing of the human figure. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
21.
Motta, R. W., Little, S. G., & Tobin, M. I. (1993). The use and abuse of human figure drawings. School Psychology Quarterly, 8, 162-169.
22.
Naglieri, J. A. (1988). Draw-a-person: A quantitative scoring system. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
23.
Reynolds, C. R., & Hickman, J. A. (2004). Draw-A-Person Intellectual Ability Test for Children, Adolescents, and Adults examiner’s manual. Austin, TX: Pro-ed.
24.
Ricci, C. (1894). L’arte de bambini. Pedagogical Seminary, 3, 302-307.
25.
Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (2004) Assessment (8th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
26.
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 13.0 for Windows [software application]. (2005). Chicago: Prentice Hall.
27.
Swan-Foster, N., Foster, S., & Dorsey, A. (2003). The use of the human figure drawing with pregnant women. Journal of Reproductive & Infant Psychology, 21(4), 293-307.
28.
Tanaka, C., & Sakuma, H. (2004). Human figure drawing size and body image in preschool children from a self-physique perspective. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 99(2), 691-700.
29.
West, M. M. (1998). Meta-analysis of studies assessing the efficacy of projective techniques in discriminating child sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 22(11), 1151-1166.
