Christ, T.J., Burns, M.K., & Ysseldyke, J. (2005). Conceptual confusion within response-to-intervention vernacular: Clarifying meaningful differences. Communiqué.
2.
Fletcher, J.M., Foorman, B.R., Boudousquie, A., Barnes, M.A., Schatschneider, C., & Francis, D.J. (2002). Assessment of reading and learning disabilities: A research-based intervention-oriented approach. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 27-63.
3.
Fuchs, L.S. (2003). Assessing intervention responsiveness: Conceptual and technical issues. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 172-186.
Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 204-219.
6.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., & Compton, D.L. (2004). Identifying reading disabilities by responsiveness-to-instruction: Specifying measures and criteria. Learning Disability Quarterly , 27, 216-227.
7.
Heller, K.A., Holtzman, W.H., & Messick, S. (1982). Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
8.
Speece, D.L., & Case, L.P. (2001). Classification in context: An alternative approach to identifying early reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 735-749.
9.
Tavers, J.R. (1982). Testing in educational placement: Issues and evidence . In K. A. Heller, W. H. Holtzman, & S. Messick (Eds.), Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity . Washington, DC: National Academies Press.