Oral reading fluency is a good predictor of performance on state reading assessments. The present study addressed the issue of bias by examining whether oral reading fluency scores differentially predict performance on a state reading assessment and the Metropolitan Achievement Tests, 7th Edition (MAT/7) across economic and racial groups. Information from 442 fourth-grade students from a Midwest public school was analyzed using multiple linear regression. All three variables made a significant contribution to predicting performance on the state assessment and the MAT/7. Oral reading fluency made the greatest contribution. The results also indicate that the oral reading fluency scores exhibit intercept bias on the state reading test. A stepwise regression procedure found no evidence of bias. On both the state reading test and the MAT/7, the test scores of African American and low-income students were overpredicted, whereas those of Caucasian and higher-income students were underpredicted.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arnold, V. A., & Smith, C. B. (1987). Macmillan connections reading program. New York: Macmillan.
2.
Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (1984). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change. New York: Pergamon.
3.
Deno, S. L. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement and special education services: A fundamental and direct relationship. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 1-17). New York: Guilford Press.
4.
Deno, S. L., Fuchs, L. S., Marston, D., & Shin, J. (2001). Using curriculum-based measurement to establish growth standards for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Reuiew, 30, 507-524.
5.
Flaugher, R. L. (1978). The many definitions of test bias. American Psychologist, 33, 671-679.
6.
Fry, E. (1977). Fry's readability graph: Clarifications, validity, and extension to level 17. Journal of Reading, 21, 242-252.
7.
Good, R. H., III, & Jefferson, G. (1998). Contemporary perspectives on curriculum-based measurement validity. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 61-88). New York: Guilford Press.
8.
Gulliksen, H., & Wilks, S. (1950). Regression tests for several samples. Psychometrica, 15, 91-114.
9.
Henderson, D. A., & Denison, D. R. (1989). Stepwise regression in social and psychological research. Psychological Reports, 64, 251-257.
10.
Hintze, J. M., Callahan, J. E., III, Matthews, W. J., & Williams, S. A. S. (2002). Oral reading fluency and prediction of reading comprehension in African American and Caucasian elementary school children. School Psychology Review, 31, 540-553.
11.
Howell, D. C. (1992). Statistical methods for psychology (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.
12.
Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York: The Free Press.
13.
Jensen, A. R. (1981). Straight talk about mental tests. New York: The Free Press.
14.
Knoff, H. M., & Dean, K. R. (1994). Curriculum-based measurement of at-risk students' reading skills: A preliminary investigation of bias. Psychological Reports, 75, 1355-1360.
15.
Kranzler, J. H., Miller, D., & Jordan, L. (1999). An examination of racial/ethnic and gender bias on curriculum-based measurement of reading. School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 327-342.
16.
Marston, D. B. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In M.R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18-78). New York: Guilford.
17.
McGlinchey, M. T., & Hixson, M. D. (in press). Using curriculum-based measurement to predict performance on state assessments in reading. Manuscript submitted for publication.
18.
Michigan Department of Treasury (2001). Design and validity of the A1lEAP test. Retrieved April 11, 2002, from http://www.meritaward.state.mi.us/mma/design.htm
19.
Michigan State Board of Education (1999). 1999 Update of the Essential Skills Reading Test Blueprint Michigan Educational Assessment Program. Lansing MI: Michigan State Board of Education.
20.
Reynolds, C. R., Lowe, P. A., & Saenz, A. L. (1999). The problem of bias in psychological assessment. In C. R. Reynolds & T. B. Gutkin (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (3rd ed., pp. 549-595). New York: Wiley.
21.
Shinn, M. R. (Ed). (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford Press.
22.
Shinn, M. R. (Ed). (1998). Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement. New York: Guilford Press.
23.
Shinn, M. R., Good, R. H., Knutson, N., Tilly, W. D., & Collins, V. L. (1992). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: A confirmatory analysis of its relation to reading. School Psychology Review, 21, 459-479.
24.
Stage, S. A., & Jacobsen, M. D. (2001). Predicting student success on a state-mandated performance-based assessment using oral reading fluency. School Psychology Review, 30, 407-419.
25.
The Psychological Corporation (1993). Metropolitan Achievement Tests Seventh Edition. San Antonio, TX: Author.
26.
Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational Battery-Revised. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
