Assessment of Reading Rate in Postsecondary Students

Abstract

There has been a steady increase in students with disabilities attending college and making requests for test accommodations. Most requests are for extended time, presumably due to slow reading speed. Tests of reading rate for adults have been criticized for poor psychometric adequacy, and no current norms exist regarding the expected reading rate for college students. This study examined reading rate via two methods, as well as their relationship to other reading measures. Ninety typical college students (67% female) were administered the Nelson Denny Reading Test (Reading Rate [NDRR] and Comprehension [NDC] tests), the Woodcock Johnson-III Reading Fluency (RF) and Word Attack (WA) tests, and three oral reading probes used to obtain words read correctly per minute (WRCM). On average, college students read 189 words correctly per minute based on oral reading probes and 231 wpm based on NDRR. The WRCM measure was more strongly related to RF and WA than was NDRR and was a better predictor of reading comprehension (NDC). It would appear that WRCM may be a better measure of reading rate than the often used, much criticized, Nelson Denny Reading Rate. Additional research on WRCM with adults is recommended.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Blachman, B. (Ed.) (1997). Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Brown, J. I. , Fishco, V. V. , & Hanna, G. S. (1993). Nelson Denny Reading Test: Forms G and H. Itasca, IL: Riverside.

Carver, R. P. (1982). Optimal rate of reading prose. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 56-58.

Carver, R. P. (1990). Reading rate: A review of research and theory. San Diego: Academic Press.

Cummins, R. P. (1981). Test review: The Nelson-Denny Reading Test (Forms E and F). Journal of Reading 25(1), 54-59.

Dale, E. , & Chall, J. S. (1948). A formula for predicting readability. Educational Research Bulletin, 27, 37-53.

Foulke, E. (1971). The perception of time compressed speech. In D. L. Horton & J. J. Jenkins (Eds.), The perception of language. Columbus, OH: Merrill.

Fuchs, L. S. , Tindal, G. , & Deno, S. L. (1984). Methodological issues in curriculum-based reading assessment. Diagnostique, 9, 191-207.

Gordon, B. , & Flippo, R. F. (1983). An update on college reading improvement programs in the southeastern United States. Journal of Reading, 27, 155-163.

10.

Hausfield, S. (1981). Speeded reading and listening comprehension for easy and difficult materials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 312-319.

11.

Henderson, K. (1995). College freshman with disabilities: A triennial statistical profile. Washington, DC: American Council on Education and HEATH Resource Center.

12.

Just, M. A. , & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading from eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329-354.

13.

Keiser, S. (1998). Test accommodations: An administrator's view. In M. Gordon & S. Keiser (Eds.), Accommodations in higher education under the Americans with Disabilities Act. New York: Guilford Press.

14.

Kintsch, W. , & van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363-394.

15.

Legge, G. E. , Ross, J. A. , Maxwell, K. T. , & Luebker, A. (1989). Psychophysics of reading, VII. Comprehension in normal and low vision. Clinical Vision Science, 4, 51-60.

16.

Marston, D. B. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18-78). New York: Guilford Press.

17.

Meyer, B.J. F. , & Rice, G. E. (1989). Prose processing in adulthood: The text, the reader, and the task. In L. W. Poon , D. C. Rubin , & B. A. Wilson (Eds.), Everyday cognition in adulthood and later life (pp. 157-194). New York: Cambridge University Press.

18.

Meyer, B. J. F. , & Talbot, A. P. (1998). Adult age differences in reading and remembering text and using this information in making decisions in everyday life. In M. C. Smith & T. Pourchot (Eds.), Adult learning and development: Perspectives from educational psychology (pp. 179-199). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

19.

Meyer, B. J. F. , Talbot, A. P. , & Florencio, D. (1999). Reading rate and prose retrieval. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 303-329.

20.

Meyer, B. J. F. , Young, C. J. , & Bartlett, B. J. (1989). Memory improved: Reading and memory enhancement across the life span through strategic text structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

21.

O'Reilly, R. P. (1990). An analysis of reading rates in college students. Reading Research and Instruction, 29(2), 1-11.

22.

Perkins, D. (1984). Assessment of the use of the Nelson Denny Reading Test. Forum for Reading 15(2), 64-69.

23.

Rudner, L. M. (1991). Reviews of the Tests Approved by the Secretary of Education for ability to benefit admissions. Washington, DC: ATB Test Reviews.

24.

Shapiro, E. S. (1996). Academic skills problems (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.

25.

Shinn, M. R. , Good, R. H. , Knutson, N. , & Tilly, W. D. (1992). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: A confirmatory analysis of its relation to reading. School Psychology Review, 21(3), 459-479.

26.

Vogel, S. A. , Leonard, F. , Scales, W. , Hayeslip, P. , Hermansen, J. , & Sonnells, L. (1998). The national learning disabilities postsecondary data bank: An overview. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(3), 234-247.

27.

Woodcock, R. W. , & Johnson, M. B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement-Revised. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.

28.

Woodcock, R. W. , McGrew, K. S. , & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement-III. Itasca, IL: Riverside.