Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Many experts in cognitive test interpretation encourage the use of ipsative strength and weakness determinations. In fact, most modern intelligence tests provide tables for immediate determination of cutoff scores for such ipsative comparisons. The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition (WAIS-11) is the most popular cognitive test to do so. However, the conjointly developed Wechsler Memory Scales-Third Edition (WMS-III) did not have a sister table to allow for ipsative determination of strengths and weaknesses provided by the publisher. Recently, Ryan, Arb, and Ament (2000) provided tables for ipsative cutoff scores for the WMS-III based upon the total sample. This article presents a continuation of their tables, providing cutoff scores for all normed age groups (which can vary markedly from one age group to another, as well as from the total sample group). The current article also provides a means by which to obtain cutoff scores for supplemental subtests compared to the average of the primary subtests.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Campbell, B. , & Wilson, B. J. (1986). An investigation of Kaufman's method for determining scatter of the WISC-R. Journal of School Psychology, 24, 373-380.

Davis, F. B. (1959). Interpretation of differences among averages and individual test scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 162-170.

Groth-Marnett, G. (1998). Handbook of psychological assessment. New York: Wiley.

Kaufman, A. S. (1990). Assessing adolescent and adult intelligence. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Kaufman, A. S. (1994). Intelligent testing with the WISCIII. New York: Wiley.

Kaufman, A. S. , & Lichtenberger, E. O. (1999). Essentials of WAIS-III assessment. New York: Wiley.

Krauskopf, C. J. (1991). Pattern analysis and statistical power. Psychological Assessment, 3, 261-264.

Lichtenberger, E. O. , Kaufman, A. S. , & Lai, Z. C. (2002). Essentials of VMS-III assessment. New York: Wiley.

MacMann, G. M. , & Barnett, D. W. (1997). Myth of the master detective: Reliability of interpretations for Kaufman's “intelligent testing” approach to the WISC-III. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 197-234.

10.

McDermott, P. A. , Fantuzzo, J. W. , & Glutting, J. J. (1990). Just say no to subtest analysis: A critique of Wechsler theory and practice. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 290-302.

11.

McDermott, P. A. , Fantuzzo, J. W. , Glutting, J. J. , Watkins, M. W. , & Baggaley, A. R. (1992). Illusions of meaning in the ipsative assessment of children's ability. Journal of Special Education, 25, 504-526.

12.

Poon, L. W. (Ed.). (1986). Clinical memory assessment of older adults. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

13.

The Psychological Corporation (1997a). WMS-III administration and scoring manual. San Antonio, TX: Author.

14.

The Psychological Corporation (1997b). WAIS-Ill administration and scoring manual. San Antonio, TX: Author.

15.

The Psychological Corporation (1997c). WAIS-III-WMS-III technical manual. San Antonio, TX: Author.

16.

Ryan, J. J. , Arb, J. D. , & Ament, P. A. (2000). Supplementary WMS-III Tables for Determining Primary Strengths and Weaknesses. Psychological Assessment, 12, 193-196.

17.

Sattler, J. M. (1992). Assessment of children: Revised and updated (3rd ed.). San Diego, CA: Author.

18.

Silverstein, A. B. (1982). Pattern analysis of simultaneous statistical inference. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 234-240.

19.

Silverstein, A. B. (1987). Unusual test score combinations and unusual test score differences. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 490-492.

20.

Silverstein, A. B. (1993). Type I, Type II, and other types of errors in pattern analysis. Psychological Assessment, 5, 72-74.

21.

Watkins, M. W. , & Glutting, J. J. (2000). Incremental validity of the WISC-III profile elevation, scatter, and shape information for predicting reading and math achievement. Psychological Assessment, 12, 402-408.

Comprehensive Tables for Determination of Strengths and Weaknesses on the WMS-III

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References