Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the WPPSI,WPPSI-R,and WISC-R: Evaluation of a Model Based on Knowledge-Dependent and Processing-Dependent Subtests

Abstract

Previous factor analyses of the Wechsler scales have supported a two-factor (WPPSI and WPPSI-R) and three-factor solution (WISC-R). The present paper explores the validity of a four-factor model across these three instruments. The four-factor model maintains Wechsler's original distinction between verbal and nonverbal domains but distinguishes between “knowledge dependent” and “processing dependent” factors within each domain. Four separate LISREL maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analyses were performed on the WPPSI, WPPSI-R, and WISC-R standardization samples. A best-fitting model was determined by comparing the present four-factor model to the traditional two-factor model that distinguished between Verbal and Performance and a three-factor model that parallels the WISCR factor structure. The new four-factor model resulted in a significant improvement of fit compared to both the two-factor and three-factor models across the three samples. The clinical validity of the model was examined by analyzing the profile patterns of language-impaired children (N = 198) tested with the WPPSI and reading-impaired children (N= 230) tested with the WISC-R. Because processing-dependent tests require more mapping than knowledge-dependent tests, the pattern “knowledge dependent” > “processing dependent” is predicted. This pattern was confirmed in both samples.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen, S. R. , & Thorndike, R. M. (1995). Stability of the WPPSI and WISC-III factor structure using cross-validation of covariance structure models. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 13, 3-20.

Anderson, T. , & Dixon, W. E. (1995). Confirmatory factor anaylsis of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Revised with normal and psychiatric adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescents, 5 (3), 319-332.

Browne, M. W. , & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Campbell, T. , Dollaghan, C. , Needleman, H. , & Janosky, J. (1997). Reducing bias in language assessment: Processing-dependent measures. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 519-525.

Carlson, L. C. , & Reynolds, C. R. (1981). Factor structure and specific variance of the WPPSI subtests at six age levels. Psychology in the Schools, 18, 48-54.

Dollaghan, C. , & Campbell, T. F. (1998). Nonword repetition and child language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 1136-1146.

Gaulin, C. , & Campbell, T. F. (1994). A procedure for assessing verbal working memory in normal school-age children. Some preliminary data. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 55-64.

Gyurke, J. S. , Stone, B. J. , & Beyer, M. (1990). A confirmatory factor analysis of the WPPSI-R. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 15-21.

Hill, T. D. , Reddon, J. R. , & Jackson, D.N. , (1985). The factor structure of the Wechsler scales: A brief review. Clinical Psychology Review, 5, 287-306.

10.

Hollenbeck, G. R. , & Kaufman, A. S. (1973). Factor analysis of the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 29, 41-45.

11.

Johnston, J. R. (1994). Cognitive abilities of children with language impairment. In R. V. Watkins & M. L. Rice (Eds.), Specific language impairments in children (Communication and language intervention, Vol. 4). London: Paul H. Brookes.

12.

Jøreskog, K. , & Sørbom, D. (2000). LISREL 8.30. Scientific Software International.

13.

Kaufman, A. S. ,(1979). Intelligent testing with the WISC-R. New York: Wiley.

14.

O'Grady, K. E. (1990). A confirmatory factor analysis of the WPPSI. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 135-140.

15.

Ottem, E. (1998). Interpreting the WISC-R subtest scores of reading impaired children: A structural approach. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 34, 1-7.

16.

Ottem, E. (1999). Interpreting the WPPSI subtest scores of language impaired children: A structural approach. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 40, 319-328.

17.

Silverstein, A. B. (1977). Comparison of two criteria for determining the number of factors. Psychological Reports, 41, 387-390.

18.

Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180.

19.

Stone, B. J. , Gridley, B. E. , & Gyurke, J. S. (1991). Confirmatory factor analysis of the WPPSI-R at the extreme end of the age range. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 9, 263-270.

20.

Wechsler, D. (1949). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. New York: The Psycological Corporation.

21.

Wechsler, D. (1967). Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI). New York: The Psychological Corporation.

22.

Wechsler , (1974). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York: The Psychological Corporation.

23.

Wechsler, D. (1990). Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Revised (WPPSI-R, UK). London: The Psychological Corporation.

24.

Wechsler, D. (1991). VWIS-III manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.