The federal definition of giftedness conceptualizes giftedness as extraordinary intellectual and academic ability and high performance capability in creativity, the arts, and leadership. The practice of identifying gifted students in the schools typically centers on assessing intellectual and academic abilities. Rarely do schools identify the other areas of giftedness. This article reviews the technical adequacy and usefulness of three popular teacher rating scales designed to identify gifted students: the Gifted and Talented Evaluation Scales (GATES; Gilliam, Carpenter, & Christensen, 1996); Gifted Evaluation Scale, Second Edition (GES-2; McCarney & Anderson, 1989); and Scales for Rating the Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students (SRBCSS; Renzulli, Smith, White, Callahan, & Hartman, 1976; Renzulli, Smith, White, Callahan, Hartman, & Westberg, 1997).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alvino, J., McDonnel, T. C., & Richert, S. (1981). National survey of identification practices in gifted and talented education. Exceptional Children, 48, 124-132.
2.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological measurement. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
3.
Ashman, S. S., & Vukelich, C. (1983). The effect of different types of nomination forms on teachers' identification of gifted children. Psychology in the Schools, 20, 518-527.
4.
Boatman, T. A., Davis, K. G., & Benbow, C. P. (1995). Best practices in gifted education. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology-III (pp. 1083-1095). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
5.
Bracken, B. (Ed.). (2000). The psychoeducational assessment of preschool children. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
6.
Bracken, B., Keith, L. K., & Walker, K. C. (1994). Assessment of preschool behavior and social-emotional functioning: A review of thirteen third-party instruments. Assessment in Rehabilitation and Exceptionality, 1, 331-346.
7.
BurkeJ. P., Haworth, C. E., & Ware, W. B. (1982). Scale for Rating Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students: An investigation of factor structure. Journal of Special Education, 16, 477-485.
8.
Callahan, C. M. (1997). Giftedness. In G. G. Bear & K. M. Minke & A. Thomas (Eds.), Children's needs II: Development, problems and alternatives (pp. 431-448). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
9.
Coleman, M. R., & Gallagher, J. J. (1995). State identification policies: Gifted students from special populations. Roeper Review, 17, 268-275.
10.
Coleman, M. R., Gallagher, J. J., & Foster, A. (1994). Update report on state policies related to the identification of gifted students. Chapel Hill, NC: Gifted Education Policy Studies Program at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
11.
Elliot, S. N., Argulewicz, E. N., & Turco, T. L. (1986). Predictive validity of the scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students for gifted children from three sociocultural groups. Journal of Experimental Education, 55, 27-32.
12.
Elliot, S. N., Busse, R. T., & Gresham, F. M. (1993). Behavior rating scales: Issues of use and development. School Psychology Review, 22, 313-321.
13.
Evans, K. (1996). Policy for the identification of students for gifted programs. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 8, 74-86.
14.
Feldhusen, J. F. (1998). Identification and assessment of talented learners. In J. VanTassel-Baska (Ed.), Excellence in educating gifted and talented learners. Denver, CO: Love.
15.
Feldhusen, J. F., & Heller, K. A. (1986). Introduction. In K. A. Heller & J. F. Feldhusen (Eds.), Identifying and nurturing the gifted: An international perspective (pp. 19-31). Toronto: Hans Huber Publishers.
16.
Ghiselli, E. E., Campbell, J. P., & Zedeck, S. (1981). Measurement theory for the behavioral sciences. San Francisco: Freeman.
17.
Gilliam, J. E., Carpenter, B. O., & Christensen, J. R. (1996). Gifted and Talented Evaluation Scales. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
18.
Gridley, B., E., & Treloar, J. H. (1984). The validity of the Scales for Rating the Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students for the identification of gifted students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2, 65-71.
19.
Hagen, E. (1980). Identification of the gifted. New York: Teacher's College Press.
20.
Hany, E. A. (1993). Methodological problems and issues concerning identification. In K. A. Heller & F. J. Mönks & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 209-232). New York: Pergamon.
21.
Haroutounian, J. (1995). Talent identification and development in the arts: An artistic/educational dialogue. Roeper Review, 13, 112-117.
22.
Hunsaker, S. L., & Callahan, C. M. (1995). Creativity and giftedness: Published instrument uses and abuses. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 110-114.
23.
Kaufman, A. S., & Harrison, P. L. (1986). Intelligence tests and gifted assessment: What are the positives?Roeper Review, 8, 154-159.
24.
Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research (3rd ed.). Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
25.
Klausmeier, K., Mishra, S. P., & Maker, C. J. (1987). Identification of gifted learners: A national survey of assessment practices and training needs of school psychologists. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 135-137.
26.
McCarney, S. B., & Anderson, P. D. (1989). Gifted Evaluation Scale, Second Edition, Technical manual. Columbia, MO: Hawthorne Educational Services.
27.
McCoach, D. B., Kehle, T. J., Bray, M. A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Best practices in the identification of gifted students with learning disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 403-411.
28.
Moon, S. M., Kelly, K. R., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1997). Specialized counseling services for gifted youth and their families: A needs assessment. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41, 16-25
29.
Oakland, T., Falkenberg, B. A., & Oakland, C. (1996). Assessment of leadership in children, youth, and adults. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 138-146.
30.
Pfeiffer, S. I. (2001). Professional psychology and the gifted: Emerging practice opportunities. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 32, 175-180.
31.
Pfeiffer, S. I. (in press). Challenges and opportunities for students who are gifted: What the experts say. Gifted Child Quarterly.
32.
Pfeiffer, S. I., & Jarosewich, T. (in preparation). Gifted Rating Scales-Preschool/Kindergarten and School Forms. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
33.
Pfeiffer, S. I., Soldivera, S., & Norton, J. (1992). Consumer's guide to mental health outcome measures. Villanova, PA: The Devereux Foundation. (Reprinted in ERIC Reports, TM019317).
34.
Piirto, J. (1999). Talented children and adults: Their development and education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
35.
Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L. H., White, A. J., Callahan, C. M., & Hartman, R. K. (1976). Scales for Rating the Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
36.
Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L. H., White, A. J., Callahan, C. M., Hartman, R. K., & Westberg, K. L. (1997). Scales for Rating the Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
37.
Richert, E. S. (1987). Rampant problems and promising practices in the identification of disadvantaged gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 149-154.
38.
Robinson, N. M., Zigler, E., & Gallagher, J. J. (2000). Two tails of the normal curve. American Psychologist, 55, 1413-1424.
39.
Rust, J. O., & Lose, B. D. (1980). Screening for giftedness with the Slossen and the Scale for Rating Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students. Psychology in the Schools, 17, 446-451.
40.
Sattler, J. M. (2002). Assessment of children: Behavioral and clinical applications. San Diego: Author.
41.
Stephens, K. R., & Karnes, F. A. (2000). State definitions for the gifted and talented revisited. Exceptional Children, 66, 219-238.
42.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement (1993). National excellence: A case for developing America's talent. Washington, DC: Author.
43.
Verhulst, F. C., & Koot, H. (1992). Child psychiatric epidemiology: Concepts, methods, and findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
44.
Walker, K. C., & Bracken, B. (1996). Inter-parent agreement on four preschool behavior rating scales: Effects of parent and child gender. Psychology in the Schools, 33, 273-283.
