An Empirical Approach to the Performance Assessment of Solid Waste Landfills

Abstract

Several methods and models have been developed to simulate or assess the probability, magnitude and potential consequences of the leakage of aqueous environmental contaminants from solid waste landfills and similar facilities. The various models incorporate many common factors, including climatological and geological char acteristics. Each model, however, employs a unique approach to the problem, assigns different relative weights to factors, and relies upon extrapolation of small-scale experimental data and/or the designers' subjective judgment in predicting the various mechanisms of full-scale landfill failure that lead to contaminant migration. As a result, no two models are likely to yield the same assessment of a given facility, and no one model has been validated as a predictor of long-term landfill performance. More than 500 landfills, virtually all unlined and now closed, were analyzed to determine the correlation between a multitude of observable parameters and the actual performance of these landfills over periods up to 90 years. Landfill surface area, seismic impact, freeze/thaw cycling, potential evaporation relative to pre cipitation, and several other factors were found to be significantly correlated with performance. The results of this empirical analysis suggest that the many existing models may be refined to acknowledge relevant landfill performance parameters, and their relative weights and critical values. © 1997 ISWA

Keywords

Environmental risk model leachate solid waste contaminant migration landfill monitoring.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Algermissen, S.T. (1969) Seismic Risk Studies of the United States. In Proceedings of the Fourth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering , Santiago, Chile: 14-27.

Aller, L. et al. (1987) DRASTIC: A Standardized System for Evaluating Ground Water Pollution Potential Using Hydrogeologic Settings. EPA-600/2-87-035 . Ada OK, U.S.A.: EPA and National Water Well Association.

Box, G.E.P. , Hunter, W.G. & Hunter, J.S. (1978) Statistics for Experimenters. New York NY, U.S.A.: John Wiley & Sons.

CH2M Hill, Inc. (1981) Installation Restoration Program Phase 1: Records Search, MacDill AFB , Florida. Contract No. F08637 80 G0010 0003. Report for USAF Engineering and Services Center, Tyndall AFB FL, U.S.A.

DOD [Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Environmental Security) ] (1994) Relative Risk Site Evaluation Primer. Interim Edition. Washington DC, U.S.A.

DPRA, Inc. (1991) Subtitle D Risk Model Background Document. Appendix A: Failure/Release Submodel. Draft submitted to U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste. St. Paul MN, U.S.A.

Earth Technology Corporation and ERM Program Management Company (1992) User's Manual for the Defense Priority Model. FY 93 Version; Interim Draft prepared for the Office of Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Environment). Alexandria VA, U.S.A.

Eidenshink, J.C. (1992) The North American Vegetation Map. Washington DC, U.S.A.: U.S. Geological Survey.

Elsbury, B.R. et al. (1990) Lessons Learned from Compacted Clay Liner . Journal of Geotechnical Engineering (ASCE) 11, 1641-1660.

10.

Epa (1983) Surface Impoundment Assessment National Report. EPA/570/9-84/002. Washington DC, U.S.A.: GPO.

11.

Epa (1984) Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Site Ranking Systems, A User's Manual. HW-10. Washington DC, U.S.A.: GPO.

12.

Epa (1985) Post-Closure Liability Trust Fund Simulation Model. Volume I: Model Overview and Results. PB 86-212479. Washington DC, U.S.A.: GPO.

13.

Epa (1986) SOILINER Model. EPA/530/SW-86/006. Washington DC, U.S.A.: GPO.

14.

Epa (1990) Field Test of the Proposed Revised Hazard Ranking System (HRS). EPA/540/P-90/ 001 . Washington DC, U.S.A.: GPO.

15.

Epa (1993a) Environmental Fact Sheet: The National Corrective Action Prioritization System. EPA/530-F-92-027 . Washington DC, U.S.A.: GPO.

16.

Epa (1993b) Fact Book: National Priorities List Under the Original Hazard Ranking System 1981-1991. EPA/540/R-93/079 . Washington DC, U.S.A.: GPO.

17.

Epa (1993c) Project Summary: Subtitle D Landfill Application Manual for the Multimedia Exposure Assessment Model (MULTIMED). Washington DC, U.S.A.: GPO.

18.

Epa (1994) Seminar Publication: Design, Operation & Closure of Municipal Solid Waste Landfills. EPA/625/R-94/008 . Washington DC, U.S.A.: GPO.

19.

Fenn, D.G. , Hanley, K.J. & De Geare, T.V. (1975) Use of the Water Balance Method for Predicting Leachate Generation from Solid Waste Disposal Sites. EPA Report No. 168. Cincinnati OH, U.S.A.: EPA.

20.

Fetter, C.W. (1988) Applied Hydrogeology. 2nd Edn. New York NY, U.S.A.: Macmillan .

21.

Freeze, R.A. & Cherry, J.A. (1979) Groundwater. Englewood Cliffs NJ, U.S.A.: Prentice Hall.

22.

Fungaroli, A.A. (1971) Pollution of Subsurface Water by Sanitary Landfills , Volume 1. SW-12rg. Washington DC, U.S.A.: EPA.

23.

Hydrosphere, Inc. (1990) CLIMATEDATA. Summary of the Day. CD-ROM. Washington DC, U.S.A.: NOAA.

24.

LaGrega, M.D. , Buckingham, P.L. & Evans, J.C. (1994) Hazardous Waste Management. New York NY, U.S.A.: McGraw-Hill.

25.

LeGrand, H.E. (1983) A Standardized System for Evaluating Waste-Disposal Sites. 2nd Edn. Worthington OH , U.S.A.: National Water Well Association.

26.

Nixon, W.B. (1995) A Risk Mitigation Methodology for Solid Waste Landfills . Ph.D. Dissertation. Tampa FL, U.S.A.: University of South Florida.

27.

Nixon, W.B. & Murphy, R.J. (1995) Environmental Hazard Assessment Models: An Overview . In Proceedings of the Air & Waste Management Association 88th Annual Meeting and Exhibition, San Antonio TX, U.S.A. Paper No. 95-RP1440A.01.

28.

Perrier, E.R. & Gibson, A.C. (1980) Hydrologic Simulation on Solid Waste Disposal Sites (HSSWDS). EPA/SW-868. Washington DC, U.S.A.: GPO.

29.

Pope-Reid Associates (1985) Liner Location Risk and Cost Analysis Model. Draft Report and Appendices prepared for U.S. EPA. PB87-157210/157756. Washington DC, U.S.A.: EPA.

30.

PRC Environmental Management, Inc. (1992) RCRA National Corrective Action Prioritization System Guidelines, Revised. Draft for EPA, under Contract No. 68-W9-0006, Work Assignment No. R05021.

31.

Rohlf, F.J. & Sokal, R.R. (1981) Statistical Tables. 2nd Edn. New York NY, U.S.A.: W. H. Freeman & Company.

32.

Schroeder, P.R. (1990) HELP Model for Design and Evaluation of Liquids Management Systems. In Seminars-Design and Construction of RCRA/CERCLA Final Covers. CERI 90-50. Washington DC, U.S.A.: GPO.

33.

Solar Energy Research Institute (1980) Insolation Data Manual. SERI/SP-755-789. Golden CO, U.S.A.

34.

Suter II, G.W. , Luxmoore, R.J. & Smith, E.D. (1993) Compacted Soil Barriers at Abandoned Landfill Sites are Likely to Fail in the Long Term. Journal of Environmental Quality 2, 217-26.

35.

Tchobanoglous, G. , Theisen, H. & Vigil, S. (1993) Integrated Solid Waste Management. New York NY, U.S.A.: McGraw-Hill.

36.

USAF [Air Weather Service] (1992) International Station Meteorological Climate Summary. Version 2.0. CD-ROM . Washington DC, U.S.A.

37.

Weeks, O.L. , Mansell, R.S. & McCallister, S.W. (1992) Evaluation of Soil Top-Cover Systems to Minimize Infiltration into a Sanitary Landfill: A Case Study. Environmental Geology and Water Science 2, 139-151.