This paper compares a traditional engineering approach (direct waste analysis) for collecting waste quantity and waste composition data to a social science approach (questionnaire surveys) for dealing with the same problem. The advantages and disadvantages of these two methodologies are discussed, and a comparison made of the results obtained from applying these methodologies to a case study of the industrial-commercial-institutional waste stream in Metropolitan Toronto. The study shows that while the two approaches produce fairly similar waste quantity estimates, their waste composition estimates are not as close and vary considerably by material.
Bird & Hale Ltd. (1978) Municipal Refuse Statistics for Canadian Communities of Over 100,000 (1976-1977) .
2.
Belson, W.A. (1986) Validity in Survey Research. Aldershot, U.K.: Gower Publishing Company Ltd.
3.
Britton, P.W. (1972) Improving Manual Solid Waste Separation Studies . Journal of the Sanitary Engineering Division, ASCE98, No. SA5.
4.
Brunner, P.H. & Ernst, W.R. (1986) Alternative Methods for the Analysis of Municipal Solid Wastes. Waste Management & Research4, 147-160.
5.
Cal Recovery Systems Inc./Recovery Sciences Inc. (1989) Waste Characterization Study for Berkeley, California. Prepared for the Department of Public Works, City of Berkeley, California, U.S.A.
6.
Cook, R.D. (1977) Detection of Influential Observation in Linear Regression. Technometrics19, 15-18.
7.
DeGeare, T.V. Jr. & Ongerth, J.E. (1971) Empirical Analysis of Commercial Solid Waste Generation. Journal of the Sanitary Engineering Division, ASCE97 (SA6), 843-850.
8.
Franklin Associates Ltd. (1990) Estimates of the Volume of MSW and Selected Components in Trash Cans and Landfills . Kansas, U.S.A.: Franklin Associates Ltd.
9.
Golueke, C.G. (1971) Comprehensive Studies of Solid Waste Management . Third Annual Report, National Technical Information Service, NTIS Report PB 218-265. Washington, D.C., U.S.A.: U.S. Department of Commerce.
10.
Gore & Storrie Ltd. (1991a) Ontario Waste Composition Study, Volume II: Commercial Waste Composition Study . Toronto, Canada: Ontario Ministry of the Environment.
11.
Gore & Storrie Ltd. (1991b) Ontario Waste Composition Study, Volume III: Procedures Manual. Toronto, Canada: Ontario Ministry of the Environment .
12.
Hinshaw, J. & Braun, I. (1991) Targeting Commercial Businesses for Recycling. Resource Recycling. November, 27-32.
13.
Kauffman, C.R. (1990) Quantity and Composition of Household Solid Wastes Collected in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Master of Applied Science thesis, University of Toronto, Canada.
14.
Klee, A.J. (1980) Design & Management for Resources Recovery, Vol. 3. Quantitative Decision Making. Ann Arbor, MI, U.S.A.: Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Inc./The Butterworth Group.
15.
Klee, A.J. & Carruth, D. (1970) Sample Weights in Solid Waste Composition Studies . Journal of the Sanitary Engineering Division, ASCE96 (SA4), Proc. Paper 7469, 945-954.
16.
Lohani, B.N. & Ko, S.M. (1988) Optimal Sampling of Domestic Solid Waste. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 114(6), 1479-1483.
17.
Matrix Management Group, R. W. Beck and Associates & Gilmore Research Group (1988) Best Management Practices Analysis for Solid Waste, Volume One, 1987 Recycling and Waste Stream Survey . Office of Waste Reduction and Recycling, Washington State Department of Ecology, U.S.A.
18.
Matrix Management Group, Herrera Environmental Consultants, R. W. Beck and Associates, Fernandes Associates, and Gilmore Research Group (1989) 1988/1989 Waste Stream Composition Study, Final Report. City of Seattle, Department of Engineering, Solid Waste Utility, U.S.A.
19.
Matrix Management Group, Herrera Environmental Consultants, R. W. Beck and Associates, Fernandes Associates, C2S2 Group, Inc. and Elway Research, Inc. (1991) 1990 Waste Stream Composition Study, Final Report. City of Seattle, Department of Engineering, Solid Waste Utility, U.S.A.
20.
Michigan Department of Natural Resources ( 1986) Solid Waste Stream Assessment Guidebook. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Community Assistance Division, Lansing, Michigan, U.S.A.
21.
Musa, E. & Ho, G.E. (1981) Optimum Sample Size in Refuse Analysis. Journal of the Sanitary Engineering Division, ASCE107, No. EEH, 1247-1259.
22.
Mylnarski, H.D. & Northrop, G.M. (1975) Derivation of Residual Coefficients for Typical Polluting Industries in New England. National Technical Information Service, NTIS Report PB 258-996. Washington, D.C., U.S.A.: U.S. Department of Commerce .
Niessen, W.R. & Alsobrook, A.F. (1972) Municipal and Industrial Refuse: Composition and Rates. Proceedings: 1970 National Incinerator Conference. New York, U.S.A.: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 319-337.
25.
Ontario Legislative Assembly (1992) Bill 143: An Act Respecting the Management of Waste in the Greater Toronto Area and to Amend the Environmental Protection Act. Toronto , Canada: Queen's Printer for Ontario.
26.
Rhyner, C.R. & Green, B. (1988) The Predictive Accuracy of Published Solid Waste Generation Factors. Waste Management & Research6, 329-338.
27.
SCS Engineers (1979) Municipal Solid Waste Survey Protocol. MunicipalEnvironmental Research LaboratoryOffice of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, U.S.A.
28.
SCS Engineers (1975) Quantities and Composition of Solid Wastes Generated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Offices, Washington Mall, Washington D. C., 4014 Long Beach Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90807, U.S.A.
29.
SCS Engineers (1989) Metro Waste Characterization Study 1989/90, Sort No. 1 Spring Season. Prepared for the Portland Metropolitan Service District, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A.
Steiker, G. (1973) Solid Waste Generation Coefficients: Manufacturing Sectors. Regional Science Research Institute, Discussion Paper Series No. 70, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A.
32.
SWEAP (Solid Waste Environmental Assessment Plan) (1991) Waste Composition Study. Metropolitan Toronto Department of Works, Discussion Paper No. 4.3, Toronto, Canada.
33.
Warriner, G.K., McDougall, G.H.G. & Claxton, J.D. (1984) Any Data or None at all? Living With Inaccuracies in Self-reports of Residential Energy Consumption. Environment and Behaviour16, 503-526.
34.
Wilson, D.W., Rathje, W.L. & Huges, W.W. (1989) Volume of Solid Wastes Under Differing Landfill Compositions: Compaction Experiments on Fresh and Landfill Refuse from Tucson, Arizona. The Garbage Project. U.S.A.: Franklin Associates Ltd.
35.
Wisconsin Bureau of Solid Waste Management ( 1988) Guide to Conducting Waste Characterization Studies. Madison, WI, U.S.A.: Bureau of Solid Waste Management.
36.
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources ( 1974) Report on the State of Wisconsin Solid Waste Management Plan. Madison, WI, U.S.A.: Department of Natural Resources.
