A multicriteria decision-aid method, Electre II, was applied to the real choice process of a solid waste management system in the Uusimaa region, Finland. The criteria used were chosen by a supervision group. The weights of the criteria were defined by the managers of environmental and technical affairs of each municipality in Uusimaa, Finland. The use of the Electre II method leads us to recommend centralized incineration as the best municipal solid waste management system for the planning region. However, the second best alternative, intermediate RDF combustion with intermediate landfilling was finally chosen by the municipalities.
Barda, O.H., Dupuis, J. & Lencioni, P. (1990) Multicriteria location of thermal power plants. EuropeanJournal of Operational Research45, 332-346.
2.
Berman, E.B. (1976) WRAP-A model for regional solid waste management planning. Documentation of operational and exercise runs. MITRE Technical Report MTR—3219. Bedford Massachusetts, U.S.A.
3.
Bouyssou, D. (1990). Building criteria: A prerequisite for MCDA. In Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid ( Bana e Costa, C.A. ed), Springer-Verlag, Germany. 58-80.
4.
Brans, J.P., Vincke, Ph. & Mareschal, B. (1986) How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. EuropeanJournal of Operational Research2, 228-239.
5.
Briggs. Th., Kunsch, P.L. & Mareschal, B. (1990) Nuclear waste management: An application of the multicriteria PROMETHEE methods. EuropeanJournal of Operational Research44, 1-10.
6.
Caruso, C., Colorni, A. & Paruccini, M. (1993) The regional urban solid waste management system: A modelling approach. EuropeanJournal of Operational Research70, 16-30.
7.
Chapman, R.E. & Berman, E.B. (1983) The resource recovery planning model: A new tool for solid waste management. NBS Special Publications 657, Washington, U.S.A.
8.
Commission of the European Communities (1991 ) Proposal for a Council Directive on the Landfill of Waste . COM (91) 102 final, SYN 335, Brussels, Belgium.
9.
D'Avignon, G. & Vincke, Ph. (1988) An outranking method under certainty. EuropeanJournal of Operational Research36, 311-321.
10.
Drobny, R.B., Qasim, S.R. & Valentine, B.W. (1971) Cost-effectiveness analysis of waste management systems. Journal of Environmental Systems2, 189-210.
11.
Energy Systems Research Group Inc. (1989) Waste Plan. The Solid Waste Management Planning Tool. User's guide version 98.7. Boston: Energy Systems Research Group Inc., U.S.A.
12.
Fuertes, L.A., Hudson, J.F. & Marks, D.H. (1974) Solid waste management: equity trade-off models. Journal of The UrbanPlanning and Development Division2, 155-171.
13.
Goicoechea, A., Hansen, D.R. & Duckstein, L. (1982) Multiobjective Decision Analysis with Engineering and Business Applications. John Wiley & Sons, New York, U.S.A.
14.
Grassin, N. (1986) Constructing "population" criteria for the comparison of different options of high voltage route. European Journal of Operational Research26, 42-57.
15.
Halinen, A. & Juvonen, H. (1990) Yhdyskuntajätteiden lajittelu suomalaisissa kotitalouksissa (Source separation of household wastes in Finland). Ympäristöministeriö , Selvitys79.
16.
Hasit, Y., Warner, D.B. (1981) Regional solid waste planning with WRAP. Journal of the Environmental Engineering Division3, 511-525.
17.
Kaila, J. (1987) Mathematical model for strategy evaluation of municipal solid waste management systems. VTT publishers 40, Espoo, Finland. 71s.
18.
Keeney, R.L. (1992) Value-focused Thinking. A Path to Creative Decisionmaking . Harvard University Press, London , U.K.
19.
Keeney, R.L. & Raiffa, H. (1976) Decisions with Multiple Objectives. Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. John Wiley & Sons, New York, U.S.A.
20.
Massam, B.H. (1988) Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) techniques in planning. In Diamond, D. & McLoughlin, J. B. (eds): Progress in Planning , Vol. 30, 1-84, Pergamon Press , Oxford, U.K.
21.
Maystre, L.Y. & Simos, J. (1987). In L'aide à la Décision dans l'organisation (ed. Afcet), 253-258, Association française pour la cybernétique économique et technique, Paris, France.
22.
McDonald P. I. (1976) Environmental impact of waste disposal sites: methods of assessment. Solid Wastes2, 509-514.
23.
Merkhofer, M.W., Keeney, R.L. (1987) A multiattribute utility analysis of alternative sites for the disposal of nuclear waste. Risk Analysis7, 173-194.
24.
Ministry of Environment. (1992a) Finnish Environmental Legislation. Ministry of Environment, General Management Division, Helsinki, Finland.
25.
Ministry of Environment. (1992b) Waste Act, Draft version II. Ministry of Environment, Helsinki, Finland.
26.
Nijkamp, P. & Voss, J.B. (1977) A multicriteria analysis for water resource and land use development. Water Resources Research3, 513-518.
27.
Ostanello, A. (1983) Outranking methods. In: Fandel, G. & Spronk, J. (eds): Multiple Criteria Decision Methods and Applications (Selected readings of the First International summer school, Acireale , Sicily), Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, Japan. p. 41-60.
28.
Popovich, M.L., Duckstein, L. & Kisiel, C.C. (1973) Cost-effectiveness analysis of disposal systems. Journal of TheEnvironmental Engineering Division5, 577-591.
29.
Roy, B. ( 1973) How outranking relation helps multiple criteria decision making. In Multiple Criteria Decision Making, (Cochrane, J. L. & Zeleny, M. eds), University of South-Carolina Press, South Carolina, U.S.A. p. 179-201.
30.
Roy, B. ( 1978) Partial preference analysis and decision-aid: The fuzzy outranking relation concept. In Conflicting Objectives in Decisions , (Bell, D. E., Keeney, R. L. & Raiffa, H.), John Wiley & Sons, U.S.A. p. 40-75.
31.
Roy, B. ( 1991) The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. Theory and Decision31, 49-73.
32.
Roy, B. & Bouyssou, D. (1986) Comparison of two decision-aid models applied to a nuclear power plant siting example. EuropeanJournal of Operational Research25, 200-215.
33.
Roy, B. & Bouyssou, D. (1993) Aide multicritère à la décision: Méthodes et Cas , Economica, Paris.
34.
Roy, B. & Hugonnard, J.C. (1982) Ranking of suburban line extension projects on the Paris metro system by a multicriteria method. Transportation Research16A, 301-312.
35.
Roy, B., Présent, M. & Silhol, D. (1986) A programming method for determining which Paris metro stations should be renovated. European Journal of Operational Research2, 318-334.
36.
Roy, B., Slowinski, R. & Treichel, W. (1992) Multicriteria programming of water supply systems for rural areas. Water Resources Bulletin28, 13-31.
37.
Roy, B. & Vincke, Ph. (1981) Multicriteria analysis: survey and new directions. EuropeanJournal of Operational Research8, 207-218.
38.
Roy, B. & Vincke, Ph. (1984) Relational systems of preference with one or more pseudo-criteria: some new concepts and results. Management Science11, 1323-1335.
39.
Rushbrook, P.E. & Pugh, M.P. (1987) An illustrated description of harbinger. Wastes Management6, 348-361.
40.
Salo, M. & Saarikoski, K. (1982) Alueellisen jätehuollon kehittäminen Suomessa. Matemaattinen malli jätehuoltojärjestelmän suunnittelussa, (A mathematical tool for regional planning for solid waste management system in Finland). VTT Tutkimusraportti90, Espoo, Finland.
41.
Simos, J. (1990) Evaluer L'Impact sur L'Environnement. Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, Lausanne, Switzerland.
42.
Siskos, J. & Hubert, P. (1983) Multi-criteria analysis of the impacts of energy alternatives: a survey and new comparative approach. EuropeanJournal of Operational Research13, 278-299.
43.
Siskos, J., Lombard, J. & Oudiz, A. (1986) The use of multicriteria outranking methods in the comparison of control options against a chemical pollutant: the case of vinyl chloride monomer. Journal of the Operational Research Society37, 357-371.
44.
Sobral, M.M. & Hipel, K.W. & Farquhar, G.J. (1981) A multi-criteria model for solid waste management. Journal of Environmental Management12, 97-110.
45.
Vincke, Ph. (1992) Multicriteria Decision-aid. New York, U.S.A.
46.
Wenger, R.B. & Rhyner, C.R. (1972) Evaluation of alternatives for solid waste systems . Journal of Environmental Systems2, 89-108.
