Managing environmental issues and setting priorities requires an environmental costing procedure. The present study developed a "Model for Environmental Costs" (MEC) using five cost categories. The testing of the model in a furniture manufacturing plant showed that 35.2% of the total environmental costs were in effect mitigating correction costs, while 20.5% were prevention costs. Total environmental costs were 2.13% of the added value. The total amount of waste material amounted to 28% of the total material input. The MEC can be used as an internal management tool for priority setting and resource allocation, or for comparative analysis of industrial categories.
Ahaus, C.T.B., de Heer, A. & Vos, A.M.A.M. (1988) Quality Costs, What For? (N1)Deventer, Holland: Kluwer Publishing.
2.
CBS, Central Bureau of Statistics. (1990) Annual Statistics, Voorburg, The Netherlands.
3.
Diependaal, M.J. (1990) The regulator's haste with a corporate environmental care system. Environmental Market, 1 40-41.
4.
Hofstra, N.A., Timár, J. A. H. R. & DeWalle, F.B. (1990) Corporate Management of Environmental Issues, Deventer, The Netherlands: Samson Tjeenk Willink Publ .
5.
Huisingh, D. et. al. (1990) Proven profits from pollution prevention: case studies in resource conversation and waste reduction. The Institute for Local Self-Reliance, Washington DC , U.S.A.
6.
NNI, Netherlands Normalisation Institute. ( 1989a). Quality control and the elements of a quality system, (NEN-ISO 9004), Delft, The Netherlands.
7.
NNI, Netherlands Normalisation Institute. ( 1989b). Quality, terms and definitions (NEN-ISO 8402), Delft, The Netherlands.
8.
VROM, Ministry of Housing, Physical Planning and Environment. (1989). Corporate Environmental Care System . Governmental Printing Office, The Hague, The Netherlands.
