A number of policy barriers must be addressed by the governments in Europe and North America which have adopted objectives of diverting from disposal something like 50% of the solid waste stream by means of reduction, re-use and recycling. These include: the need for clarification of responsibilities of all levels of government and of private sector product manufacturers and waste disposers; putting in place incentives for source separation; ensuring markets for recyclables; and allocating the increased cost of waste management. This paper reports on findings of a research project undertaken in 1991-92 on steps being taken by different jurisdictions to overcome such barriers.
Beck, P. & Grogan, P. (1991). Minimum content legislation: an effective market development tool. Resource Recycling, September, 1991.
2.
Californians Against Waste. (1991). Cutting our Waste in Half. California Department of Conservation , U.S.A.
3.
Canada. (1992). Economic Instruments for Environmental Protection: Discussion Paper. Ottawa, Canada: Minister of Supply and Services.
4.
Danish Ministry of the Environment. (1990). Mid-Way Report on the Green Municipality Projekt. Danish Ministry of the Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
5.
deKadt, M. (1991). Recycling Programs in Islip, New York, and Somerset County, New Jersey. INFORM, Inc.New York, NY, U.S.A.
6.
Environmentally Sensitive Products Committee. ( 1991). Environmentally Sensitive Procurement: Federal and Provincial Initiatives in Recycled Paper, Re-refined Oil, Packaging, and Standards. Federal/Provincial/Territorial Source Development and Access Task Force, Canada.
7.
Fenton, R.W. (1993). Pulling in the same direction: private waste stewardship and municipal waste management planning. Alternatives19, (2).
Leith, B. (1992). The delusions of environmental production. Policy Options13, (5).
10.
Macdonald, D.Taxation and user-fees as potential policy instruments in the emerging regulatory regime of solid waste diversion. Toronto, Canada: York University, forthcoming.
11.
Macdonald, D. & Vopni, P. (1992). Overcoming Barriers to Large-Scale Diversion of Municipal Solid Waste. International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives, Toronto, Canada.
12.
McRobert, D. (1993). Restructuring the economy: A look at the implications of the shift to recycled materials. Alternatives19, (2).
13.
Page, T. (1978). Conservation and Economic Efficiency: An Approach to Materials Policy. Baltimore, U.S.A.: Johns Hopkins University Press.
14.
Schrader, J. (1991). Creating Markets: The Next Step for State Recycling Programs. Centre for Policy Alternatives, Washington, D.C., U.S.A.
15.
Schwartzel, E. (1992). Economic Instruments to Encourage Waste Reduction Reuse and Recycling. Waste Caucus of the Ontario Environment Network, Toronto, Canada.
16.
Schwartzel, E. & Haliniak, J. (1991). Putting Our Money Where Our Mouth Is: A Review of Environmental Purchasing Policies by Metro Area Municipalities. Pollution Probe Foundation, Toronto, Canada.
17.
Waldrop, T. (1992). Package Deal. Tomorrow, May, 1992.
18.
Winfield, M., et al. (1992). Looking Back and Looking Ahead: Municipal Solid Waste in Ontario from the 1983 Blueprint to 50% Diversion in 2000. Toronto: Canadian Institute for Environmental Law and Policy, 1992.
19.
Weissman, S. (1990). Local Government Procurement and Market Development . Local Government Commission, Sacramento, California, U.S.A.
