A Systems Approach To Municipal Solid Waste Management: a Pilot Study of Goteborg

Abstract

The proposed systems approach to solid waste management consists of two parts, first, a comprehensive model, MIMES/WASTE (a Model for description and optimization of Integrated Material flows and Energy Systems), for analysing the technical properties of the waste management system, and second, procedures to make the model into an efficient tool in the planning process. The paper focuses on the first part by describing the model and the methodology for using it for broad scope technical analysis of the waste management system. A pilot study for the Göteborg region in Sweden, illustrating the methodology and the use of the model, is presented. The MIMES/WASTE model is a systems engineering tool for strategic planning of municipal waste management systems. The model provides a framework for consistent evaluation of: (i) a large number of feasible options for developing the system, (ii) the effects of uncertainties in the system environment and, (iii) various goals set up for the system (e.g. cost efficiency, environmental control, recycling, and energy production). Three modes of application are discussed: long-term planning; short-term planning; and consequence analysis.

Keywords

Waste management municipal solid waste systems analysis municipal engineering mathematical models cost effectiveness integrated resource planning emissions control.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bergqvist, K. & Carlsson, P. (1988) A Systems Study of Municipal and Industrial Waste Management in the Community of Borås (in Swedish). Report T88-142. Göteborg, Sweden: Department of Energy Conversion, Chalmers University of Technology.

Brooke, A. , Kendrick, D. & Meeraus, A. (1988) GAMS-A User's Guide. Redwood City, CA, U.S.A.: The Scientific Press.

Chapman, R. & Berman, E. (1983) The Resource Recovery Planning Model: A New Tool for Solid Waste Management. Special Publication 657, Washington, DC, U.S.A.: U.S. Department of Commerce/National Bureau of Standards.

Checkland, P. (1981) Systems Thinking, Systems Practice. Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons.

Gipperth, P. (1990) Input data for the pilot study of the regional/municipal solid waste management of Göteborg (in Swedish). Göteborg , Sweden: Department of Energy Conversion, Chalmers University of Technology.

Gipperth, P. & Sundberg, J. (1990) A pilot study of the regional/municipal solid waste management of Göteborg (in Swedish). Report 190—25, Göteborg, Sweden: Department of Energy Conversion, Chalmers University of Technology.

Gottinger, H.W. (1988) A computational model for solid waste management with application. European Journal of Operational Research 35, 350-364.

Liebman, J. (1974) Models in solid waste management. In: A Guide to Models in Governmental Planning and Operations Chap. 5. Washington, DC, U.S.A.: Office of Research and Development , Environmental Protection Agency.

Rushbrook, P. (1987) An illustrated description of "HARBINGER", the Harwell waste management model. Wastes Management 77(6), 348-361.

10.

Rvf (1990) Solid Waste Management in Sweden. Report 90:5. Malmö, Sweden: The Swedish Association for Solid Waste Management.

11.

Sundberg, J. (1989) MIMES—A Model for Integrating the Material Flow with the Energy System. Licential thesis. Göteborg , Sweden: Department of Energy Conversion, Chalmers University of Technology.

12.

Sundberg, J. & Wene, C.-O. (1988) MIMES-A model for integrating the material flow with the energy system. In M. Korhonen (ed): Proceedings of VTT symposium on Non-Waste Technology , Espoo, Finland, 20-23 June, 1988. Finland (VTT), Espoo: Technical Research Centre of Finland, p. 199-212.

13.

Wene, C.-O. (1989) Exploring and Mapping: A Comparison of the IEA-MARKAL and CEC-EFOM technical energy systems models and the ANL Electric Utility Model, BNL-52224. Upton, N.Y., U.S.A.: Brookhaven National Laboratory.

14.

Wene, C.-O. & Rydén, B. (1988) A comprehensive energy model in the municipal energy planning process. European Journal of Operational Research 33(2), 212-222.