Microbial and chemical characteristics of refuse in an active state of methane production, incubated in the laboratory with and without leachate recycle, were compared. There were no significant differences in the total anaerobic population or the sub-populations of cellulolytic, hemicellulolytic, acetogenic or methanogenic (based on acetate or H2/CO2 utilization) bacteria in refuse incubated with or without leachate recycle. Therefore, leachate recycle may be used to accelerate refuse decomposition in laboratory-scale test lysimeters without changing the microbial composition of the aforementioned trophic groups. Differences in soluble constituent concentrations and methane production patterns between leachate recycle and non-leachate recycle containers were attributed to the mixing associated with leachate recycle. Under certain circumstances, leachate recycle is a useful technique for acceleration of refuse decomposition in the laboratory, thus reducing the period of time required to study the effect of an addition to the refuse ecosystem on methane production.
Barlaz, M.A. (1988) Microbiological and chemical dynamics during refuse decomposition in a simulated sanitary landfill. Ph.D. Thesis, Dept of Civil Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, U.S.A.
2.
Barlaz, M.A., Milke, M.W. & Ham, R.K. (1987) Gas production parameters in sanitary landfill simulators. Waste Management & Research5, 27-39.
3.
Barlaz, M.A., Ham, R.K. & Schaefer, D.M. (1989a) Mass balance analysis of decomposed refuse in laboratory scale lysimeters. Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE115(6), 1088-1102.
4.
Barlaz, M.A., Schaefer, D.M. & Ham, R.K. (1989b) Bacterial population development and chemicall characterization of refuse decomposition in a simulated sanitary landfill . Applied and Environmental Microbiology55(1), 55-65.
5.
Barlaz, M.A., Schaefer, D.M. & Ham, R.K. (1989c) Inhibition of methane formation from municipal refuse in laboratory scale lysimeters. Applied Biochemistry andBiotechnology20/ 21, 181-205.
6.
Barlaz, M.A., Schaefer, D.M. & Ham, R.K. (1989d) Effects of prechilling and sequential washing on enumeration of microorganisms from refuse. Applied and Environmental Microbiology55(1) 50-54.
7.
Barlaz, M.A., Ham, R.K. & Schaefer, D.M. (1990) Methane production from municipal refuse: A review of enhancement techniques and microbial dynamics . CRC Critical Reviews in Environmental Control19(6), 557-584.
8.
Bollag, J.-M. & Czlonkowski, S.T. (1973). Inhibition of methane formation in soil by various nitrogen-containing compounds. Soil Biology and Biochemistry5, 673-678.
9.
Bray, R.H. & Kurtz, L.T. (1945) Determination of total, organic and available forms of phosphorus in soil. Soil Science59, 39-45.
10.
Buivid, M.G., Wise, D.L., Blanchet, M.J., Remedios, E.C., Jenkins, B.M., Boyd, W.F. & Pacey, J.G. (1981) Fuel gas enhancement by controlled landfilling of municipal solid waste. Resource Recovery and Conservation6, 3-20.
11.
Halvadakis, C.P., Robertson, A.P. & Leckie, J.O. (1983) Landfill methanogenesis: literature review and critique. Technical Report No. 271, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, U.S.A.
12.
Ham, R.K., Hekimian, K.K., Katten, S.L., Lockman, W.J., Lofy, R.J., McFaddin, D.E. & Daley, E.J. (1979) Recovery, processing and utilization of gas from sanitary landfills. EPA-600/2-79/001. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio, U.S.A.
13.
Hartz, K.E., Klink, R.E. & Ham, R.K. (1982) Temperature effects: methane generation from landfill samples. Journal of the Environmental Engineering Division, ASCE108(EE4), 629-638.
14.
Hoeft, R.G., Walsh, L.M. & Keeney, D.R. (1973) Evaluation of various extractants for available soil sulfur. Soil Science of America Proceedings37, 401-404.
15.
Keeney, D.R. & Nelson, D.W. (1982) Nitrogen—inorganic forms. In Methods of Soils Analysis Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties (A. L. Page, ed.) 2nd edition. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, U.S.A., pp. 643-658.
16.
Kinman, R.N., Nutini, D.L., Walsh, J.J., Stamm, J. & Rickabaugh, J. (1987) Gas enhancement techniques in landfill simulators. Waste Management & Research5, 13-25.
17.
Mackie, R.I. & Bryant, M.P. (1981) Metabolic activity of fatty acid oxidizing bacteria and the contribution of acetate, propionate butyrate and CO2 to methanogenesis in cattle waste at 40°C and 60°C. Applied Environmental Microbiology41(6), 1363-1373.
18.
Pettersen, R.C., Schuandt, V.H. & Effland, M.J. (1984) An analysis of the wood sugar assay using HPLC: a comparison with paper chromatography. Journal of ChromatographicScience22,478-484.
19.
Pohland, F.G. (1975) Sanitary landfill stabilization with leachate recycle and residual treatment. Georgia Institute of Technology , Atlanta, GA, U.S.A., EPA Grant No. R-801397 (PB 248524/1BA).
20.
Pohland, F.G. & Gould, J.P. (1986) Co-disposal of municipal refuse and industrial waste sludge in landfills. WaterScience and Technology18(12), 177-192.
21.
Robinson, J.A. & Tiedje, J.M. (1984) Competition between sulfate-reducing and methanogenic bacteria for H2 under resting and growing conditions. Archives of Microbiology137, 26-32.
22.
Varel, V.H., Fryda, S.F., Robinson, I.M. (1984) Cellulolytic bacteria from pig large intestine . Applied Environmental Microbiology47(1), 219-221.
23.
Warshaw, J.E., Leschine, S.B. & Canale-Parola, E. (1985) Anaerobic cellulolytic bacteria from wetwood of living trees. Applied Environmental Microbiology50(4), 807-811.
24.
Widdel, F. (1988) Microbiology and ecology of sulfate- and sulfur-reducing bacteria. In Biology of Anaerobic Microorganisms (A. J. B. Zehnder, ed.). New York, U.S.A.: John Wiley & Sons.
25.
Zehnder, A.J.B. (1978) Ecology of methane formation. In Water Pollution Microbiology, v. 2 (R. Mitchell, ed.). New York, U.S.A.: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 349-376.
