The present study evaluates the implementation of the EC Directive concerning transfrontier movements of hazardous wastes. Two of the identified bottlenecks, i.e. "the surplus of forms" and "too long delay in returning forms," were studied in greater detail. A comparison of the forms used in the international waste transport in Europe showed a redundancy of information in comparison with the EC form. This indicates substantial cost savings when the existing forms are replaced by a "single administrative document", for which the EC form can serve as an example.
Bartels, J. (1988) "Evaluation of the EC directive 84/631/EEC considering the situation in the Netherlands", Delft, January 1988 (Dutch).
2.
Cec (1978) Council of the European Communities, "Council Directive on Toxic and Dangerous Waste", 78/319/ EEC.
3.
Cec (1984) Council of the European Communities, "Council Directive on the Supervision and Control of Transfrontier Shipment of Hazardous Wastes within the European Community", 84/631/ EEC.
4.
Erl (1985) Environmental Resources Ltd, "Regulations and Actions in the Member States Implementing Directive 78/319/EEC on Disposal of Toxic and Dangerous Waste", London, UK, August 1985.
5.
MacNeil, J.W. (1985) Policy issues concerning transfrontier movements of hazardous waste. In Transfrontier Movements of Hazardous Waste, OECD, Paris, 1985.
6.
Nanninga, M. (1987) "Drawbacks in the implementation of EC-Direetive 84/631/EEC", Delft, April 1987 (Dutch).
7.
Veen F. van, (1985) National hazardous waste monitoring systems. In Transfrontier Movements of Hazardous Waste, OECD, Paris, 1985.
