The capital costs of existing and proposed resource recovery facilities in the U.S.A. are analysed as a function of facility size and type. Empirical relationships are developed to relate capital costs of modular incinerators, heat-recovery incinerators, rotary combustors, and refuse-derived fuel facilities to design capacities. The scale factors are compared to published values. Economies of scale are not present except for small refuse-derived fuel and steam generating facilities handling less than 1000 tonne day-1.
Alvarez, R.J. (1985), A look at U.S. plants that are burning MSW, WasteAge, January, 58-61.
2.
Bridgwater, A.V. (1977), Technological economics applied to waste recovery and treatment processes, Effluent Water Treatment Journal , 17, 223-227.
3.
Engineering News Record (1985), McGraw-Hill Publishers, New York, NY, U.S.A.
4.
Grant, K.D. & Cooper, D.W. (1982), Landfill disposal costs are based on daily tonnage . In 1982 Sanitation Industry Yearbook, pp. 24-26. Solid Wastes Management, Atlanta, GA 30328, U.S.A.
5.
Holland, F.A., Watson, F.A. & Wilkerson, J.K. (1974), How to estimate capital costs, Chemical Engineering, Albany, 81, 71-76.
6.
Midwest Research Institute (1973), Resource recovery: the state of technology. Report for the President's Council on Environmental Quality, Report PB 214 149. National Technical Information Service. U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C., 20230, U.S.A.
7.
Miller, C.A. (1973), Current concepts in capital cost, forecasting , Chemical Engineering Progress, 69, 77-83.
8.
Schulz, H.W., Benziger, J.B., Bortz, B.J., Neamatalla, M., Szostak, R.M., Tong, G. & Westerhoff, R.P. (1976), Resource Recovery Technology for Urban Decisionmakers, Report PB 252 458. Prepared for the National Science Foundation by Urban Technology Center, Columbia University, NY. National Technical Information Service.
