AngelidakiIKarakashevDBatstoneDJ, et al. (2011) Biomethanation and its potential. Methods in Enzymology494: 327–351.
2.
ArsalanMD․ RhithuparnaDAkhtarS, et al. (2025) Evaluating the multifaceted separative role of cellulose acetate supported zinc oxide nanocomposite reverse osmosis membrane towards water decontamination and desalination. Energy Nexus20: 100555.
3.
BilgiliMSDemirAVarankG (2012) Effect of leachate recirculation and aeration on volatile fatty acid concentrations in aerobic and anaerobic landfill leachate. Waste Management & Research30: 161–170.
4.
BonillaOLeHT (2023).Multi-functional energy storage system for supporting solar PV plants and host power distribution system. Journal of Energy Storage73: 108933.
5.
BrunnerPHUnterbergerAFellnerJ (2023) Improving waste management by focussing on goals: A mini review of the publication sector. Waste Management & Research41: 1717–1727.
6.
CaironeSOlivaGRomanoF, et al. (2025) Enhancing process monitoring and control in novel carbon capture and utilization biotechnology through artificial intelligence modeling: An advanced approach toward sustainable and carbon-neutral wastewater treatment. Chemosphere376: 144299.
7.
Cañada-BarcalaAPinzolas-RubioALarribaM, et al. (2026) Sorption enhanced CO2 methanation via two-step reaction-regeneration process at atmospheric pressure using Ni-based catalysts and zeolite 3A. Fuel405: 136509.
8.
CatalanoGD’AdamoIGastaldiM, et al (2024) Incentive policies in biomethane production toward circular economy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review202: 114710.
9.
ChaherNEHNassourANellesM (2024) The (FWE)2 nexus: Bridging food, food waste, water, energy, and ecosystems for circular systems and sustainable development. Trends in Food Science & Technology154: 104788.
10.
ContiMEAstolfiMLMeleG, et al. (2022) Performance of bees and beehive products as indicators of elemental tracers of atmospheric pollution in sites of the Rome province (Italy). Ecological Indicators140: 109061.
11.
CunninghamMMTranLMcKeeCG, et al. (2022) Honey bees as biomonitors of environmental contaminants, pathogens, and climate change. Ecological Indicators134: 108457.
12.
De PaolaSOlivaGCaironeS, et al. (2025) Reimagining landfills as energy hubs: A new integrated approach for biomethane and green hydrogen production. Energy Nexus20: 100561.
13.
Del BorghiAMoreschiLGalloM (2020) Circular economy approach to reduce water–energy–food nexus. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health13: 23–28.
14.
EssienubongIAOkechukwuEPEjuvwediaSG (2018) Effects of waste dumpsites on geotechnical properties of the underlying soils in wet season. Environmental Engineering Research24: 289–297.
15.
European Commission and Joint Research Centre (2024) Methane Emissions in the Biogas and Biomethane Supply Chains in the EU: An Analysis to Update the Greenhouse Gas Emissions Accounting Methodology of Renewable Energy Directive Annex VI. Publications Office, LU.
16.
Fuente-BallesterosACiuluMHaqueSM, et al. (2025) Honeybees as active bioindicators of plastic pollution: Environmental exposure, analytical strategies, and monitoring perspectives. Science of the Total Environment1003: 180722.
17.
GautamKPandeyNYadavD, et al. (2024) Ecotoxicological impacts of landfill sites: Towards risk assessment, mitigation policies and the role of artificial intelligence. Science of the Total Environment927: 171804.
18.
GhoshPGuptaAThakurIS (2015) Combined chemical and toxicological evaluation of leachate from municipal solid waste landfill sites of Delhi, India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research22: 9148–9158.
19.
González-RosellAPatakiBFehérJ, et al. (2025) A water-energy-food-ecosystems nexus coherence assessment of solutions in the Danube River Basin. Science of the Total Environment1003: 180697.
20.
GuZFengKLiY, et al. (2022) Microbial characteristics of the leachate contaminated soil of an informal landfill site. Chemosphere287: 132155.
21.
GuptaJGhoshPKumariM, et al. (2022) Solid waste landfill sites for the mitigation of greenhouse gases. In: ThakurISPandeyANgoHH, et al. Biomass, Biofuels, Biochemicals. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp.315–340.
22.
HardHRBrusseauMRamirez-AndreottaM (2019) Assessing the feasibility of using a closed landfill for agricultural graze land. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment191: 458.
23.
HooPYHashimHHoWS (2018) Opportunities and challenges: Landfill gas to biomethane injection into natural gas distribution grid through pipeline. Journal of Cleaner Production175: 409–419.
24.
HusseinOIbrahimJ (2023) Leachates recirculation impact on the stabilization of the solid wastes – A review. Journal of Ecological Engineering24: 172–183.
25.
ItalianoCPinoLMaccarroneD, et al. (2025) Enhanced low-temperature activity of CO2 methanation: Effect of metal oxide support on the performance of Ni-based catalysts. Applied Catalysis A: General707: 120529.
26.
JangaJKReddyKR (2024) Integrated resiliency and sustainability assessment of bioreactor landfills. Indian Geotechnical Journal54: 1117–1135.
27.
KatakamVSSBahadurV (2024) Reverse osmosis-based water treatment for green hydrogen production. Desalination581: 117588.
28.
KimYC (2025) Exploring water production dynamics in a Sabatier reactor: A comprehensive experimental investigation. Fuel396: 135298.
29.
KoochYNouraeiAWangL, et al. (2024) Long-term landfill leachate pollution suppresses soil health indicators in natural ecosystems of a semi-arid environment. Chemosphere367: 143647.
30.
LahrichiAEl IssmaeliYKalanurSS, et al. (2024) Advancements, strategies, and prospects of solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs): Towards enhanced performance and large-scale sustainable hydrogen production. Journal of Energy Chemistry94: 688–715.
31.
LiJLiuK (2024) Sustainable space transformation design strategies for post-landfill closure. Sustainability16: 3463.
32.
LiuZWuWShiP, et al. (2015) Characterization of dissolved organic matter in landfill leachate during the combined treatment process of air stripping, Fenton, SBR and coagulation. Waste Management41: 111–118.
33.
Lo FrancoFMorandiARaboniP, et al. (2021) Efficiency comparison of DC and AC coupling solutions for large-scale PV+BESS power plants. Energies14: 4823.
34.
LopesMMCobasVRMBarrosRM, et al. (2019) Energy potential using landfill biogas and solar photovoltaic system: A case study in Brazil. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management21: 1587–1601.
35.
MairKSIrrgeherJHaluzaD (2023) Elucidating the role of honey bees as biomonitors in environmental health research. Insects14: 874.
36.
MamloukM (2022) Alkaline anion exchange membrane (AEM) water electrolysers – Current/future perspectives in electrolysers for hydrogen. In: LetcherTM (ed.) Comprehensive Renewable Energy. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp.473–504.
37.
MinGChoiSHongJ (2022) A review of solid oxide steam-electrolysis cell systems: Thermodynamics and thermal integration. Applied Energy328: 120145.
38.
MoodyCMTownsendTG (2017) A comparison of landfill leachates based on waste composition. Waste Management63: 267–274.
39.
NaazIThenganeSKAroraP, et al. (2025) Waste-to-energy pathways for fresh and legacy waste management: A case study in India. Energy Nexus19: 100472.
40.
NaddeoVZarraTOlivaG, et al. (2016) Environmental odour impact assessment of landfill expansion scenarios: Case study of Borgo Montello (Italy). Chemical Engineering Transactions54: 73–78.
41.
NazirSDoniF (2024) Nexus of circular economy R0 to R9 principles in integrated reporting: Insights from a multiple case study comparison. Business Strategy and the Environment33: 4058–4085.
42.
NegroVNoussanMChiaramontiD (2025) Alternative options for biogas-to-energy: A comparison of electricity and biomethane generation based on the real operation of a production site. Applied Energy377: 124687.
43.
NoussanMNegroVPrussiM, et al. (2024) The potential role of biomethane for the decarbonization of transport: An analysis of 2030 scenarios in Italy. Applied Energy355: 122322.
44.
OlivaGPahunangRRVigliottaG, et al. (2023) Advanced treatment of toluene emissions with a cutting-edge algal bacterial photo-bioreactor: Performance assessment in a circular economy perspective. Science of the Total Environment878: 163005.
45.
PanseriSBonerbaENobileM, et al. (2020) Pesticides and environmental contaminants in organic honeys according to their different productive areas toward food safety protection. Foods9: 1863.
46.
PaoliLCorsiniABigagliV, et al. (2012) Long-term biological monitoring of environmental quality around a solid waste landfill assessed with lichens. Environmental Pollution161: 70–75.
47.
ReddyKRRoblesJRCarneiroSAV, et al. (2022) Tiered Quantitative Assessment of Life Cycle Sustainability and Resilience (TQUALICSR): Framework for design of engineering projects. In: ReddyKRPancharathiRKReddyNGArukalaSR (eds) Advances in Sustainable Materials and Resilient Infrastructure. Singapore: Springer, pp.1–19.
48.
RuschioniSRioloPMinuzRL, et al. (2013) Biomonitoring with honeybees of heavy metals and pesticides in nature reserves of the Marche Region (Italy). Biological Trace Element Research154: 226–233.
49.
SanphotiNTowprayoonSChaiprasertP, et al. (2006) The effects of leachate recirculation with supplemental water addition on methane production and waste decomposition in a simulated tropical landfill. Journal of Environmental Management81: 27–35.
50.
SantosKNajjarMKHaddadA, et al. (2025) Technical feasibility of PVC banners to be reused as geomembrane waterproofing layer in green roofs. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. Epub ahead of print May 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s10098-025-03190-0.
51.
SaunierJ-BLosfeldGFreydierR, et al. (2013) Trace elements biomonitoring in a historical mining district (les Malines, France). Chemosphere93: 2016–2023.
52.
ScheutzCDuanZMøllerJ, et al. (2023) Environmental assessment of landfill gas mitigation using biocover and gas collection with energy utilisation at aging landfills. Waste Management165: 40–50.
53.
SebbahiSAssilaAAlaoui BelghitiA, et al. (2024) A comprehensive review of recent advances in alkaline water electrolysis for hydrogen production. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy82: 583–599.
54.
Segovia-HernándezJGContreras-ZarazúaGRamírez-MárquezC (2023) Sustainable design of water–energy–food nexus: a literature review. RSC Sustainability1: 1332–1353.
55.
SkorbiłowiczMSkorbiłowiczE (2019) Content of calcium, magnesium, sodium and potassium in the street dust from the Area of Białystok (Poland). Journal of Ecological Engineering20: 125–131.
56.
SrivastavaANChakmaS (2022) Bioreactor landfills: sustainable solution for disposal of municipal solid waste. In: HussainCHaitS (eds) Advanced Organic Waste Management. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp.315–328.
57.
SzabóSBódisKKougiasI, et al. (2017) A methodology for maximizing the benefits of solar landfills on closed sites. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews76: 1291–1300.
58.
ThapaAJoHHanU, et al. (2023) Ex-situ biomethanation for CO2 valorization: State of the art, recent advances, challenges, and future prospective. Biotechnology Advances68: 108218.
59.
TripodiAConteFRossettiI (2020) Carbon dioxide methanation: design of a fully integrated plant. Energy Fuels34: 7242–7256.
60.
TsapekosPTreuLCampanaroS, et al. (2021) Pilot-scale biomethanation in a trickle bed reactor: Process performance and microbiome functional reconstruction. Energy Conversion and Management244: 114491.
61.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2024) LFG Energy Project Development Handbook. In: Chapter 3: Landfill Gas Energy Utilization Technologies. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
62.
VaverkováM. D.PaleologosE. K.Sai GoliV. S. N., et al. (2025) Environmental impacts of landfills: Perspectives on bio-monitoring. Environmental Geotechnics12: 76–85.
63.
ZhangXLiYOuyangD, et al. (2021) Systematical review of interactions between microplastics and microorganisms in the soil environment. Journal of Hazardous Materials418: 126288.
64.
ZorpasAA (2024) Promoting circular economy: The transformative impact of deposit refund systems. Waste Management & Research42: 1093–1095.
65.
ZorpasAANaddeoVVoukkaliI, et al. (2025) Environmental ethics considerations in circular economy and waste management. Waste Management & Research43: 133–136.