The rapid industrialization in China has led to significant environmental (especially the greenhouse effect) and human impacts resulting from the industrial hazardous waste (IHW) treatment. Given that incineration is the primary method of IHW disposal, it is imperative to conduct a thorough investigation into the characteristics of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and their mitigation based on the life-cycle assessment methodology. This study analysed the carbon emissions generated by the primary disposal systems within a typical IHW treatment park in Qingdao over a 3-year period. Of the park’s six systems, the carbon emissions from medical waste incineration in 2020 were found to be the highest, totalling 1,377 kg CO2-eq tonne−1. Furthermore, direct GHG emissions accounted for approximately 62% of the total emissions, while electricity and water consumption significantly contributed to indirect emissions. The study indicated a promising potential for GHG emissions reduction, with an estimated 35% decrease by 2022. Moreover, it was projected to yield 49,505 tonnes CO2-eq in carbon avoidance benefits through combined heat and power technology. A comparative analysis conducted in Shanghai highlighted its significance for advancing energy efficiency within the hazardous waste treatment sector. Consequently, this research is vital for formulating strategies to mitigate pollution and carbon emissions from IHW treatment parks.
AlrobaianAA (2020) Improving waste incineration CHP plant efficiency by waste heat recovery for feedwater preheating process: energy, exergy, and economic (3E) analysis. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering42: 403.
2.
BianRXChenJHZhangTX, et al. (2022) Influence of the classification of municipal solid wastes on the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions: A case study of Qingdao City, China. Journal of Cleaner Production376: 134275.
3.
China City Greenhouse Gas Working Group (2022) China Products Carbon Footprint Factors Database. Available at: https://lca.cityghg.com (accessed January 2022).
4.
ChristensenTHDamgaardALevisJ, et al. (2020) Application of LCA modelling in integrated waste management. Waste Management118: 313–322.
5.
FikriEPurwantoPSunokoHR (2015) Modelling of household hazardous waste (HHW) management in Semarang City (Indonesia) by using life cycle assessment (LCA) approach to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Procedia Environmental Sciences23: 123–129.
6.
GallagherKSZhangFOrvisR, et al. (2019) Assessing the Policy gaps for achieving China’s climate targets in the Paris Agreement. Nature Communications10: 1256.
7.
GaoCQBianRXLiP, et al. (2025). Analysis of carbon reduction potential from typical municipal solid waste incineration plants under MSW classification. Journal of Environmental Management373: 123844.
8.
GuoYGladTZhongZ, et al. (2018) Environmental life-cycle assessment of municipal solid waste incineration stocks in Chinese industrial parks. Resources, Conservation and Recycling139: 387–395.
9.
HanXQChangHZWangC, et al. (2023a) Tracking the life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of municipal solid waste incineration power plant: A case study in Shanghai. Journal of Cleaner Production398: 136635.
10.
HanXQLiYXNieL, et al. (2023b) Comparative life cycle greenhouse gas emissions assessment of battery energy storage technologies for grid applications. Journal of Cleaner Production392: 136251.
11.
HeJXLinBQ (2019) Assessment of waste incineration power with considerations of subsidies and emissions in China. Energy Policy126: 190–199.
12.
HongJHanXChenY, et al. (2016) Life cycle environmental assessment of industrial hazardous waste incineration and landfilling in China. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment22: 1054–1064.
13.
HossainMUWangLChenL, et al. (2020) Evaluating the environmental impacts of stabilization and solidification technologies for managing hazardous wastes through life cycle assessment: A case study of Hong Kong. Environment International145: 106139.
14.
HuangBBGanMJiZY, et al. (2022) Recent progress on the thermal treatment and resource utilization technologies of municipal waste incineration fly ash: A review. Process Safety and Environmental Protection159: 547–565.
15.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2006) IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.
16.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2021) Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/ (accessed 7 May 2022).
17.
KourkoumpasDSKarellasSKouloumoundrasS, et al. (2015) Comparison of waste-to-energy processes by means of life cycle analysis principles regarding the global warming potential impact: Applied case studies in Greece, France and Germany. Waste and Biomass Valorization6: 605–621.
18.
LiPLiXLiF (2020) A novel recycling and reuse method of iron scraps from machining process. Journal of Cleaner Production266: 121732.
19.
LiWHuangQLuS, et al. (2015) Life cycle assessment of the environmental impacts of typical industrial hazardous waste incineration in Eastern China. Aerosol and Air Quality Research15: 242–251.
20.
LiXHeCXiaZ, et al. (2023) Analysis of synergies in the reduction of pollution and carbon emissions in industrial parks – An example of hazardous waste co-disposal model in Shanghai Chemical Industry Park. Environmental Protection Science49: 18–26 (in Chinese).
21.
LinXQHuangQXChenT, et al. (2014) PCDD/F and PCBz emissions during start-up and normal operation of a hazardous waste incinerator in China. Aerosol and Air Quality Research14: 1142–1151.
22.
LiuJLiuGZhangWZ, et al. (2023) A new approach to CO2 capture and sequestration: A novel carbon capture artificial aggregates made from biochar and municipal waste incineration bottom ash. Construction and Building Materials398: 132472.
23.
Masson-DelmotteVZhaiPPiraniA (2021) Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change 2. Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/ (accessed 9 August 2021).
24.
Ministry of Ecology and Environment of People’s Republic of China (2022) Annual Emission Reduction Project of China Regional Power Grid Baseline Emission Factors (in Chinese). People’s Republic of China: Ministry of Ecology and Environment.
25.
National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBSC) (2011) China Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press (in Chinese).
26.
National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBSC) (2021) China Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press (in Chinese).
27.
National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBSC) (2023) China Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press (in Chinese).
28.
National Development and Reform Commission of China (NDRC) (2013) GHG accounting methods and reporting guidelines for chemical production enterprises. Beijing: General Office of the National Development and Reform Commission (in Chinese).
29.
OlivierJGPetersJAHW (2020) Trends in global CO2 and total greenhouse gas emissions: 2020 Report. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
30.
QiangZNanQChiW, et al. (2024) Recycling packaging waste from residual waste reduces greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of Environmental Management371: 123028.
31.
SabaghFAHossainpourSPourhemmatiS (2023) Energy, exergy, and economic evaluation of integrated waste incineration facility with a thermal power plant. Energy Conversion and Management: X20: 100434.
32.
SadalaSDuttaSRaghavaR, et al. (2019) Resource recovery as alternative fuel and raw material from hazardous waste. Waste Management & Research37: 1063–1076.
33.
SapuricZDimitrovskiDDimitrovskiM, et al. (2016) Medical waste incineration in Skopje.Regulation and standards. Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology17: 805–812.
34.
SunYQQianYFChuSQ (2023) The impact of waste classification on carbon emissions in the incineration process in Suzhou. Environmental Sanitation Engineering31: 104–111+118 (in Chinese).
35.
TsaiWTKuoKC (2010) An analysis of power generation from municipal solid waste (MSW) incineration plants in Taiwan. Energy35: 4824–4830.
36.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2022) Fourth biennial update report of China. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Available at: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/ (accessed 26 May 2022).
37.
WangNGuoZQMengFX, et al. (2019) The circular economy and carbon footprint: A systematic accounting for typical coal-fuelled power industrial parks. Journal of Cleaner Production229: 1262–1273.
38.
WangNRenYXZhuT, et al. (2018) Life cycle carbon emission modelling of coal-fired power: Chinese case. Energy162: 841–852.
39.
XiaoWLiuTTongX (2023) Assessing the carbon reduction potential of municipal solid waste management transition: Effects of incineration, technology and sorting in Chinese cities. Resources, Conservation and Recycling188: 106713.
40.
YangJZhangZYYangMW (2019) Optimal operation strategy of green supply chain based on waste heat recovery quality. Energy183: 599–605.
41.
ZhaoHLLiuFLiuHQ, et al. (2020) Comparative life cycle assessment of two ceramsite production technologies for reusing municipal solid waste incinerator fly ash in China. Waste Management113: 447–455.
42.
ZhaoHLLiuHQWeiGX, et al. (2021) Comparative life cycle assessment of emergency disposal scenarios for medical waste during the COVID-19 pandemic in China. Waste Management126: 388–399.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
