Introducing flexible biogas production (FB) can result in instantaneous high-shock loads for anaerobic digestion system, posing risks to the system’s stable operation. Steel slag, a typical metallurgical solid waste, has been demonstrated to enhance the buffering capacity of digestion systems, thereby increasing methane production and achieving ‘waste treatment using waste’. However, its efficacy under high-shock loads in FB is uncertain. Pulse feeding experiments simulating FB were conducted to analyse the system’s impact resistance with steel slag addition and investigate its enhancement mechanisms. The addition of steel slag improved the methane production rate under various shock conditions, with a particularly notable enhancement under concentration shock. This scenario also saw a significant increase in the generation of soluble chemical oxygen demand and its utilization by microorganisms. This can be attributed to the enrichment of hydrolytic bacterial phyla (Firmicutes) and genera (Gelria), with functional gene analysis revealing an increase in genes associated with Fe(III) reduction and CO2-to-methane pathways. The study results indicate that the role of steel slag as an alkaline, iron-rich material enhances system alkalinity, reduces inhibition from H2 partial pressure and boosts hydrogenotrophic methanogen activity, making it suitable as an exogenous enhancer for demand-oriented anaerobic digestion.
AhmedSKazdaM (2017) Characteristics of on-demand biogas production by using sugar beet silage. Anaerobe46: 114–121.
2.
Alavi-BorazjaniSACapelaITarelhoLA (2020) Over-acidification control strategies for enhanced biogas production from anaerobic digestion: A review. Biomass and Bioenergy143: 105833.
3.
AminFRKhalidHEl-MashadHM, et al. (2021) Functions of bacteria and archaea participating in the bioconversion of organic waste for methane production. Science of The Total Environment763: 143007.
4.
AquinoSFStuckeyDC (2004) The effect of organic and hydraulic shock loads on the production of soluble microbial products in anaerobic digesters. Water Environment Research76: 2628–2636.
5.
BudzianowskiWM (2016) A review of potential innovations for production, conditioning and utilization of biogas with multiple-criteria assessment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews54: 1148–1171.
6.
CananACalhanROzkaymakM (2021) Investigation of the effects of different slags as accelerant on anaerobic digestion and methane yield. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery11: 1395–1406.
7.
ChenLHuangJJHuaB, et al. (2020) Effect of steel slag in recycling waste activated sludge to produce anaerobic granular sludge. Chemosphere257: 127291.
8.
ChoiKSKondaveetiSMinB (2017) Bioelectrochemical methane (CH4) production in anaerobic digestion at different supplemental voltages. Bioresource Technology245: 826–832.
9.
De VriezeJHennebelTBoonN, et al. (2012) Methanosarcina: the rediscovered methanogen for heavy duty biomethanation. Bioresource Technology112: 1–9.
10.
DeenaSRKumarGVickramAS, et al. (2022) Efficiency of various biofilm carriers and microbial interactions with substrate in moving bed-biofilm reactor for environmental wastewater treatment. Bioresource Technology359: 127421.
11.
DittmerCOhnmachtBKrümpelJ, et al. (2022) Model predictive control: demand-orientated, load-flexible, full-scale biogas production. Microorganisms10: 804.
12.
DongYSanfordRABoyanovMI, et al. (2016) Orenia metallireducens sp. nov. strain Z6, a novel metal-reducing member of the phylum Firmicutes from the deep subsurface. Applied and Environmental Microbioloy82: 6440–6453.
13.
FengDXiaAHuangY, et al. (2022) Effects of carbon cloth on anaerobic digestion of high concentration organic wastewater under various mixing conditions. Journal of Hazardous Materials423: 127100.
14.
FengLHeSGaoZ, et al. (2023) Mechanisms, performance, and the impact on microbial structure of direct interspecies electron transfer for enhancing anaerobic digestion – A review. Science of The Total Environment862: 160813.
15.
FengLWardAJGuixéPG, et al. (2018) Flexible biogas production by pulse feeding maize silage or briquetted meadow grass into continuous stirred tank reactors. Biosystems Engineering174: 239–248.
16.
GaoLThangavelSGuoZC, et al. (2019) Hydrodynamics analysis for an upflow integrated anaerobic digestion reactor with microbial electrolysis under different hydraulic retention times: Effect of bioelectrode spatial distribution on functional communities involved in methane production and organic removal. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering8: 190–199.
17.
GeR (2020) Study on the effect of steel slag on the efficiency of anaerobic digestion and aerobic composting of municipal sludge. Master’s Thesis, Anhui University of Technology, Chine (in Chinese with English abstract).
18.
GiroudonMLavigneMPPatapyC, et al. (2021) Blast-furnace slag cement and metakaolin based geopolymer as construction materials for liquid anaerobic digestion structures: Interactions and biodeterioration mechanisms. Science of The Total Environment750: 141518.
19.
HahnHKrautkremerBHartmannK, et al. (2014) Review of concepts for a demand-driven biogas supply for flexible power generation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews29: 383–393.
20.
HanFYunSZhangC, et al. (2019) Steel slag as accelerant in anaerobic digestion for nonhazardous treatment and digestate fertilizer utilization. Bioresource Technology282: 331–338.
21.
HartshorneRSJepsonBNClarkeTA, et al. (2007) Characterization of Shewanella oneidensis MtrC: A cell-surface decaheme cytochrome involved in respiratory electron transport to extracellular electron acceptors. Journal of Biological Inorgic Chemistry12: 1083–1094.
22.
HijaziOTappenSEffenbergerM (2019) Environmental impacts concerning flexible power generation in a biogas production. Carbon Resources Conversion2: 117–125.
23.
HuangWZhaoZYuanT, et al. (2016) Effective ammonia recovery from swine excreta through dry anaerobic digestion followed by ammonia stripping at high total solids content. Biomass and Bioenergy90: 139–147.
24.
JiaTWangZShanH, et al. (2017) Effect of nanoscale zero-valent iron on sludge anaerobic digestion. Resources, Conservation and Recycling127: 190–195.
25.
JinBWangSXingL, et al. (2016) Long term effect of alkali types on waste activated sludge hydrolytic acidification and microbial community at low temperature. Bioresource Technology200: 587–597.
26.
JoYKimJHwangS, et al. (2015) Anaerobic treatment of rice winery wastewater in an upflow filter packed with steel slag under different hydraulic loading conditions. Bioresource Technology193: 53–61.
27.
KarabeyBDagliogluSTAzbarN, et al. (2019) Bacterial and archeal dynamics of a labscale HYBRID gas fermentation bioreactor fed with CO2 and H2. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A54: 1348–1355.
28.
KongDZhangKLiangJ, et al. (2019) Methanogenic community during the anaerobic digestion of different substrates and organic loading rates. MicrobiolOpen8: e00709.
29.
LafrattaMThorpeRBOukiSK, et al. (2020) Dynamic biogas production from anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge for on-demand electricity generation. Bioresource Technology310: 123415.
30.
LinRChengJZhangJ, et al. (2017) Boosting biomethane yield and production rate with graphene: The potential of direct interspecies electron transfer in anaerobic digestion. Bioresource Technology239: 345–352.
31.
LiuMWeiYLengX (2021) Improving biogas production using additives in anaerobic digestion: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production297: 126666.
32.
LüFLuoCShaoL, et al. (2016) Biochar alleviates combined stress of ammonium and acids by firstly enriching Methanosaeta and then Methanosarcina. Water Research90: 34–43.
33.
MaDGaoHWangJ, et al. (2021) Characterization of anaerobic methanogenic process in the goethite dosed continuous reactors under different pH. Energy Sources, Part. A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects1–11: 1895368.
34.
MaukyEJacobiHFLiebetrauJ, et al. (2015) Flexible biogas production for demand-driven energy supply-feeding strategies and types of substrates. Bioresource Technology178: 262–269.
35.
MontonenR (2018) Magnesium recovery from multimetal process streams. Master’s Thesis, Aalto University, Helsinki.
36.
OhnmachtBLemmerAOechsnerH, et al. (2021) Demand-oriented biogas production and biogas storage in digestate by flexibly feeding a full-scale biogas plant. Bioresource Technology332: 125099.
37.
ParkJHKangHJParkKH, et al. (2018) Direct interspecies electron transfer via conductive materials: a perspective for anaerobic digestion applications. Bioresource Technology254: 300–311.
38.
ParkSKimGBPandeyAK, et al. (2024) Prediction of total organic acids concentration based on FOS/TAC titration in continuous anaerobic digester fed with food waste using a deep neural network model. Biomass and Bioenergy190: 107411.
39.
QinFZhangFLuM, et al. (2024) Effect of magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes coupled with magnetic field on anaerobic digestion. Journal of Water Process Engineering63: 105396.
40.
SaadyNMCMasséDI (2015) Impact of organic loading rate on psychrophilic anaerobic digestion of solid dairy manure. Energies8: 1990–2007.
41.
SahuJNKapelyushinYMishraDP, et al. (2023) Utilization of ferrous slags as coagulants, filters, adsorbents, neutralizers/stabilizers, catalysts, additives, and bed materials for water and wastewater treatment: A review. Chemosphere325: 138201.
42.
SantosFSRicciBCNetaLSF, et al. (2017) Sugarcane vinasse treatment by two-stage anaerobic membrane bioreactor: Effect of hydraulic retention time on changes in efficiency, biogas production and membrane fouling. Bioresource Technology245: 342–350.
43.
ShaoQZhangQFangS, et al. (2022) Upgrading volatile fatty acids production from anaerobic co-fermentation of orange peel waste and sewage sludge: Critical roles of limonene on functional consortia and microbial metabolic traits. Bioresource Technology362: 127773.
44.
ShindeRHackulaAO’SheaR, et al. (2023) Demand-driven biogas production from Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactors to balance the power grid. Bioresource Technology385: 129364.
45.
SzarkaNScholwinFTrommlerM, et al. (2013) A novel role for bioenergy: A flexible, demand-oriented power supply. Energy61: 18–26.
46.
TomczakWFerrasseJHGiudici-OrticoniMT, et al. (2018) Effect of hydraulic retention time on a continuous biohydrogen production in a packed bed biofilm reactor with recirculation flow of the liquid phase. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy43: 18883–18895.
Van SteendamCSmetsISkerlosS, et al. (2019) Improving anaerobic digestion via direct interspecies electron transfer requires development of suitable characterization methods. Current Opinion in Biotechnology57: 183–190.
49.
WangXWangPMengX, et al. (2022) Performance and metagenomics analysis of anaerobic digestion of food waste with adding biochar supported nano zero-valent iron under mesophilic and thermophilic condition. Science of The Total Environment820: 153244.
50.
WeithmannNMlinarSSonnleitnerE, et al. (2021) Flexible feeding in anaerobic digestion-Impact on process stability, performance and microbial community structures. Anaerobe68: 102297.
51.
WuPBaiTYangY, et al. (2024) Feeding strategy determine flexible biogas via shaping microbial abundance and interaction in anaerobic digestion. Biomass and Bioenergy180: 107030.
52.
YanWMukherjeeMZhouY (2020) Direct interspecies electron transfer (DIET) can be suppressed under ammonia-stressed condition-reevaluate the role of conductive materials. Water Research183: 116094.
53.
YangGFangHWangJ, et al. (2019) Enhanced anaerobic digestion of up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) by blast furnace dust (BFD): Feasibility and mechanism. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy44; 17709–17719.
54.
YangGWangJZhangH, et al. (2019) Applying bio-electric field of microbial fuel cell-upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor catalyzed blast furnace dusting ash for promoting anaerobic digestion. Water Research149: 215–224.
55.
YeJHuARenG, et al. (2018) Enhancing sludge methanogenesis with improved redox activity of extracellular polymeric substances by hematite in red mud. Water Research134: 54–62.
56.
YinQGuMWuG (2020) Inhibition mitigation of methanogenesis processes by conductive materials: A critical review. Bioresource Technology317: 123977.
57.
YusufHHXiaofangPYeZL, et al. (2024) A novel strategy for enhancing high solid anaerobic digestion of fecal slag and food waste using percolate recirculation and dosage of nano zero-valent iron. Water Research267: 122477.
58.
ZhangJQuYQiQ, et al. (2020a) The bio-chemical cycle of iron and the function induced by ZVI addition in anaerobic digestion: A review. Water Research186: 116405.
59.
ZhangLLohKCLimJW, et al. (2019) Bioinformatics analysis of metagenomics data of biogas-producing microbial communities in anaerobic digesters: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews100: 110–126.
60.
ZhangLZhangJLohKC (2018) Activated carbon enhanced anaerobic digestion of food waste-Laboratory-scale and Pilot-scale operation. Waste Management75: 270–279.
61.
ZhangQCaoJWuY, et al. (2020b) Shifts of microbial community and metabolic function during food wastes and waste activated sludge co-fermentation in semi-continuous-flow reactors: Effects of fermentation substrate and zero-valent iron. Bioresource Technology313: 123686.
62.
ZhaoHLiJLiJ, et al. (2013) Organic loading rate shock impact on operation and microbial communities in different anaerobic fixed-bed reactors. Bioresource Technology140: 211–219.
63.
ZhongDLiJMaW, et al. (2020) Clarifying the synergetic effect of magnetite nanoparticles in the methane production process. Environmental Science and Pollution Research27: 17054–17062.
64.
ZhongYHeJZhangP, et al. (2022) Effects of different particle size of zero-valent iron (ZVI) during anaerobic digestion: performance and mechanism from genetic level. Chemical Engineering Journal435: 134977.
65.
ZouHGaoMWangQ, et al. (2018) Biogas recovery and yield improvement of acidification system by adding steel slag. Transactions of the Chinese Society Agricultural. Engineering34: 229–234 [In Chinese with English abstract].
