Effectively sorting and recycling waste has consequently emerged as a key strategy for environmental preservation and the creation of sustainable communities. The current study aimed to examine the factors influencing consumers’ intentions to sort household waste, utilizing the theory of planned behaviour. Collecting 300 responses from Brazilian consumers through structured questionnaires, the study employed a partial least square structural equation modelling approach to assess the proposed hypotheses. The findings emphasized the significant impact of the perceived cost and benefit factor, alongside the influence of information on proper waste disposal (perceived effectiveness), as communicated by entities managing selective waste collection. These findings emphasize the key role of effective communication from waste management agency regarding the outcomes of domestic waste separation efforts for recycling, as well as the perceived benefits and costs by consumers. Such communication is essential for fostering and maintaining consumer engagement in recycling initiatives.
AboelmagedMG (2020, April) Acceptance of E-waste recycling among young adults: An empirical study. In 2020 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Sustainability (SusTech) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.
2.
Adu-GyamfiGAsamoahANNketiahE, et al. (2023) Reducing waste management challenges: Empirical assessment of waste sorting intention among corporate employees in Ghana. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services72: 103261.
3.
AjzenI (1991) The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50: 179–211.
4.
AliFRasoolimaneshSMSarstedtM, et al. (2018) An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in hospitality research. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality30: 514–538.
5.
BotetzagiasIDimaAFMalesiosC (2015) Extending the theory of planned behaviour in the context of recycling: the role of moral norms and of demographic predictors. Resources, Conservation and Recycling95: 58–67.
6.
ChinWW (2010) How to write up and report PLS analyses. In: Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp.655–690.
7.
ChuPYChiuJF (2003) Factors influencing household waste recycling behaviour: Test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Social Psychology33: 604–626.
8.
CohenJ (1992) Statistical power analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science1: 98–101.
9.
CoronaBTunnVSvan den BroekKL (2024) Integrating consumer behaviour into the environmental assessment of circular packaging: A scoping review. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment29: 80–98.
10.
CorsiniFGusmerottiNMBartolettiE, et al. (2024) Addressing plastic concern: Behavioral insights into recycled plastic products and packaging in a circular economy. Circular Economy and Sustainability. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1007/s43615-024-00367-5.
11.
DemajorovicJMassoteB (2017) Sectoral agreement on packaging: Assessment based on extended producer responsibility. RAE57: 470–483.
12.
DeyPKMalesiosCDeD, et al. (2020) Circular economy to enhance sustainability of small and medium-sized enterprises. Business Strategy and the Environment29: 2145–2169.
13.
Dickella GamaralalagePJGhoshSKOnogawaK (2021) Source separation in municipal solid waste management: Practical means to its success in Asian cities. Waste Management & Research40: 0734242X211049606.
14.
EllenPSWienerJLCobb-WalgrenC (1991) The role of perceived consumer effectiveness in motivating environmentally conscious behaviours. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing10: 102–117.
15.
ErtzMAddarWOuerghemmiC, et al. (2023) Overview of factors influencing consumer engagement with plastic recycling. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment12: e493.
16.
FanBYangWShenX (2019) A comparison study of ‘motivation–intention–behaviour’ model on household solid waste sorting in China and Singapore. Journal of Cleaner Production211: 442–454.
17.
FangWHuangMChengB, et al. (2021) Applying a comprehensive action determination model to examine the recycling behaviour of Taipei city residents. Sustainability13: 1–18.
18.
FishbeinMAjzenI (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
19.
FornellCLarckerDF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18: 39–50.
20.
FreyBS (1993) Motivation as a limit to pricing. Journal of Economic Psychology14: 635–664.
21.
GuoFWangJSongY (2022) How to promote sustainable development of construction and demolition waste recycling systems: Production subsidies or consumption subsidies?Sustainable Production and Consumption32: 407–423.
22.
HairJFRisherJJSarstedtM.RingleCM (2019) When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Europe Business Review31: 2–24.
23.
HairJFSarstedtMRingleCM (2011) PLS-SEM: indeed, a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory Practice19: 139–152.
24.
HairJFSarstedtMRingleCM, et al. (2012) An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science40: 414–433.
25.
HairJFJr.HultGTMRingleCM, et al. (2021) A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications.
26.
HenselerJHubonaGRayPA (2016) Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems116: 2–20.
27.
HullandJ (1999) Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal20: 195–204.
28.
IslamMTJabberMASakibMN (2023) Application of revised theory of planned behaviour model to assess the readiness of circular economy in the RMG sector of Bangladesh. Journal of Cleaner Production420: 138428.
29.
JenWYHungMC (2010) An empirical study of adopting mobile healthcare service: the family’s perspective on the healthcare needs of their elderly members. Telemedicine and E-Health16: 41–48.
30.
JiaQIslamMSHossainMS, et al. (2023) Understanding residents’ behaviour intention of recycling plastic waste in a densely populated megacity of emerging economy. Heliyon9: e18921.
31.
KarakTBhagatRMBhattacharyyaP (2012) Municipal solid waste generation, composition, and management: The world scenario. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology42: 1509–1630.
32.
KasznikDŁapniewskaZ (2023) The end of plastic? The EU’s directive on single-use plastics and its implementation in Poland. Environmental Science & Policy145: 151–163.
33.
KautishPPaulJSharmaR (2019) The moderating influence of environmental consciousness and recycling intentions on green purchasing behaviour. Journal of Cleaner Production228: 1425–1436.
34.
KhanFAhmedWNajmiA (2019) Understanding consumers’ behaviour intentions towards dealing with the plastic waste: perspective of a developing country. Resources, Conservation and Recycling142: 49–58.
35.
KhanFAhmedWNajmiA, et al. (2009) Managing plastic waste disposal by assessing consumers’ recycling behaviour: the case of a densely populated developing country. Environmental Science and Pollution Research26: 33054–33066.
36.
KhanODaddiTSlabbinckH, et al. (2020) Assessing the determinants of intentions and behaviours of organizations towards a circular economy for plastics. Resources, Conservation and Recycling163: 105069.
37.
KhanOVaraksinaNHinterhuberA (2024) The influence of cultural differences on consumers’ willingness to pay more for sustainable fashion. Journal of Cleaner Production442: 141024.
38.
KimMJPetrickJF (2021) Roles of constraint and attachment in crowdfunder behaviour for sustainable development: An extended theory of planned behaviour. Sustainable Development29: 780–792.
39.
KökkılıçOMohammadi-JamSChuP, et al. (2022) Separation of plastic waste using froth flotation – An overview. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science308: 102769.
40.
LiuQXuQShenX, et al. (2022) The mechanism of household waste sorting behaviour: A study of Jiaxing, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health19: 2447.
41.
Loga (2024) São Paulo environmental logistics. Available at: https://www.loga.com.br/ (accessed May 2024).
42.
MurankoZAndrewsDNewtonEJ, et al. (2018) The pro-circular change model (P-CCM): Proposing a framework facilitating behavioural change towards a circular economy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 135: 132–140.
43.
NigburDLyonsEUzzellD (2010) Attitudes, norms, identity and environmental behaviour: using an expanded theory of planned behaviour to predict participation in a kerbside recycling program. British Journal of Social Psychology49: 259–284.
44.
NoorTJavidAHussainA, et al. (2020) Types, Sources and Management of Urban Wastes. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
45.
Oduro-AppiahKAffulAOsei-TutuH (2022) Assessment of belief constructs to support an intervention in municipal solid waste separation at the source in low middle-income countries: Observations from the Greater Accra Region of Ghana. Recycling7: 17.
46.
ÖlanderFThØgersenJ (1995) Understanding of consumer behaviour as a prerequisite for environmental protection. Journal of Consumer Policy8: 345–385.
47.
PapagiannakisGLioukasS (2012) Values, attitudes, and perceptions of managers as predictors of corporate environmental responsiveness. Journal of Environmental Management100: 41–51.
48.
PongpunpurtPMuensitthirojPPinitjitsamutP, et al. (2022) Studying waste separation behaviours and environmental impacts toward sustainable solid waste management: A case study of Bang Chalong Housing, Samut Prakan, Thailand. Sustainability14: 5040.
49.
QinBSongG (2022) Internal motivations, external contexts, and sustainable consumption behavior in China—Based on the TPB-ABC integration model. Sustainability14(13): 7677.
50.
QuDShevchenkoTShams EsfandabadiZ, et al. (2023) College students’ attitude towards waste separation and recovery on campus. Sustainability15: 1620.
51.
RamayahTLeeJWCLimS (2012) Sustaining the environment through recycling: An empirical study. Journal of Environmental Management102: 141–147.
52.
RanaJPaulJ (2017) Consumer behaviour and purchase intention for organic food: A review and research agenda. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services38: 157–165.
53.
Regulation (EU)2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2020 on the Establishment of a Framework to Facilitate Sustainable Investment and Amending Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 (OJ L 198, 22June 2020, pp.13–43). Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32020R0852&from=EN (accessed 3 May 2024).
54.
SantosaAAPrasetyoYTAlamsjahF, et al. (2022) How the COVID-19 pandemic affected the sustainable adoption of digital signature: An Integrated factors analysis model. Sustainability14(7): 4281.
55.
SchwartzSH (1977) Normative influences on altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology10: 221–279.
56.
ShevchenkoTSaidaniMRanjbariM, et al. (2023) Consumer behavior in the circular economy: Developing a product-centric framework. Journal of Cleaner Production384: 135568.
57.
ShiKZhouYZhangZ (2021) Mapping the research trends of household waste recycling: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainability13: 6029.
58.
SinghMPChakrabortyARoyM (2018) Developing an extended theory of planned behaviour model to explore circular economy readiness in manufacturing MSMEs, India. Resources, Conservation and Recycling135: 313–322.
59.
SkinnerEALe BusqueBDorrianJ, et al. (2023) Sustainable fashion on Instagram: A content and network analysis of user-generated posts. Journal of Consumer Behaviour22: 1096–1111.
60.
SternPCKirkpatrickEM (1977) Energy behaviour: Conservation without coercion. Environment10: 10–15.
61.
SuksanguanUSiwadamrongpongSChampahomT, et al. (2022) Structural equation model of factors influencing the selection of industrial waste disposal service in cement kiln. Sustainability14: 4109.
62.
TangDCaiXNketiahE, et al. (2023) Separate your waste: A comprehensive conceptual framework investigating residents’ intention to adopt household waste separation. Sustainable Production and Consumption39: 216–229.
63.
TianMChenYPuB, et al. (2022) The influence of internal motivation and external publicity on consumers’ waste sorting behaviour. Waste Management & Research40: 393–401.
64.
TongXNikolicIDijkhuizenB, et al. (2018) Behaviour changes in post-consumer recycling: Applying agent-based modeling in social experiments. Journal of Cleaner Production187: 1006–1013.
65.
Tricycle (2024) Tricycle loyalty program. Available at: https://triciclo.eco.br/ (accessed May 2024).
66.
Van der LaanAZAurisicchioM (2019) Archetypical consumer roles in closing the loops of resource flows for fast-moving consumer goods. Journal of Cleaner Production236: 117475.
67.
Vidal-AyusoFAkhmedovaAJacaC (2023) The circular economy and consumer behaviour: Literature review and research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production 137824.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
