Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study addresses the urgent issue of water pollution caused by iron (Fe) and manganese (Mn) ions. It introduces an innovative approach using graphene oxide (GO) and GO-decorated polyethersulphone (PES) membranes to efficiently remove these ions from contaminated water. The process involves integrating GO into PES membranes to enhance their adsorption capacity. Characterization techniques, including scanning electron microscopy, Fourier-transform infrared, and contact angle measurements, were used to assess structural and surface properties. The modified membranes demonstrated significantly improved adsorption compared to pristine PES. Notably, they achieved over 94% removal of Mn²⁺ and 93.6% of Fe²⁺ in the first filtration cycle for water with an initial concentration of 100 ppm. Continuous filtration for up to five cycles maintained removal rates above 60%. This research advances water purification materials, offering a promising solution for heavy metal ion removal. GO-decorated PES membranes may find application in large-scale water treatment, addressing environmental and public health concerns.

Keywords

Heavy metal ions GO polyethersulphone membranes water purification Fe and Mn uptake surface modification adsorption

Introduction

The contamination of water sources by heavy metal ions, particularly iron (Fe) and manganese (Mn), has emerged as a global concern due to its profound impact on environmental ecosystems and public health (Fernandez-Luqueno et al., 2013; Mukherjee et al., 2021; Shen et al., 2023; Yang et al., 2022). The escalation of industrial activities, mining operations and urbanization has unleashed a torrent of heavy metals into aquatic systems, resulting in severe pollution that jeopardizes ecosystems and human well-being (Danielopol et al., 2003; Jin et al., 2022; Meng et al., 2022). Traditional methods for heavy metal removal from polluted water, such as precipitation, coagulation and membrane filtration, often grapple with limitations in terms of efficiency and cost-effectiveness (Punia et al., 2022). Consequently, there is an urgent call for innovative and effective technologies to combat this challenge.

In recent years, membrane-based separation processes have risen to prominence in the realm of water purification, owing to their exceptional selectivity, cost-efficiency and operational simplicity (Jin et al., 2022; Lee et al., 2016). Membrane filtration, in particular, offers the advantage of continuous operation, which not only minimizes energy consumption but also guarantees a consistent and efficient purification process (Lee et al., 2016). This technology has witnessed remarkable advancements in materials and techniques, establishing itself as an indispensable component in diverse industrial processes, notably in wastewater treatment (Zhang and Chung, 2017; Ren et al., 2023).

Within the spectrum of materials employed for membrane construction, polymeric polymers, including cellulose, polyamide and polyethersulphone (PES), have gained popularity due to their porous structure, mechanical resilience and cost-effectiveness (Huang et al., 2015; Yadav et al., 2020). Among these, PES membranes have emerged as promising candidates for water treatment applications, primarily because of their high durability and permeability (Huang et al., 2015; Ganesh et al., 2013; Jin et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2022). However, a persistent challenge remains in augmenting the adsorption capacity and selectivity of PES membranes for heavy metal ions.

One promising avenue to enhance membrane adsorption properties is surface modification using nanomaterials. The integration of nanomaterials into polymeric membranes has shown great potential in addressing the limitations associated with conventional polymeric membranes, making them more adept at removing heavy metal ions and other contaminants. These nanomaterials, such as GO, carbon nanotubes and various nanoparticles, endow membranes with improved properties, including enhanced adsorption capacity, mechanical strength and hydrophilicity. Through these innovations, membrane technology has become a frontrunner in the quest for efficient heavy metal ion removal from water sources.

Nevertheless, polymeric membranes do have their inherent challenges, including suboptimal separation performance, limited water permeability, susceptibility to fouling and reduced lifespan (Ganesh et al., 2013; Hu and Mi, 2013). To surmount these obstacles, various strategies have been explored. One approach involves the incorporation of additives that enhance membrane hydrophilicity and water permeability. These modifications aim to mitigate the limitations associated with conventional polymeric membranes, paving the way for more effective heavy metal ion removal technologies.

GO, a derivative of graphene, is a versatile nanomaterial celebrated for its diverse properties and applications (Ganesh et al., 2013; Hu and Mi, 2013; Wang et al., 2022). With the two-dimensional structure, consisting of a single layer of carbon atoms arranged in a hexagonal lattice, GO boasts a substantial surface area. This extensive surface area is a boon for applications such as adsorption, catalysis and sensing, as it provides ample active sites for interactions (Wang et al., 2022). What sets GO apart is its exceptional flexibility when assembled into thin films or membranes (Hu and Mi, 2013). This attribute proves invaluable in applications like flexible electronics, sensors and barrier materials, as these films readily conform to diverse surfaces and structures (Marcano et al., 2010). Although thermal conductivity of GO is not as remarkable as pristine graphene, it still outperforms many materials, making it beneficial for heat management in electronics (Huang et al., 2011). GO’s impermeable structure equips it to serve as an effective barrier material, proficiently obstructing the passage of gases and liquids. This feature is indispensable in gas and liquid separation, packaging materials and protective coatings, where impermeability is paramount. GO is equally impressive in terms of mechanical properties. Its high tensile strength and stiffness, attributable to the covalent carbon-carbon bonds in the graphene lattice, render it a valuable candidate for reinforcing composite materials. Although GO’s electron mobility is generally lower than that of pristine graphene due to the presence of oxygen-containing functional groups, it still exhibits relatively high electron mobility compared to many other materials. This quality is pivotal in electronic applications like field-effect transistors and sensors. It is noteworthy that properties of GO can be tailored for specific applications through chemical functionalization and material engineering. This adaptability makes it a prized material in fields such as materials science, electronics, energy storage and environmental engineering. Figure 1 illustrates various properties of GO (Ganesh et al., 2013; Hu and Mi, 2013; Huang et al., 2011; Marcano et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2022).

Figure 1.

Some common properties of GO.

Several studies have illuminated the potential of GO-based composite membranes in addressing water contamination challenges (Cui et al., 2022; Hussain et al., 2023; Kamalam et al., 2023; Liu et al., 2020). For instance, the integration of GO into PES membranes has demonstrated improved salt and dye rejection percentages (Anand et al., 2018; Goyat et al., 2022a, 2022b; Koulivand et al., 2020). In line with these developments, the present study endeavours to harness the advantages of GO to engineer enhanced PES-based microfiltration membranes using the phase inversion technique (Gao et al., 2013; Kim et al., 2016; Wei et al., 2018).

This study aims to synthesize and characterize GO-decorated PES membranes and evaluate their efficiency in removing heavy metal ions, specifically Fe and Mn, from contaminated water. The surface modification of PES membranes with GO is anticipated to enhance their adsorption capacity, improving the overall efficiency of heavy metal ion removal compared to pristine PES membranes.

It is important to note that our research contributes to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), specifically SDG 6, which focuses on ensuring the availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all. Thus, this research is achieving SDG 6 by providing an innovative solution for the removal of heavy metal ions, particularly iron (Fe) and manganese (Mn), from contaminated water sources. The use of GO-decorated PES membranes enhances the efficiency of water purification processes, supporting the sustainable management of water resources, which is a key component of SDG 6. By developing advanced materials like GO-decorated PES membranes, we are contributing to a more sustainable and circular approach to water treatment. These membranes can be used repeatedly, reducing the need for disposable filters and promoting the reuse and recycling of materials in the water purification process.

Therefore, through detailed characterization and adsorption experiments, this research seeks to provide valuable insights into the development of advanced membrane materials for efficient removal of heavy metal ions from contaminated water. The outcomes of this study could significantly contribute to addressing environmental pollution and ensuring access to clean and safe water resources, thus emphasizing the importance of this research in addressing a critical global challenge.

Experimental details

Materials

PES obtained from BASF Germany constituted the polymer matrix for the membranes. All chemicals employed were of analytical reagent (AR) grade and procured from Sigma-Aldrich, including natural graphite powder, concentrated sulphuric acid (H₂SO₄), orthophosphoric acid (H₃PO₄), hydrochloric acid (HCl), potassium permanganate (KMnO₄), hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), ethanol (C₂H₅OH) and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF). These reagents and solvents were used without further purification.

Synthesis of GO

The synthesis of GO was achieved by converting graphite powder into GO through a modified Hummers process as shown in Figure 2 (Goyat et al., 2022b; Marcano et al., 2010). Initially, 1 g of graphite powder was introduced into a mixture of concentrated acids (H₂SO₄, 45 mL/H₃PO₄, 5 mL). Subsequently, 6 g of KMnO₄ was gradually added to the solution, which was then stirred for 10 hours on a hot plate at 60°C. After cooling to room temperature, 250 mL of ice-cold water was carefully added to the solution. To prevent further oxidation, 10 mL of H₂O₂ was added (Marcano et al., 2010). The resulting product was filtered, washed with distilled water, air-dried and stored for further use.

Figure 2.

Visual observations of graphite powder before oxidation and GO after oxidation.

Preparation of PES/GO nanocomposite membranes

The fabrication of PES/GO nanocomposite membranes utilized the phase inversion technique (Junaidi et al., 2018, 2019). To initiate the creation of PES/GO nanocomposite membranes, a PES solution was prepared by dissolving 1000 mg of PES pellets in DMF at 60°C. Separately, 10 mg of GO was dispersed in 10 mL of DMF and subjected to ultrasonication using a Ultasonic Probe sonicator for 30 minutes to exfoliate the GO sheets. The GO suspension was then added to the PES solution at 60°C and stirred for 4 hours at room temperature. The resultant nanocomposite slurry was casted onto a glass plate using a doctor blade. The nanocomposite membrane was formed by swiftly immersing the glass plate in deionized water. Afterward, the membranes were washed and air-dried in an oven.

Characterization of GO and embedded membrane

The synthesized material’s characteristics were assessed using a ultraviolet–visible (UV–-Vis) spectrophotometer. Chemical structural features, morphology and functional groups present in the material were examined using FTIR spectroscopy and field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM). Hydrophilicity was assessed through contact angle measurements, whereas pore size analysis and morphological examination were performed to understand membrane properties.

Heavy metal ion uptake via filtration setup

The efficiency of the GO-embedded PES membranes in capturing heavy metal ions (HMIs) was evaluated through filtration experiments. The filtration process was carried out over four to five cycles to gage the membrane’s performance. In each cycle, 2.0 L of water was passed through the membrane. Following each cycle, the membranes were cleansed with deionized water to eliminate any residual solution, rendering them ready for subsequent cycles.

Heavy metal uptake study

Stock solutions of Fe²⁺ and Mn²⁺ HMIs at 1000 ppm were prepared using ferric chloride and manganese acetate, respectively, in 1000 mL of deionized water. These stock solutions were further diluted to obtain 100 ppm solutions. The pH of the solutions was adjusted using H₂SO₄ and NaOH solutions. At ambient temperature, the diluted solutions were subjected to filtration through the prepared membrane using a filtration assembly. The removal of Fe²⁺ and Mn²⁺ HMIs in the permeate was quantified using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer. The percentage removal of metal ions was calculated using equation (1):

% Removal = [\frac{C_{i} - C_{e}}{C_{i}}] \times 100

(1)

where, C_i and C_e denote the initial and final concentrations of metal ions in the solution, respectively.

Results and discussion

Characterization of GO and its embedded membrane

Spectroscopic and morphological characterizations of GO

The successful synthesis of GO was confirmed through various spectroscopic techniques, shedding light on its structural attributes. UV–Vis spectroscopy unveiled the characteristic absorbance peaks associated with π→π* transitions in conjugated systems (Liu et al., 2022; Yadav and Lochab, 2019). The absorption peak observed at λmax = 226 nm (Figure 3(a)) corroborated the occurrence of π→π* transitions within the conjugated GO structure. Notably, another shoulder peak at λmax = 300 nm could be attributed to the n→π* transitions of carbonyl groups (Liu et al., 2022; Yadav and Lochab, 2019). The FTIR spectroscopy spectrum underscored the effective oxidation of graphite into GO. Figure 3(b) exhibits the typical FTIR spectrum of the prepared GO. The presence of distinctive peaks confirmed the emergence of oxygen-containing moieties in GO (Aliyev et al., 2019). The O-H stretching and bending vibrations manifested as a broad peak at 3344 cm⁻¹, while a sharp peak at 1690 cm⁻¹ corresponded to carbonyl groups. C-H stretching vibrations were evident at 2917 cm−¹, while C=O and C=C stretching vibrations appeared at 1728 and 1624 cm⁻¹, respectively. The band at 1050 cm⁻¹ was indicative of C-O stretching vibrations, validating the successful oxidation process (Aliyev et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2022).

Figure 3.

Typical (a) UV–Vis spectrum, (b) FTIR spectrum, (c, d) FESEM, and (e, f) transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of as-prepared GO nanosheets.

FESEM was harnessed to delve into the intricate morphology of the synthesized GO, unravelling its structural intricacies. The FESEM images depicted a sheet-like structure marked by a substantial surface area (Figure 3(c and d)). The creases and folds scattered across the GO surfaces imparted a distinct crumpled appearance, reminiscent of layered structures. This unique morphology alluded to the stacked arrangement of GO layers, contributing to its multi-layer configuration (Huang et al., 2011). With a well-characterized GO structure in hand, the material was seamlessly integrated into the membrane matrix, laying the groundwork for subsequent morphological, hydrophilicity, and porosity investigations. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) observations provide valuable insights into the structural properties of the GO. The TEM images presented in Figure 3(e and f) offer a comprehensive view of the prepared GO. Through these TEM images, we gain valuable insights into the intricate morphological attributes of the GO (Dave et al., 2016). Notably, the images distinctly showcase the characteristic appearance of GO, which adopt a flake-like configuration with a transparent nature. Upon closer examination, it becomes evident that the surfaces of the GO display a textured and nuanced structure. This is particularly evident through the presence of visible wrinkles and folds that are distributed randomly across the GO framework (Goyat et al., 2022b). Furthermore, the observed size distribution of the GONs falls within the micrometer scale, aligning with the intended nanosheet morphology. This consistency in size further supports the successful synthesis and formation of the desired GON structure (Aliyev et al., 2019; Dave et al., 2016; Goyat et al., 2022b; Marcano et al., 2010).

Morphological and compositional characterizations of GO-PES membrane

Leveraging FESEM, a deeper dive into the morphological traits of the GO-embedded PES membrane was undertaken (Figure 4(a and b)) (Junaidi et al., 2018, 2019; Kim et al., 2016). The membrane exhibited a remarkable porous architecture adorned with numerous micro-scale pores, a structural design that magnified its hydrophilicity and facilitated enhanced water flux (Junaidi et al., 2018). The incorporation of GO was notably correlated with an elevation in pore count and size within the membrane structure, effectively contributing to the amplification of water permeability and filtration efficiency (Junaidi et al., 2018, 2019; Kim et al., 2016). Further, the UV–Vis spectrum of GO-decorated PES would likely show characteristics about peaks or transitions among the conjugated systems. Herein, GO exhibits a distinct UV–Vis adsorption peak around 258 nm. This peak arises from the π→π* transitions within the GO structure. Concurrently, in the context of the PES membrane, the presence of a UV–Vis adsorption peak around 290 nm is anticipated. This peak is attributed to the aromatic rings within the PES structure (Figure 2(c)) (Ly et al., 2020; Khan et al., 2016). The positions of the peaks may vary due to some factors such as degree of decoration and experimental compositions.

Figure 4.

Typical (a, b) FESEM Images, (c) UV–Vis spectrum, and (d) FTIR spectrum of as-prepared PES-GO membrane.

The FTIR analysis of the prepared membrane was imperative in deciphering its chemical composition and the intricate web of functional groups adorning its surface (Figure 4(d)). While the major peaks were attributed to PES, which is the base material used for the membrane fabrication, the spectrum revealed additional signatures. Prominent absorption bands at 1158 and 1100 cm⁻¹ corresponded to the symmetric and asymmetric absorption of -SO₂ groups, characteristic of the membrane’s composition (Belfer et al., 2000; Klaysom et al., 2011). Furthermore, peaks within the spectral range of 3300–3400 cm⁻¹ were indicative of hydroxyl moieties within the GO functional groups. The FTIR analysis effectively underscored the successful integration of GO into the membrane’s structure (Belfer et al., 2000; Klaysom et al., 2011).

Hydrophilicity and porosity analysis

Hydrophilicity assessment is crucial for membrane functionality, primarily governed by contact angle measurements. The prepared membrane’s contact angle was determined after drying at 25°C for 2 hours. The contact angle of water droplets on the GO-embedded PES membrane’s surface was measured using a goniometer. Traditionally, pure PES membranes have been recognized as hydrophobic, restricting water passage (Ahmad et al., 2013; Fu and Zhang, 2019). In contrast, the contact angle of the GO-PES membrane was 64°, indicative of its hydrophilic nature. This alteration resulted from the addition of GO, which effectively reduced the contact angle, thus conferring hydrophilicity to the membrane. Consequently, incorporation of GO particles augmented water flux, pore size, permeability, and hydrophilicity, enhancing the membrane’s filtration performance (Ahmad et al., 2013; Fu and Zhang, 2019). This behaviour could be attributed to the presence of oxygen-containing polar moieties, particularly carbonyl groups, on the GO surface, as validated by FTIR spectra (Goyat et al., 2022b; Marcano et al., 2010). Ultimately, the membrane met the requisite criteria for efficient water filtration, primarily attributed to its newfound hydrophilic behaviour.

Uptake of HMIs via filtration assembly using GO-PES membrane

The synthesized GO-embedded PES membranes were subjected to a rigorous investigation, assessing their efficacy in the uptake of HMIs, particularly Fe²⁺ and Mn²⁺metal ions. Employing a tailored filtration assembly, a series of experiments were conducted to ascertain the membrane’s prowess in removing these potentially hazardous metal ions from solution. The experiments involved the filtration of 100 ppm concentrations of Fe²⁺ and Mn²⁺ metal ion solutions consecutively through the GO-PES membrane using filtration assembly. The collected permeate samples, segregated into 100.0 mL portions, were meticulously analysed for residual metal ion concentrations.

The assessment of the percentage removal efficiency was facilitated through the utilization of Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS), a robust analytical technique known for its precision and accuracy in quantifying trace elements within a sample (Anwar et al., 2019; Das et al., 2009). The AAS analysis allowed for the determination of the percentage removal of Fe²⁺ and Mn²⁺ ions in the permeate after each filtration cycle. This sequential evaluation enabled insights into the membrane’s capacity to effectively capture and retain HMIs over multiple filtration iterations.

The initial filtration cycle yielded striking results, with the GO-PES membrane exhibiting remarkable efficiency in the removal of Fe²⁺ and Mn²⁺ ions. The percentage removal efficiency after the first cycle was noted to be 94% for Mn²⁺ ions and an impressive 93.6% for Fe²⁺ ions. These findings are indeed noteworthy, signifying the membrane’s efficacy in conserving heavy metals from the filtration process. The ability of the GO-PES membrane to achieve such substantial removal rates underscores its potential as an effective medium for the treatment of metal-laden waters.

Figure 5 visually encapsulates the dynamic behaviour of the membrane’s performance over subsequent filtration cycles. The presented graph highlights the percentage removal of HMIs as a function of filtration cycles. As the cycles progress, a gradual reduction in the efficiency of heavy metal absorption is evident (Chai et al., 2021). This reduction can be attributed to factors such as the clogging of membrane pores or the saturation of active surface sites on the membrane’s structure (Al-Amoudi and Lovitt, 2007; Lalia et al., 2013; Purkait et al., 2018). The diminishing removal efficiency highlights the importance of periodic membrane maintenance and regeneration to ensure consistent and sustained performance throughout extended filtration processes.

Figure 5.

Graph showing the percentage removal of the HMIs.

The outcomes of these filtration experiments substantiate the GO-embedded PES membrane’s efficacy in heavy metal ion removal, providing a solid foundation for its potential application in water purification and treatment scenarios. The demonstrated conservation rates for Fe²⁺ and Mn²⁺ ions underscore the membrane’s relevance in addressing environmental contamination arising from heavy metal pollution. However, further investigations could delve into exploring the membrane’s performance against a broader spectrum of HMIs and evaluating its robustness in real-world water treatment applications. Moreover, optimizing membrane regeneration techniques could potentially mitigate the decline in removal efficiency observed across filtration cycles, enhancing the membrane’s overall sustainability and longevity in practical scenarios.

Table 1 presents a comparative assessment of composite membranes in terms of their effectiveness in removing various metal ions from water. It is evident that the amalgamation of distinct materials in these composite membranes results in varied metal ion removal efficiencies. Prior research endeavours involving diverse polymer types combined with different composites have yielded membranes with removal capacities ranging from 60% to 86% (Alotaibi et al., 2021; Ibrahim et al., 2022; Karki and Ingole, 2022; Marjani et al., 2020). However, the present study introduces a novel approach by incorporating GO into a PES matrix, demonstrating exceptional performance in the removal of metal ions.

Table 1.

Comparative heavy metal ion removal efficiency of the composite membranes.

S. No.	Material used for membrane	Metals removed	Metal removal (%)	Ref.
1	Graphene oxide-manganese oxide (GO-MnO₂) nanohybrid sulphonated polyethersulphone (SPES) ultrafiltration (UF) membranes	Cu²⁺ Zn²⁺ Ni²⁺	81.1%64.0%67.4%	Ibrahim et al. (2022)
2	Polyamide titanium dioxide (PA-TiO₂)	Cu²⁺ Hg²⁺ Pb²⁺	86.89 ± 2%77.01 ± 2%83.42 ± 1.5%	Karki and Ingole (2022)
3	Graphene oxide–polyethersulphone (GO–PES)	Cu²⁺ Zn²⁺ Cd²⁺	About 65%–80% for all the metal ions	Marjani et al. (2020)
4	Polysulphone-surface functionalized mesoporous silica nanocomposite membranes	Cd²⁺ Zn²⁺	91%94%	Alotaibi et al. (2021)
5	GO–PES	Mn²⁺ Fe²⁺	94%93.6%	Present study

In this study, we synthesized and incorporated GO into the PES membrane, showcasing remarkable results. The developed composite membrane exhibited exceptional heavy metal ion removal efficiency, with an astounding 94% removal rate for Mn ions and an impressive 93.6% for Fe ions in the initial filtration cycle. Notably, the membrane’s performance remained consistently high even after five consecutive filtration cycles, retaining a metal removal capacity of 50%. These results underscore the superior capability of the GO-decorated PES membrane to effectively remove HMIs from contaminated water sources, outperforming many other composite membranes previously reported in the literature. The outstanding performance of this novel composite membrane holds promise for its practical application in water treatment processes and environmental remediation, addressing critical challenges related to heavy metal ion pollution in water bodies. This significant advancement in membrane technology highlights the potential of the GO-PES composite membrane to contribute to the development of efficient and sustainable solutions for water purification and environmental protection. The study represents a significant step forward in the quest for innovative materials that can address the pressing global issue of heavy metal contamination in water sources.

Mechanism underlying HMI adsorption

The adsorption process of HMIs onto the GO decorated PES membrane is intricately governed by a complex interplay of diverse interactions, ultimately leading to highly efficient metal ion removal (Ayub and Othman, 2023). GO, renowned for its extensive specific surface area and the presence of diverse functional groups, such as epoxy, carboxy, and keto moieties, exhibits remarkable versatility in its interactions with metal ions (Goyat et al., 2022b; Marcano et al., 2010). These interactions encompass electrostatic attraction, complexation, and chemical bonding, collectively orchestrating the multifaceted adsorption phenomenon. The unique surface properties of the PES membrane further contribute to the stability and dispersion of GO particles, thereby synergistically optimizing the uptake of HMIs from water sources (Ayub and Othman, 2023; Giwa and Hasan, 2020).

The remarkable properties of GO play a pivotal role in the adsorption mechanism. The vast surface area inherent to GO nanosheets provides an abundance of binding sites for metal ions. The functional groups present on GO, particularly the epoxy, carboxy, and keto moieties, actively participate in intricate interactions with metal ions (Ayub and Othman, 2023; Giwa and Hasan, 2020; Khan et al., 2021; Moradi et al., 2020). Electrostatic forces come into play as metal ions are drawn toward the charged functional groups residing on the surface of GO (Moradi et al., 2020). Furthermore, the capacity of these functional groups to form coordination complexes with metal ions results in the phenomenon of complexation (Blesa et al., 2000). This complexation interaction involves the reversible binding of metal ions to the functional groups, significantly contributing to the efficient removal of HMIs (Blesa et al., 2000).

The complex interplay of these interactions creates a dynamic equilibrium between metal ions in the solution and those adsorbed on the GO-decorated PES membrane. This equilibrium ensures the continual adsorption of HMIs from the surrounding water, ultimately leading to the high efficiency observed in our study. Moreover, the intrinsic properties of the PES membrane, including its porous structure and enhanced hydrophilicity, further enhance the overall adsorption process. The collaborative effect of GO and PES in optimizing the adsorption mechanism sheds light on the immense potential of these composite membranes as efficient adsorbents for heavy metal removal from water sources. This understanding not only advances the field of water purification but also offers promising solutions for environmental remediation and the protection of ecosystems.

Furthermore, functional groups on GO can form covalent bonds with metal ions, leading to their immobilization on the membrane surface (Ahmad et al., 2020; Duru et al., 2016). The strong binding resulting from these chemical interactions ensures the stability of the adsorbed metal ions. Here, the intricate chemical interactions that transpire between the GO surface and the HMIs in the water encompass various chemical forces, including but not limited to electrostatic attractions, coordination bonding, and complexation phenomena. These mechanisms contribute to the overall adsorption process, where HMIs are effectively captured by the GO-modified PES membrane (Moradi et al., 2020). The significance of the strong binding resulting from these chemical interactions lies in the stability it confers to the adsorbed metal ions on the surface of the membrane (Blesa et al., 2000). This stability is pivotal for preventing the desorption or release of these metal ions back into the water phase. Therefore, this is crucial for preventing their desorption back into the water phase (Ahmad et al., 2020; Blesa et al., 2000; Moradi et al., 2020).

The introduction of GO into the PES matrix establishes a mutually beneficial relationship, with each material enhancing the performance of the other. The PES membrane’s intrinsic characteristics, such as its surface morphology and hydrophilicity, create an ideal environment for the dispersion and attachment of GO particles. The porous structure of the membrane acts as a scaffold, effectively preventing the aggregation of GO and bolstering its stability during the adsorption process. This synergistic collaboration between GO and PES culminates in a substantial enhancement of the composite membrane’s adsorption efficiency (Ahmad et al., 2020; Blesa et al., 2000; Duru et al., 2016; Khan et al., 2021; Moradi et al., 2020).

The adsorption of HMIs onto the GO-decorated PES membrane is a multifaceted process characterized by intricate interactions. The exceptional specific surface area of GO, its functional groups, and its electrostatic properties work in harmony to facilitate the efficient capture of metal ions through a combination of electrostatic attraction, complexation, and chemical bonding (Ahmad et al., 2020; Blesa et al., 2000; Duru et al., 2016; Khan et al., 2021; Lim et al., 2017; Moradi et al., 2020). The integration of GO with the PES membrane not only optimizes the stability and uniform dispersion of GO but also significantly augments the overall adsorption capacity.

This comprehensive insight into the adsorption mechanism provides valuable clarity on the potential of GO-PES composite membranes as highly effective adsorbents for the removal of heavy metals from water sources. It offers promising solutions for water purification and environmental remediation, addressing the critical need to combat water pollution and protect ecosystems (Banti et al., 2020; Lim et al., 2017; Naddeo et al., 2023; Tsangas et al., 2023; Zorpas et al., 2021).

By elucidating the synergistic relationship between GO and PES and the intricate mechanisms governing heavy metal ion adsorption, our research contributes to the advancement of efficient and sustainable water treatment technologies, aligning with the global imperative for clean and safe water resources.

Conclusions

This study successfully synthesized GO through an improved Hummer’s method and integrated it into a PES membrane matrix. The investigation into GO-decorated PES membranes for the removal of HMIs, specifically iron (Fe) and manganese (Mn), from contaminated water has yielded promising results and significant insights. Characterization techniques including scanning electron microscopy (SEM), FTIR spectroscopy and ultraviolet–visible (UV–Vis) spectroscopy confirmed the successful GO synthesis. The distinct λ max = 226 nm in the UV–Vis spectra indicated π→π* transitions in conjugated GO, whereas FTIR spectra demonstrated proper oxidation through OH stretching and bending vibrations. The GO-embedded PES membrane was prepared using the phase inversion technique, revealing a porous surface with tiny pores in SEM analysis. This microstructure enhanced hydrophilicity and water flux. A reduced water contact angle validated the membrane’s hydrophilic nature, attributed to GO’s oxygen-containing functional groups. The membrane’s performance in heavy metal ion removal was remarkable. With an initial 100 ppm concentration, the GO-embedded PES membrane exhibited impressive efficacy, conserving over 94% of Mn²⁺ ions and 93.6% of Fe²⁺ ions in the first filtration cycle. Across subsequent cycles, more than 60% removal of HMIs was sustained. The filtration experiments confirmed the enhanced efficiency of GO-decorated PES membranes in removing Fe and Mn ions from contaminated water. The modified membranes exhibited superior filtration capacities compared to pristine PES membranes, underscoring the significance of surface modification in augmenting the removal of HMIs. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the successful synthesis, integration and application of GO-embedded PES membranes for efficient removal of HMIs from water. This work contributes to the advancement of water purification technologies, offering a tangible pathway towards ensuring access to clean and safe water resources, thereby addressing a critical environmental and public health challenge.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The authors are thankful to the Deanship of Scientific Research at Najran University, Najran, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for funding under the Research Group funding programme Grant no. NU/RG/SERC/12/36.

ORCID iD

Sotirios Baskoutas

References

Ahmad

Abdulkarim

Ooi

, et al. (2013) Recent development in additives modifications of polyethersulfone membrane for flux enhancement. Chemical Engineering Journal 223: 246–267.

Ahmad

SZN

Salleh

WNW

Ismail

, et al. (2020) Adsorptive removal of heavy metal ions using graphene-based nanomaterials: Toxicity, roles of functional groups and mechanisms. Chemosphere 248: 126008.

Al-Amoudi

Lovitt

(2007) Fouling strategies and the cleaning system of NF membranes and factors affecting cleaning efficiency. Journal of Membrane Science 303: 4–28.

Aliyev

Filiz

Khan

, et al. (2019) Structural characterization of graphene oxide: Surface functional groups and fractionated oxidative debris. Nanomaterials 9: 1180.

Alotaibi

Shukla

Mrad

, et al. (2021) Fabrication of polysulfone-surface functionalized mesoporous silica nanocomposite membranes for removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater. Membranes 11: 935.

Anand

Unnikrishnan

Mao

J-Y

, et al. (2018) Graphene-based nanofiltration membranes for improving salt rejection, water flux and antifouling—A review. Desalination 429: 119–133.

Anwar

Shafique

Salman

, et al. (2010) Removal of Pb (II) and Cd (II) from water by adsorption on peels of banana. Bioresource Technology 101: 1752–1755.

Ayub

Othman

MHD

(2023) Graphene oxide-based nanofiltration membranes for separation of heavy metals. In: Ahmad

Jawaid

Kumar

(eds.) Emerging Techniques for Treatment of Toxic Metals from Wastewater. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, pp. 231–288.

Banti

Tsangas

Samaras

, et al. (2020) LCA of a membrane bioreactor compared to activated sludge system for municipal wastewater treatment. Membranes 10: 421.

10.

Belfer

Fainchtain

Purinson

, et al. (2000) Surface characterization by FTIR-ATR spectroscopy of polyethersulfone membranes-unmodified, modified and protein fouled. Journal of Membrane Science 172: 113–124.

11.

Blesa

Weisz

Morando

, et al. (2000) The interaction of metal oxide surfaces with complexing agents dissolved in water. Coordination Chemistry Reviews 196: 31–63.

12.

Chai

Cheun

Kumar

, et al. (2021) A review on conventional and novel materials towards heavy metal adsorption in wastewater treatment application. Journal of Cleaner Production 296: 126589.

13.

Cui

Hou

Hussain

, et al. (2022) Study on innovative flexible design method for thin film narrow band-pass filters. Journal of Nanoelectronics and Optoelectronics 17: 112–120.

14.

Danielopol

Griebler

Gunatilaka

, et al. (2003) Present state and future prospects for groundwater ecosystems. Environmental Conservation 30: 104–130.

15.

Das

Mukherjee

Sen

(2009) Biosurfactant of marine origin exhibiting heavy metal remediation properties. Bioresource Technology 100: 4887–4890.

16.

Dave

Gong

Robertson

, et al. (2016) Chemistry and structure of graphene oxide via direct imaging. ACS Nano 10: 7515–7522.

17.

Duru

Ege

Kamali

(2016) Graphene oxides for removal of heavy and precious metals from wastewater. Journal of Materials Science 51: 6097–6116.

18.

Fernandez-Luqueno

Lopez-Valdez

Gamero-Melo

, et al. (2013) Heavy metal pollution in drinking water-a global risk for human health: A review. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 7: 567–584.

19.

Zhang

(2019) Chemical aging and impacts on hydrophilic and hydrophobic polyether sulfone (PES) membrane filtration performances. Polymer Degradation and Stability 168: 108960.

20.

Ganesh

Isloor

Ismail

(2013) Enhanced hydrophilicity and salt rejection study of graphene oxide-polysulfone mixed matrix membrane. Desalination 313: 199–207.

21.

Gao

Liu

Tai

, et al. (2013) Multifunctional graphene oxide–TiO₂ microsphere hierarchical membrane for clean water production. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 138: 17–25.

22.

Giwa

Hasan

(2020) Novel polyethersulfone-functionalized graphene oxide (PES-fGO) mixed matrix membranes for wastewater treatment. Separation and Purification Technology 241: 116735.

23.

Goyat

Saharan

Singh

, et al. (2022a) Synthesis of graphene-based nanocomposites for environmental remediation applications: A review. Molecules 27: 6433.

24.

Goyat

Singh

Umar

, et al. (2022b) Modified low-temperature synthesis of graphene oxide nanosheets: Enhanced adsorption, antibacterial and antioxidant properties. Environmental Research 215: 114245.

25.

(2013) Enabling graphene oxide nanosheets as water separation membranes. Environmental Science & Technology 47: 3715–3723.

26.

Huang

Zhang

, et al. (2015) Graphene-based membranes for molecular separation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 6: 2806–2815.

27.

Huang

Lim

Chia

, et al. (2011) Simple room-temperature preparation of high-yield large-area graphene oxide. International Journal of Nanomedicine 6: 3443–3448.

28.

Hussain

Amu-Darko

JNO

Wang

, et al. (2023) CuO-decorated MOF derived ZnO polyhedral nanostructures for exceptional H₂S gas detection. Chemosphere 317: 137827.

29.

Ibrahim

Wadi

Ouda

, et al. (2022) Highly selective heavy metal ions membranes combining sulfonated polyethersulfone and self-assembled manganese oxide nanosheets on positively functionalized graphene oxide nanosheets. Chemical Engineering Journal 428: 131267.

30.

Jin

Zhang

, et al. (2013) High-performance ultrafiltration membranes based on polyethersulfone–graphene oxide composites. RSC Advances 3: 21394–21397.

31.

Jin

Zhou

(2022) Preparation of iron oxide adsorbent modified by chitosan biomaterials and its adoption in the adsorption of heavy metals. Science of Advanced Materials 14: 1716–1725.

32.

Jin

(2022) Adsorption of Cu²⁺ and Pb²⁺ from municipal wastewater by intercalation polymerization modified kaolin. Science of Advanced Materials 14: 1589–1598.

33.

Junaidi

NFD

Khalil

Jahari

, et al. (2018, May). Effect of graphene oxide (GO) on the surface morphology and hydrophilicity of polyethersulfone (PES). In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Bristol, UK: IOP Publishing, Vol. 358, p. 012047.

34.

Junaidi

NFD

Othman

Shahruddin

, et al. (2019) Effect of graphene oxide (GO) and polyvinylpyrollidone (PVP) additives on the hydrophilicity of composite polyethersulfone (PES) membrane. Malaysian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences 15: 361–366.

35.

Kamalam

Menaka

Inbanathan

SSR

, et al. (2023) Tin oxide-graphene oxide (SnO2/GO) nanocomposite: A promising photocatalyst for rhodamine-B dye degradation. Science of Advanced Materials 15: 648–654.

36.

Karki

Ingole

(2022) Development of polymer-based new high performance thin-film nanocomposite nanofiltration membranes by vapor phase interfacial polymerization for the removal of heavy metal ions. Chemical Engineering Journal 446: 137303.

37.

Khan

Marwani

, et al. (2016) Anti-bacterial PES-cellulose composite spheres: Dual character toward extraction and catalytic reduction of nitrophenol. RSC Advances 6: 110077–110090.

38.

Khan

Ullah

, et al. (2021) Graphene oxide/PVC composite papers functionalized with p-Phenylenediamine as high-performance sorbent for the removal of heavy metal ions. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 9: 105916.

39.

Kim

Choi

Kim

, et al. (2016) Enhanced water permeation based on nanoporous multilayer graphene membranes: The role of pore size and density. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 4: 17773–17781.

40.

Klaysom

Ladewig

, et al. (2011) Preparation and characterization of sulfonated polyethersulfone for cation-exchange membranes. Journal of Membrane Science 368: 48–53.

41.

Koulivand

Shahbazi

Vatanpour

, et al. (2020) Development of carbon dot-modified polyethersulfone membranes for enhancement of nanofiltration, permeation and antifouling performance. Separation and Purification Technology 230: 115895.

42.

Lalia

Kochkodan

Hashaikeh

, et al. (2013) A review on membrane fabrication: Structure, properties and performance relationship. Desalination 326: 77–95.

43.

Lee

Elam

Darling

(2016) Membrane materials for water purification: Design, development, and application. Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology 2: 17–42.

44.

Lim

Choi

Kim

, et al. (2017) Cross-linked graphene oxide membrane having high ion selectivity and antibacterial activity prepared using tannic acid-functionalized graphene oxide and polyethyleneimine. Journal of Membrane Science 521: 1–9.

45.

Liu

Chen

Liu

, et al. (2022) Progress in preparation, characterization, surface functional modification of graphene oxide: A review. Journal of Saudi Chemical Society 26: 101560.

46.

Liu

Feng

, et al. (2020) Novel interlayer on the separator with the Cr₃C₂ compound as a robust polysulfide anchor for lithium–sulfur batteries. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 59: 7538–7545.

47.

Matindi

Kuvarega

, et al. (2020) Exploring the novel PES/malachite mixed matrix membrane to remove organic matter for water purification. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 160: 63–73.

48.

Marcano

Kosynkin

Berlin

, et al. (2010) Improved synthesis of graphene oxide. ACS Nano 4: 4806–4814.

49.

Marjani

Nakhjiri

Adimi

, et al. (2020) Effect of graphene oxide on modifying polyethersulfone membrane performance and its application in wastewater treatment. Scientific Reports 10: 2049.

50.

Meng

, et al. (2022) Determination of metal ions in pinellia ternata by high performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detector. Journal of Nanoelectronics and Optoelectronics 17: 22–29.

51.

Moradi

Zinadini

Rajabi

(2020) Development of the tetrathioterephthalate filler incorporated PES nanofiltration membrane with efficient heavy metal ions rejection and superior antifouling properties. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 8: 104431.

52.

Mukherjee

Singh

(2021) An overview on heavy metal contamination of water system and sustainable approach for remediation. In: Singh

Agrawal

(eds) Water Pollution and Management Practices. Singapore: Springer. pp. 255–277.

53.

Naddeo

Zarra

Pervez

, et al. (2023). A comparative analysis of ecological status assessment in river water quality under the European Water Framework Directive. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering 8: 100477.

54.

Punia

Bharti

Dhar

, et al. (2022) Recent advances in detection and removal of heavy metals from contaminated water. ChemBioEng Reviews 9: 351–369.

55.

Purkait

Sinha

Mondal

, et al. (2018). Introduction to membranes. In Interface Science and Technology. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, Vol. 25, pp. 1–37.

56.

Ren

Chen

Yang

, et al. (2023) Synthesis of metal–organic frameworks for the adsorption of congo red from wastewater. Science of Advanced Materials 15: 1159–1165.

57.

Shen

Sun

, et al. (2023) Progress of anaerobic membrane bioreactor in municipal wastewater treatment. Science of Advanced Materials 15: 1277–1298.

58.

Tsangas

Papamichael

Banti

, et al. (2023) LCA of municipal wastewater treatment. Chemosphere 341: 139952.

59.

Wang

, et al. (2022) Environmental impact of construction waste mixture containing heavy metals pollutants cadmium (Cd) and arsenic (As) used in highway engineering. Science of Advanced Materials 14: 1159–1165.

60.

Wei

Zhang

Gao

, et al. (2018) Multilayered graphene oxide membranes for water treatment: A review. Carbon 139: 964–981.

61.

Yadav

Lochab

(2019) A comparative study of graphene oxide: Hummers, intermediate and improved method. FlatChem 13: 40–49.

62.

Yadav

Saleem

Ibrar

, et al. (2020) Recent developments in forward osmosis membranes using carbon-based nanomaterials. Desalination 482: 114375.

63.

Yang

Zhu

Nie

, et al. (2022) Treatment of heavy-metal-containing oily wastewater using a novel α-zirconium-phosphate/polyacrylonitrile ultrafiltration membrane. Science of Advanced Materials 14: 644–654.

64.

Zhang

Chung

T-S

(2017) Graphene oxide membranes for nanofiltration. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering 16: 9–15.

65.

Zorpas

Pedreño

Candel

MBA

(2021) Heavy metal treatment and removal using natural zeolites from sewage sludge, compost, and agricultural soils: A review. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 14: 1098.

Enhanced removal of iron (Fe) and manganese (Mn) ions from contaminated water using graphene oxide-decorated polyethersulphone membranes: Synthesis and characterization

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Experimental details

Materials

Synthesis of GO

Preparation of PES/GO nanocomposite membranes

Characterization of GO and embedded membrane

Heavy metal ion uptake via filtration setup

Heavy metal uptake study

Results and discussion

Characterization of GO and its embedded membrane

Spectroscopic and morphological characterizations of GO

Morphological and compositional characterizations of GO-PES membrane

Hydrophilicity and porosity analysis

Uptake of HMIs via filtration assembly using GO-PES membrane

Mechanism underlying HMI adsorption

Conclusions

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

ORCID iD

References