While incentive mechanisms have been proven to motivate residents to separate their waste, empirical research is still needed to determine whether this separation behaviour could be maintained over time. The main objective of this paper is to investigate waste separation management activities in the city of Dongying, China, as a case study to clarify how local community citizens’ waste separation participation and recycling activities change over time cross-sectionally under the influence of an economic incentive mechanism – PS. This study used least square dummy variable analysis to investigate local waste separation behaviour in 98 communities over 22 months. Results showed that community resident waste participation and recycling behaviour tend to grow in the early stages and gradually show saturation without growth in the middle and late stages. This result implies limitations to the incentive mechanism, such that it could only motivate a part of residents to participate in waste separation; for those unaffected by financial incentives, it was suggested that educational or compulsory means be used to make them separate their waste.
AhsanTZamanAU (2014) Household waste management in high-rise residential building in Dhaka, Bangladesh: Users’ perspective. International Journal Waste Resources4(1): 1–7.
2.
ChenFChenHLiuS, et al. (2020) Formation and recurrence mechanism of residents’ waste separation behavior under the intervention of information interaction. Resources, Conservation and Recycling162: 105027.
3.
ChenY (2020) Study on domestic waste management in Hangzhou, China. In: Proceedings of the 31st research and presentation meeting of the japan society of material and waste management, p. 87. Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management. (In Japanese). DOI: 10.14912/jsmcwm.31.0_87.
4.
ChenY (2020) System of waste separation: Status and challenges in China. [Doctoral dissertation, Centria University of Applied Sciences]. https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:amk-2020061819125
FeiFQuLWenZ, et al. (2016) How to integrate the informal recycling system into municipal solid waste management in developing countries: Based on a China’s case in Suzhou urban area. Resources, Conservation and Recycling110: 74–86.
7.
GneezyUMeierSRey-BielP (2011) When and why incentives (don’t) work to modify behavior. Journal of Economic Perspectives25: 191–210.
8.
GuoSDingGZhaoQ, et al. (2017) Bonus point system for refuse classification and sustainable development: A study in China. Sustainability9: 1776.
9.
HarderMKWoodardR (2007) Systematic studies of shop and leisure voucher incentives for household recycling. Resources, Conservation and Recycling51: 732–753.
10.
HarderMKWoodardRBenchML (2006) Two measured parameters correlated to participation rates in curbside recycling schemes in the UK. Environmental Management37: 487–495.
11.
LehmanPKGellerES (2004) Behavior analysis and environmental protection: Accomplishments and potential for more. Behavior and Social Issues13: 13–33.
12.
LiX.BiFHanZ, et al. (2019) Garbage source classification performance, impact factor, and management strategy in rural areas of China: A case study in Hangzhou. Waste Management89: 313–321.
13.
LiuTWuYTianX, et al. (2015) Urban household solid waste generation and collection in Beijing, China. Resources, Conservation and REecycling104: 31–37.
14.
OlsonM (1965) The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Revised ed.). Harvard University Press.
15.
ThøgersenJ (2005) How may consumer policy empower consumers for sustainable lifestyles?Journal of Consumer Policy28: 143–177.
16.
VarottoASpagnolliA (2017) Psychological strategies to promote household recycling. A systematic review with meta-analysis of validated field interventions. Journal of Environmental Psychology51: 168-188.
17.
WangFSRichardsonAJRoddickFA (1997) Relationships between set-out rate, participation rate and set-out quantity in recycling programs. Resources, Conservation and Recycling20: 1–17.
18.
WoodardRHarderMKBenchM (2006) Participation in curbside recycling schemes and its variation with material types. Waste Management26: 914–919.
19.
XiaoSDongHGengY, et al. (2018) An overview of China’s recyclable waste recycling and recommendations for integrated solutions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling134: 112–120.
20.
XiaoSDongHGengY, et al. (2020) Policy impacts on Municipal Solid Waste management in Shanghai: A system dynamics model analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production262: 121366.
21.
XuLLingMWuY (2018) Economic incentive and social influence to overcome household waste separation dilemma: A field intervention study. Waste Management77: 522–531.
22.
XuWZhouCLanY, et al. (2015) An incentive-based source separation model for sustainable municipal solid waste management in China. Waste Management & Research33: 469–476.
23.
XueYWenZBressersH, et al. (2019) Can intelligent collection integrate informal sector for urban resource recycling in China. Journal of Cleaner Production208: 307–315.
YauY (2010) Domestic waste recycling, collective action and economic incentive: The case in Hong Kong. Waste Management30: 2440–2447.
26.
ZhangFLiH (2010) Comparative study on recycling modes for recycling industry. Recyclable Resources and Circular Economy3: 27–29.
27.
ZhouMHShenSLXuYS, et al. (2019) New policy and implementation of municipal solid waste classification in Shanghai, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health16: 3099.
28.
ZhuYZhangYLuoD, et al. (2021) A review of municipal solid waste in China: Characteristics, compositions, influential factors and treatment technologies. Environment, Development and Sustainability23: 6603–6622.
29.
ZhuangYWuSWWangYL, et al. (2008) Source separation of household waste: A case study in China. Waste Management28: 2022–2030.
