The management of solid waste is one of the biggest challenges for sustainability. Aiming at gains of scale, guaranteeing universal access and the technical and economic viability of the services, intermunicipal cooperation has been implemented in several countries, and in Brazil, it presents itself as one of the main instruments of public policies in the sector of sanitation. The main objective of this article is to propose a set of indicators and the construction of an index to evaluate the performance of regionalized management of urban solid waste, applying them to intermunicipal public consortia operating in Brazil. Based on the Delphi methodology, a total of 15 indicators were defined, divided into 5 sustainability dimensions, used for the construction of the Regionalized Urban Solid Waste Management Performance Index (IDGRSU). In Brazil, the performance of regionalized management was classified as Regular for most of the operating consortia analysed. The adequacy of the final disposal in regional sanitary landfills is the common practice among the municipalities, and consequently, the reduction of the areas of dumps represents the main advance in the management. The index developed proved to be an important instrument to support municipalities and consortia for waste management, contributing to the implementation of sustainable strategies and to the development of policies, and its application in other countries is feasible, regardless of the size of the municipalities.
CastroMAOSilvaNMMarchandGAEL (2015) Developing indicators for sustainable management of solid waste in Iranduba, Manacapuru and Novo Airão municipalities, Amazon, Brazil. Engenharia Sanitaria e Ambiental20: 415–426.
FechiniRMoraesLRS (2015) Matriz de indicadores de sustentabilidade de coleta seletiva com utilização do Método Delphi. Revista Eletrônica de Engenharia Civil10: 22–35.
FilhoWBrandliLMooraH, et al. (2016) Benchmarking approaches and methods in the field of urban waste management. Journal of Cleaner Production112: 4377–4386.
7.
FrattaKDSAToenliJTLTAntonioGC (2019) Diagnosis of the management of solid urban waste of the municipalities of ABC Paulista of Brasil through the application of sustainability indicators. Waste Management85: 11–17.
8.
GuerreroEErbitiC (2004) Sustainability indicators for the management of household waste, Tandil, Argentina. Revista de Geografía Norte Grande: 71–86.
9.
GuerreroLAMaasGHoglandW (2013) Solid waste management challengs for cities in developing countries. Waste Management33: 220–232.
HülstJRvan MontfortAJGM (2011) Institutional features of inter-municipal cooperation: Cooperative arrangements and their national contexts. Public Policy and Administration27: 121–144.
12.
KojimaM (2019) Regionalization of solid waste management in Asia: Benefits and challenges. In: Toward Regional Cooperation of Local Governments in ASEAN, ERIA Collaborative/Support Research Report, IDE-JETRO.
13.
KołsutB (2016) Inter-municipal cooperation in waste management: The case of Poland. Quaestiones Geographicae35: 91–104.
14.
KuhlmanSBouckaertG (2016) Municipal waste management in Norway and the Netherlands – from inhouse provision to inter-municipal cooperation. In: Local Public Sector Reforms in Times of Crisis: National Trajectories and International Comparisons. 205–220. London: Palgrave Macmillan .Available at: https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/2066/170776/1/170776pos.pdf (accessed December 2020).
15.
MacedoLARLangeLC (2021) Regionalization of integrated urban solid waste management: A performance analysis in operating consortia and their municipalities in Brazil and Argentina. Thesis presented to the Graduate Program in Sanitation, Environment and Water Resources at the Federal University of Minas Gerais, p. 345.
16.
MassaruttoA (2010) Municipal waste management in Italy. Municipal Waste Management in Europe 10: 121–169.
OkudaIThompsonVE (2007) Regionalization of municipal solid waste management in Japan: Balancing the proximity principle with economic efficiency. Environmental Management40: 12–19.
19.
Olay-RomeroETurcott-CervantesHernández-BerrielMDC, et al. (2020) Technical indicators to improve municipal solid waste management in developing countries: A case in Mexico. Waste Management107: 201–210.
20.
PolazCMNTeixeiraBAN (2009) Sustainability indicators for municipal solid urban waste management: a study for São Carlos (SP). Engenharia Sanitaria e Ambiental14: 411–420.
21.
PõldnurkJ (2015) Optimisation of the economic, environmental and administrative efficiency of the municipal waste management model in rural areas. Resources, Conservation and Recycling97: 55–65.
22.
RibeiroJCJHellerL (2004) Environmental indicators for developing countries. Biblioteca virtual de desarrollo sostenible y salud ambiental. Available at: http://www.bvsde.paho.org/bvsAIDIS/PuertoRico29/junque.pdf (accessed November 2019).
23.
SantiagoLSDiasSMF (2012) Matrix of sustainability indicators for urban solid waste management. Engenharia Sanitaria e Ambiental17: 203–212.
24.
Santibañez-AguilarJEFlores-TlacuahuacARivera-ToledoM, et al. (2017) Dynamic optimization for the planning of a waste management system involving multiple cities techniques. Journal of Cleaner Production165: 190–203.
25.
SarraAMazzocchittiMRapposelliA (2017) Evaluating joint environmental and cost performance in municipalwaste management systems through data envelopment analysis: Scale effects and policy implications. Ecological Indicators73: 756–771.
SilvaVMS (2015) Public consortia in urban solid waste management in Brazil. Dissertation presented to the Graduate Program in Economics of the Department of Economics at the University of Brasília, p. 136.
28.
SørensenR (2007) Does dispersed public ownership impair efficiency? The case of refuse collection in Norway. Public Administration85: 1045–1058.
29.
StrukMBakosE (2021) Long-term benefits of intermunicipal cooperation for small municipalities in waste management provision. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Healt18: 1449.
30.
SuzukiJANGomesJ (2009) Inter-municipal consortia for the disposal of MSW in regional landfills: prospective study for municipalities in the State of Paraná. Engenharia Sanitaria e Ambiental14: 155–158.
31.
TelloPMartinezEDazaD, et al. (2011) Regional evaluation on urban solid waste management in Latin America and the Caribbean – 2010 report. Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), InterAmerican Association of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering (AIDIS) and Inter-American Development Bank (IDB).
32.
Turcott CervantesDE (2018) System of indicators for the comprehensive evaluation and control of municipal waste management. PhD Thesis. University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain, p. 414. Available at: https://repositorio.unican.es/xmlui/handle/10902/1541 (accessed May 2020).
33.
Turcott CervantesDEMartínezALHernándezMC, et al. (2018) Using indicators as a tool to evaluate municipal solid waste management: A critical review. Waste Management80: 51–63.
34.
United Nations (UN) (2018) Perspective of waste management in Latin America and the Caribbean. Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente, Oficina para América Latina y el Caribe. Ciudad de Panamá, Panamá, p. 260.
35.
WestK (2007) Inter-municipal cooperation in France: Incentives, instrumentality and empty shells. In: HulstRVan MontfortA (eds) Inter-municipal cooperation in Europe. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 67–90.
36.
World Bank (2018) What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050, Washington, DC: World Bank. 272.
37.
ZamanAU (2014) Identification of key assessment indicators of the zero waste management systems. Ecological Indicators36: 682–693.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
