Co-landfilling of bottom ash (BA) accelerates the clogging of leachate collection systems (LCSs) and increases the risk of landfill failure. The clogging was mainly associated with bio-clogging, which may be reduced by quorum quenching (QQ) strategies. This communication reports on a study of how isolated facultative QQ bacterial strains from municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills and BA co-disposal landfills. In MSW landfills, two novel QQ strains (Brevibacillus agri and Lysinibacillus sp. YS11) can degrade the signal molecule hexanoyl-l-homoserine lactone (C6–HSL) and octanoyl-l-homoserine lactone (C8–HSL), respectively. Pseudomonas aeruginosa could degrade C6–HSL and C8–HSL in BA co-disposal landfills. Moreover, P. aeruginosa (0.98) was observed with a higher growth rate (OD600) compared to that of B. agri (0.27) and Lysinibacillus sp. YS11 (0.53). These results indicated that the QQ bacterial strains were associated with leachate characteristics and signal molecules and could be used for controlling bio-clogging in landfills.
ChanKGYinWFSamCK, et al. (2009) A novel medium for the isolation of N-acylhomoserine lactone-degrading bacteria. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology36: 247–251.
2.
ChenHLiACuiC, et al. (2019) AHL-mediated quorum sensing regulates the variations of microbial community and sludge properties of aerobic granular sludge under low organic loading. Environment International130: 104946.
3.
CheongWSLeeCHMoonYH, et al. (2013) Isolation and identification of indigenous quorum quenching bacteria, Pseudomonas sp. 1A1, for biofouling control in MBR. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research52: 10554–10560.
4.
DouXRenFNguyenMQ, et al. (2017) Review of MSWI bottom ash utilization from perspectives of collective characterization, treatment and existing application. Renewable & Sustainable Energ Reviews79: 24–38.
5.
FengSJChenZWZhengQT (2020) Effect of LCRS clogging on leachate recirculation and landfill slope stability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research27: 6649–6658.
6.
FitrianiAAyuningtyasDPKusnadi (2016) Inhibition of quorum sensing in Chromobacterium violaceum CV026 by Violacein produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences4(1): 103–108.
7.
HePJPuHXShaoLM, et al. (2017) Impact of co-landfill proportion of bottom ash and municipal solid waste composition on the leachate characteristics during the acidogenesis phase. Waste Management69: 232–241.
8.
HuangJGuYZengG, et al. (2019) Control of indigenous quorum quenching bacteria on membrane biofouling in a short-period MBR. Bioresoure Technology283: 261–269.
9.
KhoiriSDamayantiTAGiyantoG (2017) Identification of quorum quenching bacteria and its biocontrol potential against soft rot disease bacteria, Dickeya dadantii. AGRIVITA. Journal of Agricultural Science39: 45–55.
10.
KoJHWangQYuanT, et al. (2019) Geotextile clogging at different stages of municipal solid waste landfills co-disposed with bottom ash. Science of the Total Environment687: 161–167.
11.
LeeKYuHZhangX, et al. (2018) Quorum sensing and quenching in membrane bioreactors: Opportunities and challenges for biofouling control. Bioresoure Technology270: 656–668.
12.
LiLTangYAbichouT, et al. (2019) Characterization of leachates from landfills containing MSW-I residues. Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste23: 04019013.
13.
Ministry of Environment Protection of the People’s Republic of China (2008) Standard for pollution control on the landfill site of municipal solid waste (GB16889-2008). Beijing, China.
14.
MoodyCMTownsendTG (2017) A comparison of landfill leachates based on waste composition. Waste Management63: 267–274.
15.
National Bureau of Statistics of China (2021) China Statistical Yearbook 2021. Beijing: China Statistics Press.
16.
NooriAKimHKimMH, et al. (2022) Quorum quenching bacteria isolated from industrial wastewater sludge to control membrane biofouling. Bioresoure Technology352: 127077.
17.
OhHSYeonKMYangCS, et al. (2012) Control of membrane biofouling in MBR for wastewater treatment by quorum quenching bacteria encapsulated in microporous membrane. Environmental Science & Technology46: 4877–4884.
18.
ShahSSAChooKH (2020) Isolation and characterization of novel indigenous facultative quorum quenching bacterial strains for ambidextrous biofouling control. Bioresoure Technology308: 123269.
19.
SolerAArreguiLArroyoM, et al. (2018) Quorum sensing versus quenching bacterial isolates obtained from MBR plants treating leachates from municipal solid waste. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health15: 1019.
20.
SongXNChengYYLiWW, et al. (2014) Quorum quenching is responsible for the underestimated quorum sensing effects in biological wastewater treatment reactors. Bioresoure Technology171: 472–476.
21.
TangQGuFZhangY, et al. (2018) Impact of biological clogging on the barrier performance of landfill liners. Journal of Environment Management222: 44–53.
22.
WaheedHMehmoodCTLiY, et al. (2022) Genetic insights unraveling quorum quenching potential of indigenous isolates from an anaerobic membrane bioreactor. Science of the Total Environment811: 152349.
23.
WangQKoJHXuQ (2021a) Comparison of bio-clogging characteristics of geotextiles in MSW and bottom ash co-disposal landfills. Waste Management120: 459–466.
24.
WangQZhangTWuG, et al. (2021b) Deciphering acyl-homoserine lactones-mediated quorum sensing on geotextile bio-clogging in municipal solid waste and bottom ash co-disposal landfills. Waste Management124: 136–143.
25.
WuHWangQKoJH, et al. (2018) Characteristics of geotextile clogging in MSW landfills co-disposed with MSWI bottom ash. Waste Management78: 164–172.
26.
XiaoYWaheedHXiaoK, et al. (2018) In tandem effects of activated carbon and quorum quenching on fouling control and simultaneous removal of pharmaceutical compounds in membrane bioreactors. Chemical Engineering Journal341: 610–617.
27.
XuBAlbert NgTHuangS, et al. (2020) Feasibility of isolated novel facultative quorum quenching consortiums for fouling control in an AnMBR. Water Research169: 115251.
28.
Yavuztürk GülBKoyuncuI (2017) Assessment of new environmental quorum quenching bacteria as a solution for membrane biofouling. Process Biochemistry61: 137–146.
29.
YinKAhamedALisakG (2018) Environmental perspectives of recycling various combustion ashes in cement production – A review. Waste Management78: 401–416.
