The aim of this study is to conduct an environmental comparison, by applying the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, of two different compositions for animal foods each with two different nutritional contents (‘high’ for the lactation period, and ‘low’ for the rest of the year). Thus, for each nutritional content, the environmental performance of producing animal feed with a traditional composition mainly based on cereals is compared with a composition based on a mixture of biomass obtained from rice straw and citrus pruning waste. It was observed that the reprocessing of rice straw and citrus pruning waste into animal feed offered environmental potential compared to the current alternative of being burned in the fields. The environmental impact category global warming is especially improved, with impact reductions of up to 50% and 95%, respectively, for high and low nutritional content compositions. In addition, the alternatives proposed herein make it possible to avoid all the inconvenience and impacts on the health of the population living near the fields.
AlhazmiHLoyACM (2021) A review on environmental assessment of conversion of agriculture waste to bio-energy via different thermochemical routes: Current and future trends. Bioresource Technology Reports14: 100682.
4.
AllamMGarasG (2010) Recycled chopped rice straw-cement bricks: An analytical and economical study. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment140: 79–86.
5.
AmaranteEBSchulzRKRomeroOR, et al. (2018) Life cycle assessment of the valorization of rice straw for energy purposes. Rice production in Cuba. Journal of Agriculture and Environment for International Development112: 297–320.
6.
AndreaeMOMerletP (2001) Emission of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning. Global Biogeochemical Cycles15: 955–966.
7.
BakshiMPSWadhwaMMakkarHPS (2016) Waste to worth: Vegetable wastes as animal feed. CAB Reviews Perspectives in Agriculture Veterinary Science Nutrition and Natural Resources11: 1–26.
8.
BisariaRMadanMVasudevanP (1997) Utilisation of agro-residues as animal feed through bioconversion. Bioresource Technology59: 5–8.
9.
BradyNCWeilRR (2004) The Nature and Properties of Soils. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10.
DedeOHMercanNOzerH, et al. (2021) Thermal insulation characteristics of green wall systems using different growing media. Energy and Buildings240: 11087.
11.
DemichelisFLaghezzaMChiapperoM, et al. (2020) Technical, economic and environmental assessement of bioethanol biorefinery from waste biomass. Journal of Cleaner Production277: 124111.
12.
Ecoinvent 3.5 (2018) Ecoinvent Database. Switzerland: Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories.
13.
EspinachFXEspinosaEReixachR, et al. (2020) Study on the macro and micromechanics tensile strength properties of orange tree pruning fiber as sustainable reinforcement on bio-polyethylene compared to oil-derived polymers and its composites. Polymers12: 1–19.
14.
EspinosaEArrebolaRIBascón-VillegasI, et al. (2020) Industrial application of orange tree nanocellulose as papermaking reinforcement agent. Cellulose27: 10781–10797.
15.
European Commission (2020) A new Circular Economy Action Plan for a cleaner and more competitive Europe. European Commission.
16.
FallsMMeysingDLonkarS, et al. (2017) Development of highly digestible animal feed from lignocellulosic biomass Part 1: Oxidative lime pretreatment (OLP) and ball milling of forage sorghum. Translational Animal Science1: 208–214.
17.
FernándezCPérez-BaenaIMartiJV, et al. (2019) Use of orange leaves as a replacement for alfalfa in energy and nitrogen partitioning, methane emissions and milk performance of murciano-granadina goats. Animal Feed Science and Technology247: 103–111.
18.
GarasGBakhoumEAllamM (2015) Rice straw-cementitious bricks: Analytical study on mechanical properties and sustainability measures. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences10: 7959–7968.
19.
GonzálezZRosalARequejoA, et al. (2011) Production of pulp and energy using orange tree prunings. Bioresource Technology102: 9330–9334.
20.
GuineéJB (2002) Handbook on life cycle assessment. Operational guide to the ISO standards. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
21.
HuancaNBeltránMCFernándezC, et al. (2021) Effect of the inclusion of lemon leaves and rice straw by-products in the diet of dairy goats on the quality characteristics of milk and matured cheeses. International Dairy Journal120: 105082.
22.
Im-orbKArpornwichanopA (2020) Process and sustainability analyses of the integrated biomass pyrolysis, gasification, and methanol synthesis process for methanol production. Energy193: 116788.
23.
ISO/TR 14048 (2002) Environmental management-life cycle assessment–data documentation format. European Committee for Standardization (CEN).
24.
ISO 14040 (2006) Environmental Management. Life Cycle Assessment. Principles and Framework, International Standards Organisation.
25.
ISO 14044 (2006) Environmental management–life cycle assessment–requirements and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization (ISO).
26.
JunpenAPansukJKamnoetO, et al. (2018) Emission of air pollutants from rice residue open burning in Thailand, 2018. Atmosphere9: 449.
LaurentABakasIClavreulJ, et al. (2014a). Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems – Part I: Lessons learned and perspectives. Waste Management34: 573–588.
29.
LaurentAClavreulJBernstadA, et al. (2014b) Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems – Part II: Methodological guidance for a better practice. Waste Management34: 589–606.
Migo-SumagangMVPMaguyon-DetrasMCGummertM, et al. (2020). Rice-straw-based heat generation system compared to open-field burning and soil incorporation of rice straw: An assessment of energy, GHG emissions, and economic impacts. Sustain12: 1–18.
35.
Ortiz De ZárateIEzcurraALacauxJP, et al. (2000) Emission factor estimates of cereal waste burning in Spain. Atmospheric Environment34: 3183–3193.
36.
Pérez-NeiraDRodríguez-FernándezMP, et al. (2020) The greenhouse gas mitigation potential of university commuting: A case study of the University of León (Spain). Journal of Transport Geography82: 102550.
37.
QuispeINaviaRKahhatR (2019) Life cycle assessment of rice husk as an energy source. A Peruvian case study. Journal of Cleaner Production209: 1235–1244.
38.
ReixachRDel ReyRAlbaJ, et al. (2015) Acoustic properties of agroforestry waste orange pruning fibers reinforced polypropylene composites as an alternative to laminated gypsum boards. Construction and Building Materials77: 124–129.
39.
RicciardiPCillariGCarnevale MiinoM, et al. (2020) Valorization of agro-industry residues in the building and environmental sector: A review. Waste Management & Research38: 487–513.
40.
SaganiAHagidimitriouMDedoussisV (2019) Perennial tree pruning biomass waste exploitation for electricity generation: The perspective of Greece. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments31: 77–85.
41.
SahaiSSharmaCSinghDP, et al. (2007) A study for development of emission factors for trace gases and carbonaceous particulate species from in situ burning of wheat straw in agricultural fields in india. Atmospheric Environment41: 9173–9186.
42.
SanchisE (2014) Emisiones de gases en el cultivo del arroz: efecto de la gestión de la paja. Spain: Universitat Politècnica de València.
43.
SatlewalAAgrawalRBhagiaS, et al. (2018) Rice straw as a feedstock for biofuels: Availability, recalcitrance, and chemical properties. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining12: 83–107.
44.
ShafieSMMasjukiHHMahliaTMI (2014) Life cycle assessment of rice straw-based power generation in Malaysia. Energy70: 401–410.
45.
ShangXSongSYangJ (2020) Comparative environmental evaluation of straw resources by LCA in China. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering2020: 4781805.
46.
SharmaASinghGAryaSK (2020). Biofuel from rice straw. Journal of Cleaner Production277: 124101.
47.
SimaPro v 8.3 (2018) PRé Sustainability B.V. Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
48.
SinghABasakP (2019) Economic and environmental evaluation of rice straw processing technologies for energy generation: A case study of Punjab, India. Journal of Cleaner Production212: 343–352.
49.
SoamSBorjessonPSharmaPK, et al. (2017) Life cycle assessment of rice straw utilization practices in India. Bioresource Technology228: 89–98.
50.
SreekumarAShastriYWadekarP, et al. (2020) Life cycle assessment of ethanol production in a rice-straw-based biorefinery in India. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy22: 409–422.
51.
UgwuanyiJO (2008) Yield and protein quality of thermophilic Bacillus spp. biomass related to thermophilic aerobic digestion of agricultural wastes for animal feed supplementation. Bioresource Technology99: 3279–3290.
52.
UsmaniZSharmaMAwasthiAK, et al. (2021) Bioprocessing of waste biomass for sustainable product development and minimizing environmental impact. Bioresource Technology322: 124548.
53.
UsubharatanaPPhungrassamiH (2019) Life cycle assessment of bio-based thermal insulation materials formed by different methods. Environmental Engineering & Management Journal18: 1471–1486.
54.
VadrevuKPLaskoKGiglioL, et al. (2019) Trends in vegetation fires in South and Southeast Asian countries. Scientific Reports9: 1–13.
55.
VamvukaDTrikouvertisMPentariD, et al. (2014) Evaluation of ashes produced from fl uidized bed combustion of residues from oranges’ plantations and processing. Renewable Energy72: 336–343.
56.
Velázquez-MartíBFernández-GonzálezELópez-CortésI, et al. (2013) Prediction and evaluation of biomass obtained from citrus trees pruning. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment11: 1485–1491.
57.
WangLSetoguchiAOishiK, et al. (2019) Life cycle assessment of 36 dairy farms with by-product feeding in Southwestern China. Science of the Total Environment696: 133985.
58.
YodkhumSSampattagulSGheewalaSH (2018) Energy and environmental impact analysis of rice cultivation and straw management in northern Thailand. Environmental Science and Pollution Research25: 17654–17664.
59.
ZhangJSmithKRMaY, et al. (2000) Greenhouse gases and other airborne pollutants from household stoves in China: A database for emission factors. Atmospheric Environment34: 4537–4549.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
