Application of a ‘Recycling Exchange’ instrument to compensate waste pickers in Brazil via a first payment for urban environmental services programme

Abstract

This article presents an approach to compensate waste pickers in the informal sector of Minas Gerais state, Brazil, via a Payment for Urban Environmental Services (PUES) instrument, called ‘Recycling Exchange’. The aim is to evaluate the effects of this instrument on the amount of waste diverted from landfill and reintroduced into the production chain, and to increase recognition of waste pickers’ contributions to the state’s economy. It was found that the ‘Recycling Exchange’ met the fundamental objectives of a PUES: the double social and economic benefits of the social inclusion of waste pickers in the execution of the public policy for solid waste management, and inducing (in the case of glass), ensuring and stabilising (plastic and paper) continuity of the activity of selling recyclables in times of wide price fluctuations for these recyclables. The instrument enhanced the provision of this environmental service and the positive externalities associated with recycling.

Keywords

Economics instruments solid wastes payment for urban environmental services (PUES)recycling waste pickers informal sector ‘Recycling Exchange’

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brazilian Aluminum Association (ABAL) (2018) Sector yearbook. Available at: http://abal.org.br/publicacao/anuario-estatistico-abal-2018/ (accessed 28 April 2020).

Brazilian Association Of Public Cleaning Companies And Special Waste. Panorama of Solid Waste in Brazil – 2019. ABRELPE: 2020. Rio de Janeiro. 120p Available at: http://www.abrelpe.org.br/Panorama/panorama2014.pdf. (accessed 05 January 2021).

Brazilian Association of the Plastics Industry (ABIPLAST) (2019) Mapping of the plastic recycling industry in Brazil. Available at: http://www.abiplast.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Preview_abiplast_2019.pdf (accessed 15 April 2020).

Brazil (2020) Ministry of environment, secretariat of environmental quality. National Solid Waste Plan, Brasilia, p.187. Available at: http://consultaspublicas.mma.gov.br/planares/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Plano-Nacional-de-Res%C3%ADduos-S%C3%B3lidos-Consulta-P%C3%BAblica.pdf (accessed 08 October 2020).

BRAZILIAN ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC CLEANING COMPANIES AND SPECIAL WASTE (2020) Panorama of solid waste in Brazil – 2019. ABRELPE: 2020. Rio de Janeiro, p.120. Available at: http://www.abrelpe.org.br/Panorama/panorama2014.pdf (accessed 05 January 2021).

Engel

Pagiola

Wunder

(2008) Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues. Ecological Economics 65: 663–674.

Guo

Zhong

Zhang

(2013) Privacy-preserving Kruskal–Wallis test. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 112: 135–145. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169260713001806 (accessed 6 June 2021).

Kruskal

Wallis

(1952) Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association 47: 583–621.

Magrini

D’Addato

Bonoli

(2020) Municipal solid waste prevention: A review of market-based instruments in six European Union countries. Waste Management & Research 38: 3–22.

10.

Massoud

El-Fadel

Malak

(2003) Assessment of public vs private MSW management: A case study. Journal of Environmental Management 69: 15–24.

11.

Mota

(Coord.), Milannez

Luedemann

, et al. (2010) Research report: Research on payment for urban environmental services for solid waste management. Institute for Applied Economic Research (IPEA), Brasilia, p.62. Available at: https://www.ipea.gov.br/portal/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=8858 (accessed 18 August 2019).

12.

National Sanitation Information System (SNIS) (2017) Diagnosis of urban solid waste management. Ministry of regional development – National Secretariat of Sanitation. Brasília, 2019, p.194. Available at: http://www.snis.gov.br/diagnosticos (accessed February 2020).

13.

National Sanitation Information System (SNIS) (2019) Diagnosis of urban solid waste management. Ministry of regional development - National Sanitation Secretariat. Brasilia, 2020, p.246, Available at: http://www.snis.gov.br/diagnosticos (accessed February 2021).

14.

Oosterveer

(2009) Urban environmental services and the state in East Africa; between neo-developmental and network governance approaches. Geoforum 40: 1061–1068. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0016718509001134 (accessed 23 September 2020).

15.

Revi

Dube

(1999) Indicators for urban environmental services in Lucknow – Process and methods. Environment and Urbanization 11: 227–246.

16.

Ribeiro

JCJ

Reis

(2019) Payment for Urban Environmental Services - PSAU: elaboration and implementation of the recycling grant in Minas Gerais. In: Ribeiro

JCJ

(ed.) Solid Waste Management and Management - An Overview in Minas Gerais. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris, pp.197–216, 2019.

17.

Sayago

Oliveira

JMD

Da Motta

(1998) Solid Waste: Environ-mental Economic Instruments (Modernization of the Sanitation Sector Series), vol. 15, p.148.

18.

Shapiro

Wilk

(1965) An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52: 591–611.

19.

Siegel

Castellan

(1988) Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd edn). New York: McGraw-Hill.

20.

State Foundation for the Environment (FEAM) (2019) Overview of MSW destination Minas Gerais 2019 – base year 2018. Available at: http://www.feam.br/component/content/article/15/2009-relatorios-de-progresso-panoramas-classificacao-por-municipio-e-mapas-de-situacao-da-destinacao-de-rsu (accessed 20 October 2020).