Drift in policy implementation: Incentives thwarted in a recycling programme

Abstract

An incentives-based residential recycling programme was designed and implemented for improving residential waste sorting in Shanghai city, but showed very limited success in its performance. To identify why, this study systematically analysed each step of implementation using key informant interviews and site observations. Results show that policy intentions were retained in the policy devolution processes from Municipality to District, and then to Street (ward) levels, but the incentives concepts were effectively nullified in the further devolution to community-level governance. The local implementers focused on formal key performance indicators (KPIs) in order to satisfy inspections. However, the KPIs, which had been devised to allow ease of measurement, were found to unintentionally cause divergence from the policy intention of incentivisation of residents. Furthermore, high scores for these KPIs masked the implementation failure. This identification of the effective derailing of a policy via conscientious implementation is worth highlighting for avoidance in other programmes, in recycling or elsewhere.

Keywords

Incentives Green Account subsidy waste sorting food waste decision-making waste policy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Babbie

(2010) The Practice of Social Research. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

Dai

Gordon

MPR

, et al. (2015) Why doorstepping can increase household waste recycling. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 102: 9–19.

Dai

Lin

, et al. (2016) Information strategy failure: Personal interaction success, in urban residential food waste segregation. Journal of Cleaner Production 134: 298–309.

Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) (2007) Waste Strategy for England 2007. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/228536/7086.pdf (accessed 20 September 2020).

General Office of the State Council of China (GOSCC) (2017) 国务院办公厅关于转发国家发展改革委住房城乡建设部生活垃圾分类制度实施方案的通知 [Notice of The General Office of the State Council on forwarding the Implementation Plan of the Household Garbage Classification System from the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China and the National Development]. Available at: https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E5%9B%BD%E5%8A%A1%E9%99%A2%E5%8A%9E%E5%85%AC%E5%8E%85%E5%85%B3%E4%BA%8E%E8%BD%AC%E5%8F%91%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%B6%E5%8F%91%E5%B1%95%E6%94%B9%E9%9D%A9%E5%A7%94%E4%BD%8F%E6%88%BF%E5%9F%8E%E4%B9%A1%E5%BB%BA%E8%AE%BE%E9%83%A8%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB%E5%9E%83%E5%9C%BE%E5%88%86%E7%B1%BB%E5%88%B6%E5%BA%A6%E5%AE%9E%E6%96%BD%E6%96%B9%E6%A1%88%E7%9A%84%E9%80%9A%E7%9F%A5/20591895?fr=aladdin (accessed 3 September 2020).

Harder

Woodard

(2007) Systematic studies of shop and leisure voucher incentives for household recycling. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 51: 732–753.

Hornik

Cherian

Madansky

, et al. (1995) Determinants of recycling behavior: A synthesis of research results. Journal of Socio-Economics 24: 105–127.

Huang

Wang

Dai

, et al. (2014) More than financial investment is needed: Food waste recycling pilots in Shanghai, China. Journal of Cleaner Production 67: 107–116.

Huang

Wang

, et al. (2016) 论生活垃圾居民源头分类减量的激励机制——以上海为例 [Incentive mechanism of source separation and reduction of domestic waste: Case study in Shanghai]. Environmental Sanitation Engineering 24: 1–5.

10.

Huang

Tamas

Harder

(2018) Information with a smile – Does it increase recycling? Journal of Cleaner Production 178: 947–953.

11.

Lee

Paik

(2011) Korean household waste management and recycling behavior. Building and Environment 46: 1159–1166.

12.

Wang

, et al. (2021) The incentives may not be the incentive: A field experiment in recycling of residential food waste. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 168: 105316.

13.

Huang

Harder

(2017) Incentives for food waste diversion: Exploration of a long term successful Chinese city residential scheme. Journal of Cleaner Production 156: 491–499.

14.

Lin

Wang

, et al. (2016) Visual prompts or volunteer models: An experiment in recycling. Sustainability (Switzerland) 8: 458.

15.

Maunder

(2006) The use of incentives to change householder behaviour to improved waste management practices in England. In: Proceedings of Conference: Waste 2006: Sustainable Waste And Resource Management, Stratford-upon-Avon, 19–21 September 2006, pp. 459–468.

16.

Miafodzyeva

Brandt

(2013) Recycling behaviour among householders: Synthesising determinants via a meta-analysis. Waste and Biomass Valorisation 4: 221–235.

17.

Qian

(2019) 从激励性到强制性：城市社区垃圾分类的实践模式、逻辑转换与实现路径 [From incentive to mandatory: Practice mode, logical transformation and implementation path of urban community waste classification]. 华东理工大学学报（社会科学版） [Journal of East China University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition)] 34: 83–91.

18.

Rousta

Ordoñez

Bolton

, et al. (2017) Support for designing waste sorting systems: A mini review. Waste Management and Research 35: 1099–1111.

19.

Shanghai Landscaping & City Appearance Administrative Bureau (SLCAAB) (2020) 关于完善绿色账户激励机制的指导意见 [Guidelines of Shanghai Landscaping & City Appearance Administrative Bureau on improving the incentive mechanism of Shanghai green account]. Available at: http://lhsr.sh.gov.cn/srgl/20200402/0039-6732813D-0DD0-49E8-BD37-20F616551379.html (accessed 20 September 2020).

20.

Shekdar

(2009) Sustainable solid waste management: An integrated approach for Asian countries. Waste Management 29: 1438–1448.

21.

Suttibak

Nitivattananon

(2008) Assessment of factors influencing the performance of solid waste recycling programs. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 53: 45–56.

22.

Tai

Zhang

Che

, et al. (2011) Municipal solid waste source-separated collection in China: A comparative analysis. Waste Management 31: 1673–1682.

23.

Tian

(2015) 中国城市生活垃圾管理政策的演变及未来走向 [The evolution and future trend of China’s MSW management policy]. 城市问题 [Urban Problems] 241: 82–89.

24.

Timlett

Williams

(2008) Public participation and recycling performance in England: A comparison of tools for behaviour change. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 52: 622–634.

25.

Varotto

Spagnolli

(2017) Psychological strategies to promote household recycling. A systematic review with meta-analysis of validated field interventions. Journal of Environmental Psychology 51: 168–188.

26.

Vining

Ebreo

(1990) What makes a recycler? A comparison of recyclers and nonrecyclers. Environment and Behavior 22: 55–73.

27.

Wang

Zhang

(2018) 基于”绿色账户”的垃圾分类激励机制优化 [Optimisation of incentive mechanism of garbage classification based on “green account”]. Environmental Economy 5: 54–57.

28.

Zhou

Yan

, et al. (2016) 上海城市垃圾分类减量绿色账户制度的成效与优化建议 [Effects and improvement suggestions of green account system for waste classification and reduction in Shanghai]. Journal of Shanghai University (Natural Science) 22: 197–202.

29.

(2018) “互联网+垃圾分类”模式存在问题与建议——以上海”绿色账户”为例 (Problems and suggestions of “internet + garbage classification” model – A case study of “green account” in Shanghai). Modern Business 21: 181–183.

30.

Lin

Gordon

MPR

, et al. (2016) Perceived key elements of a successful residential food waste sorting program in urban apartments: stakeholder views. Journal of Cleaner Production 134: 362–370.

31.

Zhou

Lan

, et al. (2015) An incentive-based source separation model for sustainable municipal solid waste management in China. Waste Management & Research 33: 469–476.

32.

(2016) 源头分类，激励模式管用吗？ [Source categorisation, does incentive model work?] Environmental Economy Z3: 80–84.

33.

Zhou

Shi

Xiang

, et al. (2014) 基于能量分析的生活垃圾分类收集方式探讨 [The discussion on municipal solid waste classified collection model based on energy analysis]. Environmental Science & Technology 37: 300–303.

34.

Zhu

(2013) 环境政策执行模式研究 [Research on the Implementation Mode of Environmental Policy]. Shanghai: Fudan University.