The citrus industry is considered one of the main contributors to agricultural waste. Peels are commonly used in the food industry or as feedstock in biorefining. In this study, the potential of waste orange peel biochar for agricultural applications in sandy soil was investigated. This will not only increase the percentage of agricultural waste recycling, but also lead to more sustainable agriculture with environmental benefits such as carbon sequestration. Biochar was produced through slow pyrolysis in the temperature range 300–600°C and at two holding durations (10 min and 60 min). Both factors had a significant impact on the physicochemical characteristics of biochar in the heating region 300–450°C. However, varying the holding time for pyrolysis temperatures beyond 450°C had a diminishing effect on biochar properties compared with the impact of increasing pyrolysis temperature. The study also looked at certain properties that are specific to agricultural application not previously reported for orange peel. Very high cation exchange capacities of 70 cmol kg−1 were achieved at 300°C, whereas water holding capacity was not strongly influenced by pyrolysis conditions. Preliminary planting tests indicate potential for improving agricultural sustainability in sandy soils. The technoeconomic analysis of biochar showed that the pyrolysis process can be profitable with sufficient plant capacity.
AbdelaalAHMckayGMackeyHR (2019) Food waste from a university campus in the Middle East: Drivers, composition, and resource recovery potential. Waste Management98: 14–20.
2.
AlhashimiHAAktasCB (2017) Life cycle environmental and economic performance of biochar compared with activated carbon: A meta-analysis. Resources, Conservation and Recycling118: 13–26.
3.
AlNoussAMcKayGAl-AnsariT (2020a) Enhancing waste to hydrogen production through biomass feedstock blending: A techno-economic-environmental evaluation. Applied Energy266: 114885.
4.
AlNoussAMcKayGAl-AnsariT (2020b) Production of syngas via gasification using optimum blends of biomass. Journal of Cleaner Production242: 118499.
5.
AlvarezJHooshdaranBCortazarM, et al. (2018) Valorization of citrus wastes by fast pyrolysis in a conical spouted bed reactor. Fuel224: 111–120.
6.
Al-WabelMIAl-OmranAEl-NaggarAH, et al. (2013) Pyrolysis temperature induced changes in characteristics and chemical composition of biochar produced from conocarpus wastes. Bioresource Technology131: 374–379.
7.
ASTM International (2015) ASTM D7582-15 Standard Test Methods for Proximate Analysis of Coal and Coke by Macro Thermogravimetric Analysis. West Conshohocken: ASTM International.
8.
ASTM International (2018) ASTM D7503-18 Standard Test Method for Measuring the Exchange Complex and Cation Exchange Capacity of Inorganic Fine-Grained Soils. West Conshohocken: ASTM International.
9.
BassoAMiguezFLairdD, et al. (2013) Assessing potential of biochar for increasing water holding capacity of sandy soils. GCB Bioenergy5: 132–143.
10.
BhattacharjeeNBiswasAB (2019) Pyrolysis of orange bagasse: Comparative study and parametric influence on the product yield and their characterization. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering7: 102903.
11.
BiswasBPandeyNBishtY, et al. (2017) Pyrolysis of agricultural biomass residues: Comparative study of corn cob, wheat straw, rice straw and rice husk. Bioresource Technology237: 57–63.
12.
CantrellKBHuntPGUchimiyaM, et al. (2012) Impact of pyrolysis temperature and manure source on physicochemical characteristics of biochar. Bioresource Technology107: 419–428.
13.
ChandraSBhattacharyaJ (2019) Influence of temperature and duration of pyrolysis on the property heterogeneity of rice straw biochar and optimization of pyrolysis conditions for its application in soils. Journal of Cleaner Production215: 1123–1139.
14.
ChenYYangHWangX, et al. (2012) Biomass-based pyrolytic polygeneration system on cotton stalk pyrolysis: Influence of temperature. Bioresource Technology107: 411–418.
15.
CimòGKucerikJBernsAE, et al. (2014) Effect of heating time and temperature on the chemical characteristics of biochar from poultry manure. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry62: 1912–1918.
16.
CrombieKMašekOSohiSP, et al. (2013) The effect of pyrolysis conditions on biochar stability as determined by three methods. GCB Bioenergy5: 122–131.
17.
DasOSarmahAK (2015) The love–hate relationship of pyrolysis biochar and water: A perspective. Science of the Total Environment512–513: 682–685.
18.
DemirbasA (2004) Effects of temperature and particle size on bio-char yield from pyrolysis of agricultural residues. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis72: 243–248.
19.
de Sousa LimaJRde Moraes SilvaWde MedeirosEV, et al. (2018) Effect of biochar on physicochemical properties of a sandy soil and maize growth in a greenhouse experiment. Geoderma319: 14–23.
20.
DingZWanYHuX, et al. (2016) Sorption of lead and methylene blue onto hickory biochars from different pyrolysis temperatures: Importance of physicochemical properties. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry37: 261–267.
21.
FAO (2011) The State of the World’s Land and Water Resources for Food and Agriculture (SOLAW)—Managing Systems at Risk. Rome and Earthscan, London: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
22.
FAO (2017a) Citrus Fruit: Fresh and Processed Statistical Bulletin 2016. Rome, Italy: Trade and Markets Division, FAO, 2017. Available at: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i8092e.pdf (accessed 5 December 2020).
23.
FAO (2017b) The future of food and agriculture: Trends and challenges. Available at: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i6583e.pdf (accessed 5 December 2020).
24.
FerraraFOrsiniAPlaisantA, et al. (2014) Pyrolysis of coal, biomass and their blends: Performance assessment by thermogravimetric analysis. Bioresource Technology171: 433–441.
25.
GarcíaRPizarroCLavínAG, et al. (2013) Biomass proximate analysis using thermogravimetry. Bioresource Technology139: 1–4.
26.
GoberP (2010) Desert urbanization and the challenges of water sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability2: 144–150.
27.
HarsonoSSGrundmanPLauLH, et al. (2013) Energy balances, greenhouse gas emissions and economics of biochar production from palm oil empty fruit bunches. Resources, Conservation and Recycling77: 108–115.
28.
HeHHuYChenS, et al. (2017) Preparation and properties of a hyperbranch-structured polyamine adsorbent for carbon dioxide capture. Scientific Reports7: 1–10.
29.
HuXZhangXHaoH, et al. (2019) Comparison study on the ammonium adsorption of the biochars derived from different kinds of fruit peel. Science of the Total Environment707: 135544.
30.
LamSSLiewRKChengCK, et al. (2018) Pyrolysis production of fruit peel biochar for potential use in treatment of palm oil mill effluent. Journal of Environmental Management213: 400–408.
31.
LamSSLiewRKLimXY, et al. (2016) Fruit waste as feedstock for recovery by pyrolysis technique. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation113: 325–333.
32.
LehmannJGauntJRondonM (2006) Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems—A review. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change11: 403–427.
33.
LiSHarrisSAnandhiA, et al. (2019) Predicting biochar properties and functions based on feedstock and pyrolysis temperature: A review and data syntheses. Journal of Cleaner Production215: 890–902.
LohrasbiMPourbafraniMNiklassonC, et al. (2010) Process design and economic analysis of a citrus waste biorefinery with biofuels and limonene as products. Bioresource Technology101: 7382–7388.
36.
MaZYangYWuY, et al. (2019) In-depth comparison of the physicochemical characteristics of bio-char derived from biomass pseudo components: Hemicellulose, cellulose, and lignin. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis140: 195–204.
37.
MaroušekJRowlandZValáškováK, et al. (2020) Techno-economic assessment of potato waste management in developing economies. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy22: 937–944.
MarshallJMuhlackRMortonBJ, et al. (2019) Pyrolysis temperature effects on biochar–water interactions and application for improved water holding capacity in vineyard soils. Soil Systems3: 27.
40.
MaryGSSugumaranPNivedithaS, et al. (2016) Production, characterization and evaluation of biochar from pod (Pisum sativum), leaf (Brassica oleracea) and peel (Citrus sinensis) wastes. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture5: 43–53.
41.
MirandaRBustos-MartinezDBlancoCS, et al. (2009) Pyrolysis of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) dry peel. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis86: 245–251.
42.
MukherjeeAZimmermanARHarrisW (2011) Surface chemistry variations among a series of laboratory-produced biochars. Geoderma163: 247–255.
43.
NovakJLimaIXingB, et al. (2009) Characterization of designer biochar produced at different temperatures and their effects on a loamy sand. Annals of Environmental Science3: 195–206.
44.
OzturkBWinterburnJGonzalez-MiquelM (2019) Orange peel waste valorisation through limonene extraction using bio-based solvents. Biochemical Engineering Journal151: 107298.
45.
RagabRPrudhommeC (2002) Climate change and water resources management in arid and semi-arid regions: Prospective and challenges for the 21st century. Biosystems Engineering81: 3–34.
46.
RajkovichSEndersAHanleyK, et al. (2012) Corn growth and nitrogen nutrition after additions of biochars with varying properties to a temperate soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils48: 271–284.
47.
RehrahDBansodeRRHassanO, et al. (2016) Physico-chemical characterization of biochars from solid municipal waste for use in soil amendment. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis118: 42–53.
48.
RehrahDReddyMRNovakJM, et al. (2014) Production and characterization of biochars from agricultural by-products for use in soil quality enhancement. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis108: 301–309.
49.
SantosCMDweckJViottoRS, et al. (2015) Application of orange peel waste in the production of solid biofuels and biosorbents. Bioresource Technology196: 469–479.
50.
SchinnerFOhlingerRKandelerE, et al. (1996) Methods in Soil Biology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
51.
SialTALanZKhanMN, et al. (2019) Evaluation of orange peel waste and its biochar on greenhouse gas emissions and soil biochemical properties within a loess soil. Waste Management87: 125–134.
StefaniukMOleszczukP (2015) Characterization of biochars produced from residues from biogas production. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis115: 157–165.
SulimanWHarshJBAbu-LailNI, et al. (2016) Influence of feedstock source and pyrolysis temperature on biochar bulk and surface properties. Biomass and Bioenergy84: 37–48.
56.
TanZYuanSHongM, et al. (2020) Mechanism of negative surface charge formation on biochar and its effect on the fixation of soil Cd. Journal of Hazardous Materials384: 121370.
57.
VolpeRMenendezJMBReinaTR, et al. (2017) Evolution of chars during slow pyrolysis of citrus waste. Fuel Processing Technology158: 255–263.
58.
WangXLiuNLiuY, et al. (2017) Adsorption removal of 17β-estradiol from water by rice straw-derived biochar with special attention to pyrolysis temperature and background chemistry. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health14: 1–17.
59.
WhitfordWWadeEL (2002) Ecology of Desert Systems. London, UK: Academic Press.
60.
YeSZengGWuH, et al. (2019) The effects of activated biochar addition on remediation efficiency of co-composting with contaminated wetland soil. Resources, Conservation and Recycling140: 278–285.
61.
ZhangJChenQYouC (2016) Biochar effect on water evaporation and hydraulic conductivity in sandy soil. Pedosphere26: 265–272.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
