A laboratory scale experiment of digestate composting was carried out using a reactor system. In this study, conventional physicochemical and biological analyses were carried out and fluorescence excitation-emission matrix (EEM) spectroscopy combined with parallel factor analysis (PARAFAC) was used to assess the maturity and stability during digestate composting. A four-component model was obtained and three components, i.e. fulvic-like (C1 and C3), protein-like (C2), and humic-like (C4) components, were identified. Furthermore, the ratios of each two components were calculated and the relationships with other parameters were established using Pearson correlation analysis. The results showed that the main humification process during digestate composting was the accumulation of fulvic-like substances and that secondary formation occurred at the late stage of digestate composting. Moreover, the EEM–PARAFAC technique could be used as a sensitive and efficient tool for assessing the dynamic changes of digestate composting. The ratio C4/(C1 + C3) is the most suitable indicator in evaluating the stability of digestate composting.
AlbrechtRVerrecchiaEPfeiferHR (2015) The use of solid-phase fluorescence spectroscopy in the characterisation of organic matter transformations. Talanta134: 453–459.
2.
AlburquerqueJAde la FuenteCFerrer-CostaAet al. (2012) Assessment of the fertiliser potential of digestates from farm and agroindustrial residues. Biomass and Bioenergy40: 181–189.
3.
ArabGMcCartneyD (2017) Benefits to decomposition rates when using digestate as compost co-feedstock. Part I. Focus on physicochemical parameters. Waste Management68: 74–84.
4.
BakerACurryM (2004) Fluorescence of leachates from three contrasting landfills. Water Research38: 2605–2613.
5.
BernalMPAlburquerqueJAMoralR (2008) Composting of animal manures and chemical criteria for compost maturity assessment. A review. Bioresource Technology100: 5444–5453.
6.
BustamanteMAAlburquerqueJARestrepoAPet al. (2012) Co-composting of the solid fraction of anaerobic digestates, to obtain added-value materials for use in agriculture. Biomass and Bioenergy43: 26–35.
7.
BustamanteMARestrepoAPAlburquerqueJAet al. (2013) Recycling of anaerobic digestates by composting: effect of the bulking agent used. Journal of Cleaner Production47: 61–69.
8.
ChenWWesterhoffPLeenheerJAet al. (2003) Fluorescence excitation-emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter. Environmental Science and Technology37: 5701–5710.
9.
ChenZ-KWangY-TWangF-Bet al. (2014) Excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy and parallel factor analysis for micro-content petroleum pollutant. Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi34: 2561–2567.
10.
ChowdhuryMADe NeergaardAStoumann JensenL (2014) Composting of solids separated from anaerobically digested animal manure: effect of different bulking agents and mixing ratios on emissions of greenhouse gases and ammonia. Biosystem Engineering124: 63–77.
11.
CoblePG (1996) Characterization of marine and terrestrial DOM in seawater using excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy. Marine Chemistry51: 325–346.
12.
De BertoldiMValliniGPeraA (1983) The biology of composting: a review. Waste Management & Research1: 157–176.
13.
EklindYKirchmannH (2000) Composting and storage of organic household waste with different litter amendments. II. Nitrogen turnover and losses. Bioresource Technology74: 125–133.
14.
GeJHuangGHuangJet al. (2016) Particle-scale modeling of methane emission during pig manure/wheat straw aerobic composting. Environmental Science and Technology50: 4374–4383.
15.
GeJHuangGYangZet al. (2014) Characterization of the dynamic thickness of the aerobic layer during pig manure aerobic composting by Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy. Environmental Science and Technology48 : 5043–5050.
16.
HiraiMChamyasakVKubotaH (1983) Standard measurement for compost maturity. BioCycle: Journal of Waste Recycling24: 54–56.
17.
HuangGFWongJWCWuQTet al. (2004) Effect of C/N on composting of pig manure with sawdust. Waste Management24: 805–813.
18.
LiYLuoWLuJet al. (2018) Effects of digestion time in anaerobic digestion on subsequent digestate composting. Bioresource Technology267: 117–125.
19.
LiuNZhouJHanLet al. (2017) Characterization of lignocellulosic compositions’ degradation during chicken manure composting with added biochar by phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) and correlation analysis. Science of the Total Environment586: 1003–1011.
20.
LvBXingMZhaoCet al. (2014) Towards understanding the stabilization process in vermicomposting using PARAFAC analysis of fluorescence spectra. Chemosphere117: 216–222.
21.
MathurSP (1991) Composting processes. In: MartinAM (ed) Bioconversion of Waste Materials to Industrial Products. New York: Elsevier, pp.147–186.
22.
MullerMJimenezJAntoniniMet al. (2014) Combining chemical sequential extractions with 3D fluorescence spectroscopy to characterize sludge organic matter. Waste Management34 : 2572–2580.
MurphyKRHamblyASinghSet al. (2011) Organic matter fluorescence in municipal water recycling schemes: toward a unified PARAFAC model. Environmental Science and Technology45: 2909–2916.
25.
ProvenzanoMRCavalloOMalerbaADet al. (2018) Unravelling (maize silage) digestate features throughout a full-scale plant: a spectroscopic and thermal approach. Journal of Cleaner Production193: 372–378.
26.
ProvenzanoMRIannuzziGFabbriCet al. (2011) Qualitative characterization and differentiation of digestates from different biowastes using FTIR and fluorescence spectroscopies. Journal of Environmental Protection2: 83–89.
27.
ProvenzanoMRMalerbaADPezzollaDet al. (2014) Chemical and spectroscopic characterization of organic matter during the anaerobic digestion and successive composting of pig slurry. Waste Management34: 653–660.
28.
RestrepoAPMedinaEPérez-EspinosaAet al. (2013) Substitution of peat in horticultural seedlings: suitability of digestate-derived compost from cattle manure and maize silage codigestion. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis44: 668–677.
29.
SongZZhangCYangGet al. (2014) Comparison of biogas development from households and medium and large-scale biogas plants in rural China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews33: 204–213.
30.
SørensenPMøllerHB (2009) Fate of nitrogen in pig and cattle slurries applied to the soil-crop system. In: Anaerobic Digestion. Milan: Di.Pro.Ve., pp.27–37.
31.
StedmonCABroR (2008) Characterizing dissolved organic matter fluorescence with parallel factor analysis: a tutorial. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods6: 572–579.
32.
TamboneFGeneviniPD’imporzanoGet al. (2009) Assessing amendment properties of digestate by studying the organic matter composition and the degree of biological stability during the anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of MSW. Bioresource Technology100: 3140–3142.
33.
TamboneFTerruzziLScagliaBet al. (2015) Composting of the solid fraction of digestate derived from pig slurry: biological processes and compost properties. Waste Management35: 55–61.
34.
TampioESaloTRintalaJ (2016) Agronomic characteristics of five different urban waste digestates. Journal of Environmental Management169: 293–302.
35.
TangZYuGLiuDet al. (2011) Different analysis techniques for fluorescence excitation–emission matrix spectroscopy to assess compost maturity. Chemosphere82: 1202–1208.
36.
TianWLiLLiuFet al. (2012) Assessment of the maturity and biological parameters of compost produced from dairy manure and rice chaff by excitation-emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy. Bioresource Technology110: 330–337.
37.
TMECC (2000) Test Methods for the Examination of Composting and Compost. Bethesda: US Composting Council.
38.
WalkerLCharlesWCord-RuwischR (2009) Comparison of static, in-vessel composting of MSW with thermophilic anaerobic digestion and combinations of the two processes. Bioresource Technology100: 3799–3807.
39.
ZengJShenXHanLet al. (2016) Dynamics of oxygen supply and consumption during mainstream large-scale composting in China. Bioresource Technology220: 104–109.
40.
ZengYDe GuardiaADabertP (2016b) Improving composting as a post-treatment of anaerobic digestate. Bioresource Technology201: 293–303.
41.
ZhangSChenZWenQet al. (2016) Assessing the stability in composting of penicillin mycelial dreg via parallel factor (PARAFAC) analysis of fluorescence excitation–emission matrix (EEM). Chemical Engineering Journal299: 167–176.
42.
ZhaoFSunQLiJet al. (2010) Effects of different biogas fertilizers on yield, quality and nitrogen use efficiency of the rape. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation24: 127–130.
43.
ZhaoFSunQLiJet al. (2011) Effects of different biogas fertilizers on the yield and nitrogen use efficiency of the rape and western celery. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin27 : 156–161.
44.
ZucconiFPeraAForteMet al. (1981) Evaluating toxicity of immature compost. Biocycle22: 54–57.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
