Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2018-11
Influence of mesophilic and thermophilic conditions on the anaerobic digestion of food waste: Focus on the microbial activity and removal of long chain fatty acids
The mesophilic reactor (MR) exhibited advantages in biogas production and performance stability over thermophilic reactor (TR) during the long-term anaerobic digestion (AD) of food waste (FW) with stepwise organic loading rate elevating. It was interesting to explore the mechanism causing the divergences in performances between these two reactors. The microbial activity was compared on day 110 when TR began to deteriorate. The results show that MR had significantly higher specific acetoclastic methanogenic activities (SAMA) and specific propionate and butyrate oxidative activities (SPOA and SBOA) than TR. The SAMA, SPOA and SBOA in TR were only 50.3%, 18.6% and 46.4% of those values in MR, respectively. Remarkably, the specific hydrogenotrophic methanogenic activity of 15.5±2.1, 15.7±4.6 mmol CH4·L−1 original slurry·d−1 in MR and TR was comparative with insignificant difference, which indicates that the microbial activity in TR had been inhibited widely apart from the hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis. Additionally, many particles with the diameters of 1–2 mm were observed to form in MR and identified as complexes of calcium and long chain fatty acids (LCFAs). The formation of calcium crystallization might alleviate the inhibition of LCFAs during AD of FW, which further supports the better performance in MR than TR.
AngelidakiIAhringB (1992) Effects of free long-chain fatty acids on thermophilic anaerobic digestion. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology37: 808–812.
2.
BayrSRantanenMKaparajuPet al. (2012) Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of rendering plant and slaughterhouse wastes. Bioresource Technology104: 28–36.
3.
CalliBMertogluBInancBet al. (2005) Effects of high free ammonia concentrations on the performances of anaerobic bioreactors. Process Biochemistry40: 1285–1292.
4.
CirneDPaloumetXBjörnssonLet al. (2007) Anaerobic digestion of lipid-rich waste – effects of lipid concentration. Renewable Energy32: 965–975.
5.
DesboisAPSmithVJ (2010) Antibacterial free fatty acids: Activities, mechanisms of action and biotechnological potential. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology85: 1629–1642.
6.
GannounHBouallaguiHOkbiAet al. (2009) Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of biologically pretreated abattoir wastewaters in an upflow anaerobic filter. Journal of Hazardous Materials170: 263–271.
7.
GonenMÖztürkSBalköseDet al. (2010) Preparation and characterization of calcium stearate powders and films prepared by precipitation and Langmuir–Blodgett techniques. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research49: 1732–1736.
8.
GresesSGabyJCAguadoDet al. (2017) Microbial community characterization during anaerobic digestion of Scenedesmus spp. under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. Algal Research27: 121–130.
9.
GrosserANeczajE (2018) Sewage sludge and fat rich materials co-digestion – Performance and energy potential. Journal of Cleaner Production198: 1076–1089.
10.
GuoXWangCSunFet al. (2014) A comparison of microbial characteristics between the thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobic digesters exposed to elevated food waste loadings. Bioresource Technology152: 420–428.
11.
HuYKobayashiTZhenGet al. (2018) Effects of lipid concentration on thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and grease waste in a siphon-driven self-agitated anaerobic reactor. Biotechnology Reports19: e00269. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6036866/ (accessed 26 June 2018).
12.
JamesAChernicharoCALCamposCMM (1990) The development of a new methodology for the assessment of specific methanogenic activity. Water Research24: 813–825.
13.
JinYLiYLiJ (2016) Influence of thermal pretreatment on physical and chemical properties of kitchen waste and the efficiency of anaerobic digestion. Journal of Environmental Management180: 291–300.
14.
KimD-HOhS-E (2011) Continuous high-solids anaerobic co-digestion of organic solid wastes under mesophilic conditions. Waste Management31: 1943–1948.
15.
KimELeeJHanGet al. (2018) Comprehensive analysis of microbial communities in full-scale mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digesters treating food waste-recycling wastewater. Bioresource Technology259: 442–450.
16.
KimS-HHanS-KShinH-S (2004) Kinetics of LCFA inhibition on acetoclastic methanogenesis, propionate degradation and β-oxidation. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A39: 1025–1037.
17.
KleyböckerALienenTLiebrichMet al. (2014) Application of an early warning indicator and CaO to maximize the time–space-yield of an [sic] completely mixed waste digester using rape seed oil as co-substrate. Waste Management34: 661–668.
18.
LabatutRAAngenentLTScottNR (2014) Conventional mesophilic vs. thermophilic anaerobic digestion: A trade-off between performance and stability?Water Research53: 249–258.
19.
LalmanJABagleyDM (2001) Anaerobic degradation and methanogenic inhibitory effects of oleic and stearic acids. Water Research35: 2975–2983.
20.
LiuNJiangJYanFet al. (2018) Optimization of simultaneous production of volatile fatty acids and bio-hydrogen from food waste using response surface methodology. RSC Advances8: 10457–10464.
21.
LiuYPChenXZhuBNet al. (2011) Formation and function of calcium stearate in anaerobic digestion of food waste. Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering5: 2844–2848. [In Chinese.]
22.
LovleyDR (1985) Minimum threshold for hydrogen metabolism in methanogenic bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology49: 1530–1531.
23.
MaoCFengYWangXet al. (2015) Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews45: 540–555.
24.
MicolucciFGottardoMCavinatoCet al. (2016) Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of the liquid fraction of pressed biowaste for high energy yields recovery. Waste Management48: 227–235.
25.
MosetVMortenPRadziahWet al. (2015) Mesophilic versus thermophilic anaerobic digestion of cattle manure: methane productivity and microbial ecology. Microbial Biotechnology8: 787–800.
26.
PalatsiJIllaJPrenafeta-BoldúFXet al. (2010) Long-chain fatty acids inhibition and adaptation process in anaerobic thermophilic digestion: Batch tests, microbial community structure and mathematical modelling. Bioresource Technology101: 2243–2251.
27.
PereiraMPiresOMotaMet al. (2005) Anaerobic biodegradation of oleic and palmitic acids: Evidence of mass transfer limitations caused by long chain fatty acid accumulation onto the anaerobic sludge. Biotechnology and Bioengineering92: 15–23.
28.
PereiraMSousaDMotaMet al. (2004) Mineralization of LCFA associated with anaerobic sludge: Kinetics, enhancement of methanogenic activity, and effect of VFA. Biotechnology and Bioengineering88: 502–511.
29.
PitkPPalatsiJKaparajuPet al. (2014) Mesophilic co-digestion of dairy manure and lipid rich solid slaughterhouse wastes: Process efficiency, limitations and floating granules formation. Bioresource Technology166: 168–177.
30.
RasitNIdrisAHarunRet al. (2015) Effects of lipid inhibition on biogas production of anaerobic digestion from oily effluents and sludges: An overview. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews45: 351–358.
31.
RhimJ-WHongS-IParkH-Met al. (2006) Preparation and characterization of chitosan-based nanocomposite films with antimicrobial activity. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry54: 5814–5822.
32.
SørensenAHAhringBK (1993) Measurements of the specific methanogenic activity of anaerobic digestor biomass. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology40: 427–431.
33.
StollUGuptaH (1997) Management strategies for oil and grease residues. Waste Management & Research15: 23–32.
34.
TianHFotidisIAManciniEet al. (2017) Different cultivation methods to acclimatise ammonia-tolerant methanogenic consortia. Bioresource Technology232: 1–9.
35.
TianHKarachaliosPAngelidakiIet al. (2018) A proposed mechanism for the ammonia–LCFA synergetic co-inhibition effect on anaerobic digestion process. Chemical Engineering Journal349: 574–580.
36.
VavilinVRytowSLokshinaLY (1995) Modelling hydrogen partial pressure change as a result of competition between the butyric and propionic groups of acidogenic bacteria. Bioresource Technology54: 171–177.
37.
WuL-JKobayashiTKuramochiHet al. (2015) Recovery strategies of inhibition for mesophilic anaerobic sludge treating the de-oiled grease trap waste. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation104: 315–323.
38.
WuL-JKobayashiTKuramochiHet al. (2016) Improved biogas production from food waste by co-digestion with de-oiled grease trap waste. Bioresource Technology201: 237–244.
39.
WuL-JKobayashiTKuramochiHet al. (2018) High loading anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and grease trap waste: Determination of the limit and lipid/long chain fatty acid conversion. Chemical Engineering Journal338: 422–431.
40.
YangZWangWHeYet al. (2018) Effect of ammonia on methane production, methanogenesis pathway, microbial community and reactor performance under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. Renewable Energy125: 915–925.
41.
ZhangCSuHBaeyensJet al. (2014) Reviewing the anaerobic digestion of food waste for biogas production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews38: 383–392.
42.
ZhangCSuHTanT (2013a) Batch and semi-continuous anaerobic digestion of food waste in a dual solid–liquid system. Bioresource Technology145: 10–16.
43.
ZhangCXiaoGPengLet al. (2013b) The anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and cattle manure. Bioresource Technology129: 170–176.
44.
ZielsRMKarlssonABeckDACet al. (2016) Microbial community adaptation influences long-chain fatty acid conversion during anaerobic codigestion of fats, oils, and grease with municipal sludge. Water Research103: 372–382.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
