Municipal solid waste (MSW) management is a major concern in Indian cities. This work rigorously assesses the relative costs and the environmental and health benefits of alternative MSW management methods. Management of MSW over the next 20 years for the city of Greater Mumbai was considered. A generic model was developed to determine the costs for (i) dumping on open ground, (ii) sanitary landfill without leachate treatment, (iii) landfilling with leachate treatment and (iv) regional composting and landfilling. LandGEM was used to quantify the gaseous emissions from landfill, while emissions from leachate and composting were taken from literature. The life cycle impact model of one tonne of MSW was developed using OpenLCA software and the International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) 2011 method was used for impact assessment. The cost of disposal of one tonne of waste was found to be INR344 (US$5.17), INR741 (US$11.13) and INR1367 (US$20.53), respectively, for the first three scenarios. As compared to open dumping, landfill gas flaring reduced the global warming potential by 32% and leachate treatment reduced freshwater ecotoxicity and total human toxicity marginally, by 20% and 60%, respectively. Composting-landfilling was the most preferred option, with a cost of INR531 tonne−1 (US$7.97), leading to a reduction in global warming potential by 79% and a slight decrease in freshwater ecotoxicity by 64%. Further, emissions due to accidental fires were also quantified. The study provides valuable insights for the selection of MSW management options for large metropolitan cities in developing countries.
AlexanderABurklinCSingletonA (2005) Landfill Gas Emissions Model (LandGEM) Version 3.02 User’s Guide. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development.
2.
AnnepuRK (2012) Sustainable solid waste management in India. MS Thesis, Columbia University, New York.
3.
BabuGSLakshmikanthanPSanthoshLG (2014) Life cycle analysis of municipal solid waste (MSW) land disposal options in Bangalore city. In: International conference on sustainable infrastructure 2014: Creating infrastructure for a sustainable world (eds CrittendenJHendricksonCWallaceB), Long Beach, USA: American Society of Civil Engineers., 6–8 November, pp. 795–806.
4.
BaidyaSBorken-KleefeldJ (2009) Atmospheric emissions from road transportation in India. Energy Policy37(10): 3812–3822.
5.
BhagatRBJonesGW (2013) Population Change and Migration in Mumbai Metropolitan Region: Implications for Planning and Governance. Working Paper Series No 201. Singapore: Asia Research Institute, National University of Singapore.
Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) (2016) Selection Criteria for Waste Processing Technologies. New Delhi: Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change, Government of India.
8.
ChawatheSD (2013) Manual on Rainfall Analysis for Storm Water Drainage Systems. 2nd ed.Mumbai: VJTI.
9.
ChayaWGheewalaSH (2007) Life cycle assessment of MSW-to-energy schemes in Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production15(15): 1463–1468.
10.
CherubiniFBargigliSUlgiatiS (2009) Life cycle assessment (LCA)of waste management strategies: Landfilling, sorting plant and incineration. Energy34(12): 2116–2123.
11.
City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd (CIDCO) (2014) Draft Interim Development Plan, August 2014. Available at: www.cidco.maharashtra.gov.in/pdf/IDP%20REPORT.pdf (accessed 21 December 2017)
12.
ClearyJ (2009) Life cycle assessments of municipal solid waste management systems: A comparative analysis of selected peer-reviewed literature. Environment International35(8): 1256–1266.
13.
Climate Modeling Forum, India (2009) India’s GHG Emissions Profile: Results of Five Climate Modelling Studies. New Delhi: Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of India.
14.
DamgaardAManfrediSMerrildHStensøeSChristensenTH (2011) LCA and economic evaluation of landfill leachate and gas technologies. Waste Management31(7): 1532–1541.
15.
De FeoGMalvanoC (2009) The use of LCA in selecting the best MSW management system. Waste Management29(6): 1901–1915.
16.
DeSMaitiSHazraTDebsarkarADuttaA (2016) Leachate characterization and identification of dominant pollutants using leachate pollution index for an uncontrolled landfill site. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management2(2): 177–186.
DiazLFGoluekeCGSavageGMEggerthLL (1993) Composting and Recycling Municipal Solid Waste. CRC Press.
19.
EilrichFCDoeksenGAVan FleetH (2003) An economic analysis of landfill costs to demonstrate the economies of size and determine the feasibility of a community owned landfill in rural Oklahoma. In: Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting. Mobile, AL, USA: Southern Agricultural Economic Association, 1–5 February 2003.
20.
FinkbeinerMTanRBHChristiansenKKlüppelHJ (2006) The new international standards for life cycle assessment: ISO 14040 and ISO 14044. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment11(2): 80–85.
21.
FinnvedenGHauschildMZEkvallTGuinéeJHeijungsRHellwegSKoehlerAPenningtonDSuhS (2009) Recent developments in life cycle assessment. Journal of Environmental Management91(1):1–21.
22.
HjelmarOAndersenLHansenJB (2000) Leachate Emissions from Landfills. AFR Report 265. Stockholm: Swedish Environmental Protection Agency.
23.
HoggD (2002) Costs for Municipal Waste Management in the EU. Final report to Director General Environment, European Commission. Eunomia Research and Consulting Ltd. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/studies/pdf/eucostwaste.pdf (accessed 17 July 2018).
24.
HolmbergKAnderssonPNylundNOMäkeläKErdemirA (2014) Global energy consumption due to friction in trucks and buses. Tribology International78: 94–114.
25.
HoornwegDBhada-TataP (2012) What a waste: a global review of solid waste management. Urban development series knowledge papers15: 1–98.
26.
ISO (2006a) ISO 14040 International Standard. Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Principles and Framework. Geneva: International Organisation for Standardization.
27.
ISO (2006b) ISO 14040 International Standard. Environmental Management – Life Cycle Assessment – Requirements and Guidelines. Geneva: International Organisation for Standardization.
28.
JainSK (2012) India’s water balance and evapotranspiration. Current Science (Bangalore). 102(7): 964–967.
29.
JRC (2011) ILCD Handbook – Recommendations for Life Cycle Impact Assessment in the European Context. Luxembourg: Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, European Commission.
30.
JRC (2012) Characterisation Factors of the ILCD Recommended Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods – Database and Supporting Information. Luxembourg: Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, European Commission.
31.
JohannessenLM (1999) Guidance Note on Leachate Management for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills. Urban and Local Government Working Paper Series No UWP 5. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
32.
KhooHH (2009) Life cycle impact assessment of various waste conversion technologies. Waste Management29(6): 1892–1900.
33.
KomilisDPHamRK (2004) Life-cycle inventory of municipal solid waste and yard waste windrow composting in the United States. Journal of Environmental Engineering130(11): 1390–1400.
34.
KumarP (2010) Training Manual on Energy Efficiency for Small and Medium Enterprises. Tokyo: Asian Productivity Organization.
35.
LaurentABakasIClavreulJBernstadANieroMGentilEHauschildMZChristensenTH (2014) Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems – Part I: Lessons learned and perspectives. Waste Management34(3): 573–588.
36.
LemaJMMendezRBlazquezR (1988) Characteristics of landfill leachates and alternatives for their treatment: A review. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution40(3–4): 223–250.
37.
MalikLTiwariGMohanD (2015) Assessment of Heavy Duty Vehicle Characteristics in Delhi: Promoting Low Carbon Transport in India. Nairobi: UNEP.
38.
ManfrediSChristensenTH (2009) Environmental assessment of solid waste landfilling technologies by means of LCA-modeling. Waste Management29(1): 32–43.
39.
MCGM (2017) Advanced Locality Management. Mumbai: Solid Waste Management Department, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai.
40.
MehtaYJosephBShastriY (2018) Economic Analysis and Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Disposal: A Case Study of Mumbai, India: Supplementary Information. Available at: www.che.iitb.ac.in/ys/WMR_SupplementaryInformation.pdf (accessed April 11 2018).
NagpureASRamaswamiARussellA (2015) Characterizing the spatial and temporal patterns of open burning of municipal solid waste (MSW) in Indian cities. Environmental Science and Technology49(21): 12904–12912.
43.
National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI) (2010) Air Quality Assessment, Emissions Inventory and Source Apportionment Studies. Mumbai: NEERI.
44.
NarainSSambyalSS (2016) Not in my Backyard: Solid Waste Management in Indian Cities. New Delhi: Centre for Science and Environment (CSE).
45.
PahadePSNagarabettCH (1997) Performance of multipack compactor trucks. In: CoadA (eds) Lessons from India in Solid Waste Management. Loughborough: Water, Engineering and Development Centre (WEDC).
46.
PenningtonDWPottingJFinnvedenGLindeijerEJollietORydbergTRebitzerG (2004) Life cycle assessment Part 2: Current impact assessment practice. Environment International30(5): 721–739.
47.
PetersMSTimmerhausCDWestRE (2003) Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
RanaAUvoCBBengtssonLSarthiPP (2012) Trend analysis for rainfall in Delhi and Mumbai, India. Climate Dynamics38(1–2): 45–56.
50.
ReichMC (2005) Economic assessment of municipal waste management systems—case studies using a combination of life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC). Journal of Cleaner Production13(3): 253–263.
51.
RenouSGivaudanJGPoulainSDirassouyanFMoulinP (2008) Landfill leachate treatment: review and opportunity. Journal of Hazardous Materials150(3): 468–493.
52.
RosenbaumRKBachmannTMGoldLSHuijbregtsMAJJollietOJuraskeRKoehlerALarsenHFMacLeodMMargniMMcKoneTEPayetJSchuhmacherMMeentDHauschildMZ (2008) USEtox – the UNEP-SETAC toxicity model: Recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment13(7): 532–546.
53.
SharmaBKChandelMK (2017) Life cycle assessment of potential municipal solid waste management strategies for Mumbai, India. Waste Management and Research35: 79–91.
54.
SilAKumarSKumarR (2014a) Formulating LandGem model for estimation of landfill gas under Indian scenario. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management17(2–4): 293–299.
55.
SilAKumarSWongJWC (2014b) Development of correction factors for landfill gas emission model suiting Indian condition to predict methane emission from landfills. Bioresource Technology168: 97–99.
56.
TanSTHoWSHashimHLeeCTTaibMRHoCS (2015) Energy, economic and environmental (3E) analysis of waste-to-energy (WTE) strategies for municipal solid waste (MSW) management in Malaysia. Energy Conversion and Management102: 111–120.
57.
TchobanoglousGTheisenHVigilS (1993) Integrated Solid Waste Management: Engineering Principles and Management Issues. New York: McGraw Hill.
58.
USEPA (2000) Life Cycle Inventory and Cost Model for Mixed Municipal and Yard Waste Composting. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development.
59.
USEPA (2007) Report of the Pump Test and Pre-feasibility Study for Landfill Gas Recovery and Utilization at the Deonar Landfill Mumbai, India. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Landfill Methane Outreach Program.
60.
WiedinmyerCYokelsonRJGullettBK (2014) Global emissions of trace gases, particulate matter, and hazardous air pollutants from open burning of domestic waste. Environmental Science and Technology48(16): 9523–9530.
61.
WorrellWAVesilindPALudwigC (2017) Solid Waste Engineering: A Global Perspective. 3rd ed.Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
