A municipal solid waste fee has become an important means for the implementation of the waste management rendered by the government all around the world. Based on the ecological environmental compensation theory, this article constructs an analytical framework of waste charging from the perspective of public policy evaluation, to carry on the comprehensive comparison and analysis to the operability, feasibility, validity, rationality, and universality of the two modes of waste charging: Ration charge and unit-pricing modes. The results indicate that in the cities with large amounts of waste production, long time of waste charging, and high disposal rate, pilot projects should be carried out; and the government needs to improve the construction of associated laws and regulations.
AllenB (2009) Colombia s discharge fee program: Incentives for polluters or regulators. Journal of Environmental Management90: 101–119.
2.
CallanSJThomasJM (1997) The impact of state and local policies on the recycling effort. Eastern Economic Journal 23: 411–423.
3.
ChenFM (2009) A comparative study on the ways of municipal solid waste charging. China Economist12: 57–58.
4.
ChenH (1996) Solid waste control through consumption and production behavioral changes with case studies of the United States and Taiwan. Cornell University.
5.
ChenKLiangJS (2002) Pricing and charge system of domestic waste of Beijing. Resources Science5: 93–96.
6.
DengE (2002) Introduction to public policy analysis. China Renmin University Press.
7.
DijkgraafEGradusRHJM (2004) Cost savings in unit-based pricing of household waste: The case of The Netherlands. Resource and Energy Economics26: 353–371.
8.
DingC (2007) International experience of charge system of municipal solid rubbish and enlightenment. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics4: 6–13.
9.
DuWPGaoQXZhangECet al. (2006) The emission status and composition analysis of municipal solid waste in China. Research of Environmental Sciences5: 85–90.
10.
FolzDHGilesJN (2002) Municipal experience with ‘Pay-as-You-Throw’ policies: Findings from a national survey. State & Local Government Review 34: 105–115.
11.
FullertonDKinnamanTC (1996) Household responses to pricing garbage by the bag. American Economic Review86: 971–984.
12.
GellynckXVerhelstP (2007) Assessing instruments for mixed household solid waste collection services in the Flemish region of Belgium. Resources Conservation & Recycling49: 372–387.
13.
HoggD (2002) Costs for municipal waste management in the EU: Final report to Directorate General Environment. European Commission.
14.
HouXL (2005) Treatment current situation and counter measures of municipal refuse utilization in China. Pollution Control Technology6: 19–23.
15.
JenkinsRR (1993) The economics of solid waste reduction: The impact of user fees. Hampshire: E Elgar.
16.
JiangY (2001) Problems of urban domestic garbage charges and their solutions. Science & Technology Review6: 55–57.
17.
LiDY (2005) Theoretical analysis of waste charging. The Theory Monthly12: 103–107.
18.
LiSL (2002) Establishing market operation mechanism is crucial. China Environment News21January. Available at: http://www.cenews.com.cn/
19.
LinSBZhangSX (1982) Public policy. Wu-Nan Book Company.
20.
MaBDuQQ(2011) Study on the contrast of the methods of charging municipal solid waste in China. Journal of China University of Geosciences (Social Sciences Edition)5: 7–14.
21.
MirandaMLEverettJWBlumeDet al. (1994) Market-based incentives and residential municipal solid waste. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management13: 681–698.
22.
National Bureau of Statistics of China (2016) 2016 China statistical yearbook. National Bureau of Statistics of China.
23.
OhmiyaHYorimitsuHOshimaK (2006) Cobalt (diamine)-catalyzed cross-coupling reaction of alkyl halides with arylmagnesium reagents: Stereoselective constructions of arylated asymmetric carbons and application to total synthesis of AH13205. Journal of the American Chemical Society128: 1886–1889.
24.
QiuSF (2005) An analysis on circular economy and options of urban domestic garbage charge modes. Shanghai Environmental Sciences2: 57–60.
25.
RenQM (2013) Brief analyse the ways of charging garbage fee. Guide of Sci-tech Magazine21: 317.
26.
SakaiSIkematsuTHiraiYet al. (2008) Unit-charging programs for municipal solid waste in Japan. Waste Management28: 2815–2825.
27.
StavinsRN (1993) Market forces can help lower waste volumes. Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy1: 6–15.
TakaharaSKusumotoYMiyamotoS (2003) Solution for textile nesting problems using adaptive meta-heuristics and grouping. Soft Computing7: 154–159.
31.
TanLZLuMZChenYY. (2008) Analysis on the suitable characteristics of trash charge system in garbage disposal in China. China Population Resources and Environment2: 181–186.
VickersG (1995) The Art of Judgment. SAGE Publishing.
34.
WertzLK (1976) Economic factors influencing household’s production of refuse. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management2: 263–272.
35.
YangLLiGPYuYG (2010) The international comparison of waste charging system and its enlightenment to China. Theory and Practice5: 42–43.
36.
ZhangXCLiDYet al (2005a) Contrast of two methods to charge municipal solid waste. Ecological Economy10: 98–100.
37.
ZhangZFXuXQZhouHC (2005b) International comparative study on the role of government in the development of social science and technology. Review of Economic Research14: 10–20.
