In France, domestic waste production is estimated at c. 350 kg year−1 per person and landfilling still represents a predominant way of municipal solid waste management, with 39% of waste dumped in 2007. Waste characterization campaigns were conducted at different stages of a mechanical–biological treatment process in order to evaluate its efficiency. Waste samples were sorted by size (>100 mm, <100–20 mm and <20 mm) in order to assess the opportunity for mechanical and aerobic degradation and to reduce the volume of waste landfilled. The monitoring of parameter characteristics of waste stabilization highlighted a decrease in both organic matter and oxidizable organic matter, and an increase in fine particles <20 mm. The respirometric index after 4 days performed on waste samples from the pre-treatment stage showed a decrease in the biological activity compared with the samples taken upstream in the process. The biochemical methane potential of the waste is above the German limit of acceptance in landfills. This intermediate phase of stabilization is confirmed by the results of the leaching tests and hydrophobic fractionation.
Abfallablagerungsverordnung, AbfAblV (2001) Ordinance on Environ-mentally Compatible Storage of Waste from Human Settlements, February.
2.
AdaniFConfalonieriRTamboneF (2004) Dynamic respiration index as a descriptor of the biological stability of organic wastes. Journal of Environmental Quality33: 1866–1876.
3.
ADEME (1993) MODECOM. Méthode de Caractérisation des Ordures Ménagères. Paris: ADEME éditions.
4.
AFNOR. NF U44–160 (1985) Organic Soil-Conditioners and Organic Material for Soil Improvement – Determination of Total Organic Matter – Calcination Method.
5.
AFNOR. XP U44–164 (2004) Organic Soil Conditioners and Organic Material for Soil Improvement – Determination of Total Organic Matter – Calcination Method.
6.
BarrenarRd’ImporzanoGPonsáSGeaTArtolaAVázquezFSánchezAAdaniF (2009) In search of a reliable technique for the determination of the biological stability of the organic matter in the mechanical–biological treated waste. Journal of Hazardous Materials162: 1065–1072.
7.
BayardRde Araújo MoraisJDucomGAchourFRouezMGourdonR (2009) Assessment of the effectiveness of an industrial unit of mechanical biological treatment of municipal solid waste. Journal of Hazardous Materials175: 23–32.
8.
BertheCRedonEFeuilladeG (2008) Fractionation of the organic matter contained in leachate resulting from two modes of landfilling: an indicator of waste degradation. Journal of Hazardous Materials154: 262–271.
9.
BilgiliMSDemirAOzkayaB (2007) Influence of leachate recirculation on aerobic and anaerobic decomposition of solid wastes. Journal of Hazardous Materials145: 186–194.
10.
BinnerE (2003) Assessment of MBP waste – misinterpretations of respiration activity. In: ChristensenTHCossuRStegmannR (eds) Ninth International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium, S. Margherita di Pula, Cagliari, Italy.
11.
ChynowethDPTurickCEOwensJMJergermDEPeckMW (1993) Biochemical methane potential of biomass and waste feedstocks. Biomass and Bioenergy5(1): 95–111.
12.
CossuRRagaR (2008) Test methods for assessing the biological stability of biodegradable waste. Waste Management28: 381–388.
13.
CossuRLaiTSalinLSandonA (2011) Standardization of BOD5/COD ratio as a biological stability index for MSW. In: Thirteenth International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium, 3–7 October, Cagliari, Italy.
14.
De Araújo MoraisJDucomGAchourFRouezMBayardR (2008) Mass balance to assess the efficiency of a mechanical–biological treatment. Waste Management28: 1791–1800.
15.
Feuillade-CathalifaudGPallierVParodiARedonE (2009) La matière organique du lixiviat comme indicateur de la stabilisation des déchets: application à des pilotes semi-industriels. GF-IHSS 2009 – Matières Organiques dans un Environnement en Evolution, 24–25November, Montpellier, France.
16.
FrancouC (2003) Stabilisation de la matière organique au cours du compostage de déchets urbains: influence de la nature des déchets et du procédé de compostage – recherche d’indicateurs pertinents. Thèse, l’Institut National Agronomique Paris-Grignon.
17.
FrickeKSantenHWallmannR (2005) Comparison of selected aerobic and anaerobic procedures for MSW treatment. Waste Management25: 799–810.
18.
HeasmanL (1997) Leaching tests to assess the environmental impact of waste. In: Proceedings Sardinia, Cagliari, Italy.
19.
ISO 11734 (1995) Water Quality – Evaluation of the Ultimate Anaerobic Biodegradability of Organic Compounds in Digested Sludge – Method by Measurement of the Biogas Production.
20.
LabanowskiJFeuillade-CathalifaudG (2009) Combination of biodegradable organic matter quantification and XAD-fractionation as effective working parameter for the study of biodegradability in environmental and anthropic samples. Chemosphere74: 605–611.
21.
LeikamKStegmannR (1995) The emission behaviour of mechanically– biologically pretreated residual waste. Waste Reports Emissionsverhalten von Restmull. Vienna: ABF-BOKU.
22.
LouZDongBChaiXSongYZhaoYZhuN (2009) Characterization of refuse landfill leachates of three different stages in landfill stabilization process. Journal of Environmental Sciences21: 1309–1314.
23.
MillotN (1986) Les lixiviats de décharges contrôlées. Caractérisation analytique et études des filières de traitement. Thèse de doctorat, INSA de Lyon.
24.
OwenWFStuckeyDCHealeyJBYoungLYMcCartyPL (1979) Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicity. Water Research13: 485–492.
25.
ParodiAFeuillade-CathalifaudGPallierVMansourA (2011) Optimization of municipal solid waste leaching test procedure: Assessment of the part hydrosoluble organic compounds. Journal of Hazardous Materials186: 991–998.
26.
PonsáSGeaTAlermLCerezoJSánchezA (2008) Comparison of aerobic and anaerobic stability indices through a MSW biological treatment process. Waste Management28: 2735–2742.
27.
Sanchez-MonederoMARoigAParedesCBernalMP (2001) Nitrogen transformation during organic waste composting by the Rugers system and its effects on pH, EC, and maturity of the composting mixtures. Bioresource Technology78: 301–308.
28.
ScagliaBAdaniF (2008) An index for quantifying the aerobic reactivity of municipal solid wastes and derived waste products. Science of the Total Environment394: 183–191.
29.
ScagliaBConfalonieriRD’ImporzanoGAdaniF (2010) Estimating biogas production of biologically treated municipal solid waste. Bioresource Technology101(3): 945–952.
30.
ZhuBGikasPZhangRLordJJenkinsBLiX (2009) Characteristics and biogas production potential of municipal solid wastes pretreated with a rotary drum reactor. Bioresource Technology100: 1122–1129.
