The increase in the quantity of municipal solid waste generated as a result of population growth in most urban areas has resulted in the difficulty of locating suitable land areas to be used as landfills. To curb this, waste transfer stations are used. The Kumasi Metropolitan Area, even though it has an engineered landfill, is faced with the problem of waste collection from the generation centres to the final disposal site. Thus in this study, multi-criteria decision analysis incorporated into a geographic information system was used to determine potential waste transfer station sites. The key result established 11 sites located within six different sub-metros. This result can be used by decision makers for site selection of the waste transfer stations after taking into account other relevant ecological and economic factors.
AlanbariMAAlanbariNJasimHK. (2014) Modeling landfill suitability based on GIS and multicriteria decision analysis: case study in Al-Mahaweelqadaa. Natural Science6: 828–851.
2.
BarzilaiJ (1997) Deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices. Journal of Operational Research Society48: 1226–1232.
3.
BoroushakiSMalczewskiJ (2010) Participatory GIS: a web-based collaborative GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. URISA22: 23–32.
4.
BoveaMDPowellJCGallardoA. (2007) The role played by environmental factors in the integration of a transfer station in a municipal solid waste management system. Waste Management27: 545–553.
5.
BuckleyJJ (1985a) Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems17: 233–247.
6.
BuckleyJJ (1985b) Ranking alternatives using fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets and Systems15: 21–31.
7.
BuckleyJJFeuringTHayashiY (2001) Fuzzy hierarchical analysis revisited. European Journal of Operational Research129: 48–64.
8.
ChangSKJLeiH-LJungS-T. (2008) Note on deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices in AHP. International Journal of Information and Management Sciences19: 507–517.
9.
CrawfordGWilliamsC (1985) A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices. Journal of Mathematical Psychology29: 387–405.
10.
DeAngeloMM (2004) Siting of Waste-to-Energy Facility in New York City Using GIS Technology. Columbia, NY: Columbia University, pp. 1–41.
11.
DrobneSLisecA (2009) Multi-attribute decision analysis in GIS: weighted linear combination and ordered weighted averaging. Informatica33: 459–474.
12.
EastmanJRJinWKyemPAK. (1995) Raster procedures for multi-criteria/multi-objective decision. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing61: 539–547.
13.
EastmanJRKyemPAKToledanoJ. (1993) GIS and decision making. Explorations in Geographic Information System Technology1.
14.
EminsangEF (2011) Managing growth in Ghanaian Cities – the role of peripheral district centres. Unpublished MSc thesis, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi.
15.
ErkutEMoranSR (1991) Locating obnoxious facilities in the public sector: an application of the hierarchy process to municipal landfill siting decisions. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences25: 89–102.
16.
EskandariMHomaeeMMahmodiS (2012) An integrated multi criteria approach for landfill siting in a conflicting environmental, economical and socio-cultural area. Waste Management32: 1528–1538.
17.
GilYKellermanA (1989) A Multicriteria Model for the Location of Solid Waste Transfer Stations: The Case of Ashdod, Israel. Haifa: University of Haifa.
18.
Ghana Statistical Services (GSS) (2013) 2010 Population and Housing Final Results. Ghana Statistical Services (accessed 14 March).
19.
HopkinsL (1977) Methods for generating land suitability maps: a comparative evaluation. Journal for American Institute of Planners34: 19–29.
20.
KhanDSamadderSR (2014) Municipal solid waste management using geographical information system aided methods: a mini review. Waste Management & Research32: 1049–1062.
KordiMBrandtSA (2012) Effects of increasing fuzziness on analytic hierarchy process for spatial multicriteria decision analysis. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems36: 43–53.
23.
MalczewskiJ (1999) GIS and Multicriteria Decision Analysis. New York: Wiley.
24.
MalczewskiJ (2000) On the use of weighted linear combination method in GIS: common and best practical approaches. Transactions in GIS4: 5–22.
25.
Mensah-BonsuIFOwusu-MensahJK (2011) State of the environment in Kumasi. Future of the Tree Towards Growth and Development of Kumasi. Kumasi: University Printing Press, pp. 94–174.
26.
NasBCayTIscanF. (2009) Selection of MSW landfill site for Konya, Turkey using GIS and multi-criteria evaluation. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment2010: 491–500.
27.
ÖbergH (2011) A GIS-based Study of Sites for Decentralized Composting and Waste Sorting Stations in Kumasi, Ghana. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Uppsala.
28.
RafieeRNematolahKAbdolrassoulSM. (2011) Siting transfer station for municipal solid waste using a spatial multi-criteria analysis. Environmental and Engineering Geoscience17: 143–154.
29.
SaatyTL (1980) The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw Hill.
30.
United State Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2002) Waste transfer stations: a manual for decision making. In: Agency USEP (ed.) Solid Waste and Emergency Response, EPA530-R-02–002. Washington, DC: USEPA.
31.
United State Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2004) Waste Transfer Station: A Manual for Decision-Making. Washington, DC: USEPA.
32.
WashburnBE (2012) Avian use of solid waste transfer stations. Landscape and Urban Planning104: 388–394.
33.
YazdaniMMonavariSMMonavariGA. (2015) Landfill site suitability assessment by means of geographic information system analysis. Solid Earth6: 945–956.
34.
ZurbrüggC (2002) Urban solid waste management in low-income countries of asia how to cope with the garbage crisis. Presented for: Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment (SCOPE), Durban, South Africa, pp. 1–11.
