Those responsible for developing sustainable solid waste management programmes must consider the impacts of programme elements on everyone involved. This paper focuses on identifying the effects of waste management activities and assessing their overall impact on stakeholders. Collaborating with four focus groups and 36 experts, 19 effects were identified and nine questionnaires were designed to evaluate them, one for each stakeholder group. All told, 1805 people took part in the survey. The results show that the effects most important to the survey participants are: (a) recycling solid urban waste, (b) pollution and (c) corporate social responsibility.
AbarcaLMaasGHoglandW (2013) Solid waste management challenges for cities in developing countries. Waste Management33(1): 220–232. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.09.008
2.
AbbaAHNoorZZYusufRFDinMFMDHassanMAA (2013) Assessing environmental impacts of municipal solid waste of Johor by analytical hierarchy process. Resources, Conservation and Recycling73: 188–196.
3.
AchillasCMoussiopoulosNKaragiannidisABaniasGPerkoulidisG (2013) The use of multi-criteria decision analysis to tackle waste management problems: a literature review. Waste Management & Research31(2): 115–129. http://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X12470203
4.
AlleschABrunnerP (2014) Assessment methods for solid waste management: a literature review. Waste Management & Research32(6): 461–473.
5.
ArgandoñaA (2004) On ethical, social and environmental management systems. Journal of Business Ethics51(1): 41–52.
6.
Asociación Nacional de Empresas Públicas de Medioambiente (ANEPMA) (2011) From:http://www.anepma.es/ (accessed January 20, 2011)
7.
BanvilleCLandryMMartelJ (1998) A stakeholder approach to MCDA. Systems Research and Behavioral Science15(1): 15–32.
8.
BlancIFriotDMargniMJollietO (2004) How to Assess the Environmental State of EU Regions with Global Concept of Sustainability. Geneva: EnviroInfo, ISBN 28–29–30–275–3.
9.
BrysonJM (2004) What to do when stakeholders matter. Public Management Review6(1): 21–53.
CaniatoMVaccariMVisvanathanCZurbrügg (2014) Using social network and stakeholder analysis to help evaluate infectious waste management: a step towards a holistic assessment. Waste Management34: 938–951.
Chung-ChiangC (2010) A performance evaluation of MSW management practice in Taiwan. Resources, Conservation and Recycling54: 1353–1361.
14.
CochranPL (2007) The evolution of corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons50(6): 449–454.
15.
CucekLKlemesJJKravanjaZ (2012).A review of footprint analysis tools for monitoring impacts on sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production34: 9–20.
16.
DelmasMToffelW (2004) Stakeholders and environmental management practices: an institutional framework. Business Strategy and the Environment13(4): 209–222.
17.
DowieWAMcCartneyDMTammJA (1998) A case study of an institutional solid waste environmental management system. Journal of Environmental Management53(2): 137–146.
18.
DuhéSC (2009) Good management, sound finances, and social responsibility: two decades of US corporate insider perspectives on reputation and the bottom line. Public Relations Review35(1): 77–78.
19.
Ecorys and IDEA (2009) Study of the competitiveness of the EU eco-industry. Study prepared for the European Commission. Brussels, 22 October 2009.
20.
EpsteinMJRoyMJ (2001) Sustainability in action: identifying and measuring the key performance drivers. Long Range Planning34: 585–604.
21.
EpsteinMJWidenerSK (2011) Facilitating sustainable development decisions: measuring stakeholder reactions. Business Strategy and the Environment20: 107–123.
22.
FreemanRE (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
23.
GrolinJ (1998) Corporate legitimacy in risk society: the case of Brent Spar. Business Strategy and the Environment7(2): 213–222.
24.
HassanAIbrahimE (2012) Corporate environmental information disclosure: factors influencing companies’ success in attaining environmental awards. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management19: 32–46. doi: 10.1002/csr.278
KaspersonRE (2006) Editorial: Rerouting the stakeholder express. Global Environmental Change16(4): 320–322.
35.
KruegerRACaseyMA (2009) Focus Groups: a Practical Guide for Applied Research. 4rd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36.
KulkarniSP (2000) Environmental ethics and information asymmetry among organizational stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics27(3): 215–228.
37.
McLeodFCherrettT (2008) Quantifying the transport impacts of domestic waste collection strategies. Waste Management28: 2271–2278.
38.
MitchellRKAgleBRWoodDJ (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review22(4): 853–886.
39.
MonteiroSMSGuzmanBA (2010) Determinants of environmental disclosure in the annual reports of large companies operating in Portugal. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management17: 185–204.
40.
MorrisseyAJBrowneJ (2004) Waste management models and their application to sustainable waste management. Waste Management24(3): 297–308.
41.
MoyPKrishnanbNUlloaPCohenSBrandt-RaufPW (2008) Options for management of municipal solid waste in New York City: a preliminary comparison of health risks and policy implications. Journal of Environmental Management87: 73–79
42.
MullerMHoffmanL (2001) Community Partnerships in Integrated Sustainable Waste Management: Tools for Decision-makers. Experiences from the Urban Waste Expertise Programme (1995–2001). The Netherlands: Waste.
43.
Nilsson-DjerfJMcDougallF (2000) Social factors in sustainable waste management. Warmer Bulletin73: 18–20.
44.
PappuaASaxenaaMAsolekarSR (2007) Solid wastes generation in India and their recycling potential in building materials. Building and Environment42: 2311–2320.
45.
PettsJ (2000) Municipal waste management: inequities and the role of deliberation. Risk Analysis20(6): 821–832.
46.
PiresAMartinhoGChangN-B (2011) Solid waste management in European countries: a review of systems analysis Techniques. Journal of Environmental Management92: 1033–1050.
47.
PorterMEKramerMR (2002) The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review80(12): 56–68.
48.
PriceJLJosephJB (2000) Demand management – a basis for waste policy: a critical review of the applicability of the waste hierarchy in terms of achieving sustainable waste management. Sustainable Development8: 96–105.
49.
PsomopoulosCSBourkaAThemelisNJ (2009) Waste-to-energy: a review of the status and benefits in USA. Waste Management29(5): 1718–1724.
50.
Rubio-RomeroJCArjona-JimenezRLópez-ArquillosA (2013) Profitability analysis of biogas recovery in municipal solid waste landfills. Journal of Cleaner Production55: 84–91.
51.
Rubio-RomeroJCSuárez-CebadorMLópez-ArquillosAPardo-FerreiraMC (2014) Identification of main stakeholders in the municipal solid waste companies. In: Urban Environmental Pollution Conference (UEP 2014), 12–15 June 2014, Toronto, Canada.
52.
SharrattPNChoongPM (2002) A life-cycle framework to analyse business risk in process industry projects. Journal of Cleaner Production10(5): 479–493.
53.
SoltaniAHewageKRezaBSadiqR (2015) Multiple stakeholders in multi-criteria decision-making in the context of municipal solid waste management: a review. Waste Management35: 318–328.
54.
TinAWiseDSuWReutergardhLLeeS (1995) Cost-benefit analysis of the municipal solid waste collection system in Yangong, Myanmar. Resources, Conservation and Recycling14: 103–131.
55.
UNEP and CalRecovery (2005) Solid Waste Management. United Nations Environment Programme.
Van de KlundertAAnschützJ (2001) Integrated Sustainable Waste Management – the Concept: Tools for Decision-makers. Experiences from the Urban Waste Expertise Programme (1995–2001). Waste: Gouda, The Netherlands. www.waste.nl
WilsonDCSmithNABlakeyNCShaxsonL (2007) Using research-based knowledge to underpin waste and resources policy. Waste Management & Research25: 247–256
60.
ZurbrüggCGfrererMAshadiHBrennerWKüperD (2012) Determinants of sustainability in solid waste management – the Gianyar Waste Recovery Project in Indonesia. Waste Management32: 2126–2133.
61.
ZyglidopoulosSC (2002) The social and environmental responsibilities of multinationals: evidence from the Brent Spar case. Journal of Business Ethics36(2): 141–151.
