Reverse logistics in construction refers to the movement of products and materials from salvaged buildings to a new construction site. While there is a plethora of studies looking at various aspects of the reverse logistics chain, there is no systematic review of literature on this important subject as applied to the construction industry. Therefore, the objective of this study is to integrate the fragmented body of knowledge on reverse logistics in construction, with the aim of promoting the concept among industry stakeholders and the wider construction community. Through a qualitative meta-analysis, the study synthesises the findings of previous studies and presents some actions needed by industry stakeholders to promote this concept within the real-life context. First, the trend of research and terminology related with reverse logistics is introduced. Second, it unearths the main advantages and barriers of reverse logistics in construction while providing some suggestions to harness the advantages and mitigate these barriers. Finally, it provides a future research direction based on the review.
AddisW (2006a) Case studies of reuse and recycling. In: AddisW (ed.) Building with Reclaimed Components and Materials: A Design Handbook for Reuse and Recycling. London: Earthscan.
2.
AddisW (2006b) The world of reclamation, reuse and recycling. In: AddisW (ed.) Building with Reclaimed Components and Materials: A Design Handbook for Reuse and Recycling. London: Earthscan.
3.
AidonisDXanthopoulosAVlachosD. (2008) An analytical methodological framework for managing reverse supply chains in the construction industry. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development4: 1036–1046.
4.
AkbarnezhadAOngKCGChandraLR (2014) Economic and environmental assessment of deconstruction strategies using building information modeling. Automation in Construction37: 131–144.
5.
Al-SariMIAl-KhatibIAAvraamidesM. (2012) A study on the attitudes and behavioural influence of construction waste management in occupied Palestinian territory. Waste Management & Research30: 122–136.
6.
AlbaloushiHSkitmoreM (2008) Supply chain management in the UAE construction industry. International Journal of Construction Management8: 53–71.
7.
AnggadjajaE (2014) Barriers for deconstruction and reuse/recycling of construction materials in Singapore. In: NakajimaSRussellM (eds) Barriers for Deconstruction and Reuse/Recycling of Construction Materials. CIB Publication397.
8.
AouadGCooperRKagioglouM. (1999) The development of a process map for the construction sector. In: Customer satisfaction: A focus of research and practice in construction, proceedings of joint triennial symposium CIB W65 and W55, Cape Town, South Africa, 5–10September1999, 139–147. Rotterdam, Netherlands: The International Building Council for Research and Innovation.
9.
BaiCSarkisJ (2013) Flexibility in reverse logistics: A framework and evaluation approach. Journal of Cleaner Production47: 306–318.
10.
BallouRH (2007) The evolution and future of logistics and supply chain management. European Business Review19: 332–348.
11.
BarrosAIDekkerRScholtenV (1998) A two-level network for recycling sand: A case study. European Journal of Operational Research110: 199–214.
12.
BleekM (2011) An assessment of timber dwellings typical of the queenslander era, and constraints associated with their relocation, component and adaptive reuse when considering ‘re-generation reuse’. In: The 1st international postgraduate conference on engineering, designing and developing the built environment for sustainable wellbeing (EDDBE2011), Queensland University Technology, Brisbane, Australia, 27–29April. Brisbane, Australia: QUT ePrints.
13.
BleekMJ (2013) Regeneration reuse in the context of the waste management cycle of the built environment. Queensland University of Technology.
14.
BritoMDekkerR (2004) A framework for reverse logistics. In: DekkerRFleischmannMInderfurthK. (eds) Reverse Logistics. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 3–27.
15.
CatalliVWilliamsM (2001) Designing for disassembly. The Canadian Architect46: 27.
16.
ChenZLiHWongCT (2003) Webfill before landfill: An e-commerce model for waste exchange in Hong Kong. Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management3: 27–43.
17.
ChindaT (2013) Analytic hierarchy process of reverse logistics in the construction industry. In: ChindaT (ed.) The 4th international conference on engineering, project, and production management (EPPM 2013), Bangkok, Thailand, 3–25October. Pingtung, Taiwan: Association of Engineering, Project, and Production Management.
18.
ChiniABuckR (2014) Barriers for deconstruction and reuse/recycling of construction materials in U.S.A. In: NakajimaSRussellM (eds) Barriers for Deconstruction and Reuse/Recycling of Construction Materials. CIB Publication397.
19.
ChiniARBrueningS (2003) Deconstruction and materials reuse in the United States. The Future of Sustainable Construction Special Issue article: published 14thMay2003.
20.
CoelhoAde BritoJ (2011) Economic analysis of conventional versus selective demolition—A case study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling55: 382–392.
21.
CrowtherP (1999) Historic trends in building disassembly. In: Technology in transition: Mastering the impacts, Montreal, Canada, 25–29June. Washington, DC: Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture.
22.
CrowtherP (2000) Developing guidelines for designing for deconstruction. Deconstruction - Closing the Loop. Watford, UK: BRE.
23.
CrowtherP (2001) Developing an inclusive model for design for deconstruction. In: ChiniA (ed.) Deconstruction and materials reuse; technology, economics, and policy, CIB Publication 266, CIB Task Group 39 – Deconstruction, annual meeting, Wellington, New Zealand, 6April. Rotterdam, Netherlands: The International Building Council for Research and Innovation.
24.
CrowtherP (2002) Design for buildability and the deconstruction consequences. In: ChiniASchultmannF (eds) Deconstruction and Materials Reuse; Technology, Economics, and Policy, CIB Publication 272, CIB Task Group 39 – Deconstruction, Annual Meeting, Karlsruhe, Germany, 9April. Rotterdam, Netherlands: The International Building Council for Research and Innovation.
25.
CrowtherP (2009) Designing for disassembly. In: NewtonPDrogemullerRHampsonK (eds) Technology, Design and Process Innovation in the Built Environment. Independence, KY, USA: Taylor & Francis.
26.
da RochaCGSattlerMA (2009) A discussion on the reuse of building components in Brazil: An analysis of major social, economical and legal factors. Resources, Conservation and Recycling54: 104–112.
27.
DantataNTouranAWangJ (2005) An analysis of cost and duration for deconstruction and demolition of residential buildings in Massachusetts. Resources, Conservation and Recycling44: 1–15.
28.
DenhartH (2010) Deconstructing disaster: Economic and environmental impacts of deconstruction in post-Katrina New Orleans. Resources, Conservation and Recycling54: 194–204.
29.
Densley TingleyDDavisonB (2012) Developing an LCA methodology to account for the environmental benefits of design for deconstruction. Building and Environment57: 387–395.
30.
DowlatshahiS (2005) A strategic framework for the design and implementation of remanufacturing operations in reverse logistics. International Journal of Production Research43: 3455–3480.
31.
DurmisevicEBinnemarsS (2014) Barriers for deconstruction and reuse/recycling of construction materials in Netherlands. In: NakajimaSRussellM (eds) Barriers for Deconstruction and Reuse/Recycling of Construction Materials. CIB Publication397.
32.
DurmisevicEYeangK (2009) Designing for disassembly (DfD). Architectural Design79: 134–137.
33.
EarleJErgunDGorgolewskiM (2014) Barriers for deconstruction and reuse/recycling of construction materials in Canada. In: NakajimaSRussellM (eds) Barriers for Deconstruction and Reuse/Recycling of Construction Materials. CIB Publication397.
GlassJ (2012) The state of sustainability reporting in the construction sector. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment1: 87–104.
36.
GlassJDaintyARJ (2011) The sustainable construction business: A missing ingredient in creating a sustainable built environment?International Journal of Construction Management11: 1–18.
37.
González-TorrePAlvarezMSarkisJ. (2010) Barriers to the implementation of environmentally oriented reverse logistics: Evidence from the automotive industry sector. British Journal of Management21: 889–904.
38.
GorgolewskiM (2008) Designing with reused building components: Some challenges. Building Research & Information36: 175–188.
39.
GreerD (2004) Building the deconstruction industry. BioCycle45: 36–42.
40.
GuyB (2014) Survey of deconstruction operations by building materials reuse organizations in the US. In: NakajimaSRussellM (eds) Barriers for Deconstruction and Reuse/Recycling of Construction Materials. CIB Publication397.
GuyBMcLendonS (2002) Building deconstruction: Reuse and recycling of building materials. Gainesville, Florida, USA: Center for Construction and Environment, University of Florida. Available at: http://www.recyclecddebris.com/rCDd/Resources/CaseStudies.aspx (accessed 28 August 2013).
43.
GuyBShellSEsherickH (2006) Design for deconstruction and materials reuse. Proceedings of the CIB Task Group39: 189–209.
44.
HällgrenM (2012) The construction of research questions in project management. International Journal of Project Management30: 804–816.
45.
HieteMStengelJLudwigJ. (2011) Matching construction and demolition waste supply to recycling demand: a regional management chain model. Building Research & Information39: 333–351.
46.
HoltGDGouldingJSAkintoyeA. (2014) Interrelationships between theory and research impact: Views from a survey of UK academics. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management21: 674–696.
47.
HosseiniMRChilesheNRameezdeenR. (2015) Integration of design for reverse logistics and harvesting of information: A research agenda. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management20: 480–515.
48.
HosseiniMRChilesheNRameezdeenR. (2014a) Reverse logistics for the construction industry: Lessons from the manufacturing context. International Journal of Construction Engineering and Management3: 75–90.
49.
HosseiniMRRameezdeenRChilesheN. (2014b) Adoption of reverse logistics in South Australian construction projects: Major drivers. In: TamošaitienėJ (ed.) The 5th International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Production Management (EPPM 2014), Port Elizabeth, South Africa, 26–28November. Pingtung, Taiwan: Association of Engineering, Project, and Production Management.
50.
JaillonLPoonCS (2014) Life cycle design and prefabrication in buildings: A review and case studies in Hong Kong. Automation in Construction39: 195–202.
51.
KernanP (2002) Old to new: Design guide salvaged building materials in new construction. Greater Vancouver Regional District Policy & Planning Department.
52.
KibertCJ (2007) The next generation of sustainable construction. Building Research & Information35: 595–601.
53.
KibertCJ (2012) Closing materials loop. In: KibertCJ (ed.) Sustainable Construction: Green Building Design and Delivery. 3rd ed.Hoboken: Wiley.
54.
KibertCJSendzimirJGuyB (2000) Construction ecology and metabolism: Natural system analogues for a sustainable built environment. Construction Management & Economics18: 903–916.
55.
KibertCJSendzimirJGuyGB (2004) Construction Ecology: Nature as a Basis for Green Buildings. Taylor & Francis.
56.
KourmpanisBPapadopoulosAMoustakasK. (2008) Preliminary study for the management of construction and demolition waste. Waste Management & Research26: 267–275.
57.
KraljDMarkičM (2008) Building materials reuse and recycle. WSEAS Transactions on Environment and Development4(5): 409–418.
58.
KrikkeHBlancHVeldeS (2004) Product modularity and the design of closed-loop supply chains. California Management Review46: 23–39.
59.
KrikkeHBloemhof-RuwaardJVan WassenhoveL (2003) Concurrent product and closed-loop supply chain design with an application to refrigerators. International Journal of Production Research41: 3689–3719.
60.
KuehlenAThompsonNSchultmannF (2014) Barriers for deconstruction and reuse/recycling of construction materials in Germany. In: NakajimaSRussellM (eds) Barriers for Deconstruction and Reuse/Recycling of Construction Materials. CIB Publication397.
61.
LaeferDMankeJ (2008) Building reuse assessment for sustainable urban reconstruction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management134: 217–227.
62.
LauKHWangY (2009) Reverse logistics in the electronic industry of China: A case study. Supply Chain Management14: 447–465.
63.
LeighNGPattersonLM (2006) Deconstructing to redevelop: A sustainable alternative to mechanical demolition: The economics of density development finance and pro formas. Journal of the American Planning Association72: 217–225.
64.
LondonK (2007) Construction Supply Chain Economics. Independence, KY, USA: Taylor & Francis.
65.
LovePEIraniZEdwardsDJ (2004) A seamless supply chain management model for construction. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal9: 43–56.
66.
MajorCHSavin-BadenM (2011) Integration of qualitative evidence: Towards construction of academic knowledge in social science and professional fields. Qualitative Research11: 645–663.
67.
ManowongE (2012) Investigating factors influencing construction waste management efforts in developing countries: An experience from Thailand. Waste Management & Research30: 56–71.
68.
MulderEde JongTPFeenstraL (2007) Closed cycle construction: An integrated process for the separation and reuse of C&D waste. Waste Management27: 1408–1415.
69.
NAHB (2001) Report on the feasibility of deconstruction: An investigation of deconstruction activity in four cities. Washington, DC: US Department of Housing and Urban Development.
70.
NakajimaS (2014) Barriers for deconstruction and reuse/recycling of construction materials in Japan. In: NakajimaSRussellM (eds) Barriers for Deconstruction and Reuse/Recycling of Construction Materials. CIB Publication397.
71.
NakajimaSRussellM (2014) Overview: Global barriers for deconstruction and reuse/recycling of construction materials. In: NakajimaSRussellM (eds) Barriers for Deconstruction and Reuse/Recycling of Construction Materials. CIB Publication397.
72.
NordbyASBergeBHakonsenF. (2009) Criteria for salvageability: The reuse of bricks. Building Research & Information37: 55–67.
73.
NunesKRAMahlerCFValleRA (2009) Reverse logistics in the Brazilian construction industry. Journal of Environmental Management90: 3717–3720.
74.
O’BrienWJLondonKVrijhoefR (2004) Construction supply chain modeling: A research review and interdisciplinary research agenda. ICFAI Journal of Operations Management3: 64–84.
75.
PengC-LScorpioDEKibertCJ (1997) Strategies for successful construction and demolition waste recycling operations. Construction Management & Economics15: 49–58.
76.
PulaskiMHewittCHormanM. (2003) Design for deconstruction: Material reuse and constructability. The Pittsburgh Papers: Best of Greenbuild2003: 74–81.
77.
PunSKLiuCLiJ (2005) Salvage material logistics management for building demolition project. In: FwaTF (ed.) LOG 2005 : Proceedings of the 1st international conference on transportation logistics, Singapore, 27–29July. Singapore: National University of Singapore, Dept. of Civil Engineering.
78.
RameezdeenR (2007) Image of the construction industry. In: SextonMKahkonenKLuS-L (eds) Revaluing Construction, A W065 ‘Organization and Management of Construction’ Perspective. CIB Publication313, 76–87.
79.
RaoAJhaKNMisraS (2007) Use of aggregates from recycled construction and demolition waste in concrete. Resources, Conservation and Recycling50: 71–81.
80.
RazazZE (2010) Design for dismantling strategies. Journal of Building Appraisal6: 49–61.
81.
RogersDSTibben-LembkeR (2001) An examination of reverse logistics practices. Journal of Business Logistics22: 129–148.
82.
RoussatNDujetCMéhuJ (2009) Choosing a sustainable demolition waste management strategy using multicriteria decision analysis. Waste Management29: 12–20.
83.
RuffCMDzombakDAHendricksonCT (1996) Owner-contractor relationships on contaminated site remediation projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management122: 348–353.
84.
SaghafiMDTeshniziZAH (2011) Building deconstruction and material recovery in Iran: An analysis of major determinants. Procedia Engineering21: 853–863.
85.
SandelowskiMBarrosoJ (2007) Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
86.
SassiP (2002) Study of current building methods that enable the dismantling of building structures and their classifications according to their ability to be reused, recycled or downcycled. In: Paper presented at the international conference for sustainable building, Oslo, Norway. Available at: http://www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/CIB3043.pdf (accessed 30 August 2013).
87.
SassiP (2004) Designing buildings to close the material resource loop. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Engineering Sustainability157: 163–171.
88.
SassiP (2008) Defining closed-loop material cycle construction. Building Research & Information36: 509–519.
89.
SassiP (2009) Closed loop material cycle construction: Defining and assessing closed loop material cycle construction as a component of a comprehensive approach to sustainable material design in the context of sustainable building. Cardiff University, UK.
90.
SchultmannF (2008) Sustainable deconstruction of buildings. In: YangJBrandonPSSidwellAC (eds) Smart and Sustainable Built Environments. Chichester, GBR: Wiley.
91.
SchultmannFRentzO (2002) Scheduling of deconstruction projects under resource constraints. Construction Management and Economics20: 391–401.
92.
SchultmannFSunkeN (2007a) Energy-oriented deconstruction and recovery planning. Building Research & Information35: 602–615.
93.
SchultmannFSunkeN (2007b) Organisation of reverse logistics tasks in the construction industry. In: BragançaLPinheiroMJalaliS (eds) Portugal SB07: Sustainable Construction, Materials and Practices. Amsterdam, NLD: IOS Press.
94.
SeuringSMüllerM (2008) From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production16: 1699–1710.
95.
ShakantuWMEmuzeFA (2012) Assessing reverse logistics in South African construction. In: TommeleinIDPasquireCL (eds) Proceedings for the 20th annual conference of the international group for lean construction, San Diego, CA, 18–20July. Available at: http://www.iglc20.sdsu.edu/papers/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/67%20P%20181.pdf (accessed 15 May 2015).
96.
ShakantuWMuyaMTookeyJ. (2008) Flow modelling of construction site materials and waste logistics: A case study from Cape Town, South Africa. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management15: 423–439.
97.
ShakantuWMuyaMTookeyJ. (2012) Evaluating truck empty running in construction: A case study from Cape Town, South Africa. Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building8: 41–49.
98.
ShakantuWTookeyJEBowenPA (2003) The hidden cost of transportation of construction materials: an overview. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology1: 103–118.
99.
SheridanSKTownsendTGPriceJL. (2000) Policy options for hazardous-building-component removal before demolition. Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management4: 111–117.
100.
SiewRYBalatbatMCCarmichaelDG (2013) The relationship between sustainability practices and financial performance of construction companies. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment2: 6–27.
101.
SinhaSShankarRTaneerananonP (2010) Modelling and case study of reverse logistics for construction aggregates. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management6: 39–59.
102.
SmithEBooneMWEShamiM (2007) Sustainable approaches to landfill diversion: The global sustainability of deconstruction. In: ClaissePSadeghiPNaikTR. (eds) Proceedings of the international conference: Sustainable construction materials and technologies (SCMT), Coventry, 11–13June. Coventry, UK and Milwaukee, WI: Coventry University and UWM Center for By-Products Utilization.
103.
SrourIChongWKZhangF (2012) Sustainable recycling approach: An understanding of designers’ and contractors’ recycling responsibilities throughout the life cycle of buildings in two US cities. Sustainable Development20: 350–360.
104.
StewardWCKuskaSSB (2004) Structuring research for “design for deconstruction”. In: DECON04 deconstruction and building materials reuse conference, Oakland, CA, 1–3September. Chicago, IL: Building Materials Reuse Association (BMRA). Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.195.573&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed 15 May 2015).
105.
StoreyJBPedersenM (2014) Overcoming the barriers to deconstruction and materials reuse in New Zealand. In: NakajimaSRussellM (eds) Barriers for deconstruction and reuse/recycling of construction materials. CIB Publication397.
106.
TamVWTamC (2006a) A review on the viable technology for construction waste recycling. Resources, Conservation and Recycling47: 209–221.
107.
TamVWYTamCM (2006b) Evaluations of existing waste recycling methods: A Hong Kong study. Building and Environment41: 1649–1660.
108.
TamVWLiJCaiH (2014) System dynamic modeling on construction waste management in Shenzhen, China. Waste Management & Research32: 441–453.
109.
TennantSFernieS (2014) Theory to practice: A typology of supply chain management in construction. International Journal of Construction Management14: 72–87.
110.
ThierryMCSalomonMNunenJv. (1995) Strategic issues in product recovery management. California Management Review37: 114–135.
111.
ThomsenASchultmannFKohlerN (2011) Deconstruction, demolition and destruction. Building Research & Information39: 327–332.
112.
ThormarkC (2000) Including recycling potential in energy use into the life-cycle of buildings. Building Research & Information28: 176–183.
113.
TorracoRJ (2005) Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review4: 356–367.
114.
van DijkSTenpierikMvan den DobbelsteenA (2014) Continuing the building’s cycles: A literature review and analysis of current systems theories in comparison with the theory of cradle to cradle. Resources, Conservation and Recycling82: 21–34.
115.
VaughanV (2013) Possible options for reuse and recycling of end-of-life waste glass from deconstruction projects. University of British Columbia, Report prepared at the request of City of Vancouver in partial fulfillment of UBC Geog 419. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/2429/44459 (accessed 15 May 2015).
116.
WebsterJWatsonRT (2002) Analysing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS quarterly26: xiii–xxiii.
117.
WebsterM (2007) Structural design for adaptability and deconstruction: A strategy for closing the materials loop and increasing building value. In: LyonsR (ed.) New Horizons and Better Practices. Long Beach, California, United States, 1–6.
118.
XanthopoulosAAidonisDVlachosD. (2012) A planning optimisation framework for construction and demolition waste management. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering10: 257–276.
119.
XiongBSkitmoreMXiaB (2015) A critical review of structural equation modeling applications in construction research. Automation in Construction49: 59–70.
120.
YeheyisMHewageKAlamMS. (2013) An overview of construction and demolition waste management in Canada: A lifecycle analysis approach to sustainability. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy15: 81–91.
121.
YiWChanA (2013) Critical review of labor productivity research in construction journals. Journal of Management in Engineering30: 214–225.
