The greenhouse gas and energy balance of different treatment concepts for bio-waste

Abstract

The greenhouse gas (GHG) and energy performance of bio-waste treatment plants been investigated for three characteristic bio-waste treatment concepts: composting; biological drying for the production of biomass fuel fractions; and anaerobic digestion. Compared with other studies about the environmental impacts of bio-waste management, this study focused on the direct comparison of the latest process concepts and state-of-the-art emission control measures. To enable a comparison, the mass balance and products were modelled for all process concepts assuming the same bio-waste amounts and properties. In addition, the value of compost as a soil improver was included in the evaluation, using straw as a reference system. This aspect has rarely been accounted for in other studies. The study is based on data from operational facilities combined with literature data. The results show that all three concepts contribute to a reduction of GHG emissions and show a positive balance for cumulated energy demand. However, in contrast to other studies, the advantage of anaerobic digestion compared with composting is smaller as a result of accounting for the soil improving properties of compost. Still, anaerobic digestion is the environmentally superior solution. The results are intended to inform decision makers about the relevant aspects of bio-waste treatment regarding the environmental impacts of different bio-waste management strategies.

Keywords

Greenhouse gas balance energy balance cumulated energy demand bio-waste composting anaerobic digestion

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

BGK (Bundesgütegemeinschaft Kompost E.V.) (ed.) (2010) [Evaluation of the quality assured compost analysis from 2009]. Available at: http://www.kompost.de/fileadmin/docs/guetesicherung/kompost_D_2009.pdf (accessed 25 July 2012).

BIFA (BIFA Umweltinstitut GmbH) (ed.) (2010) [Ecoefficient utilization of bio-waste and green waste in Bavaria], bifa-Text 47. Augsburg: BIFA Umweltinstitut GmbH.

Blengini

(2008) Using LCA to evaluate impacts and resources conservation potential of composting: A case study of the Asti District in Italy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 52: 1373–1381.

Boldrin

Hartling

Laugen

Christensen

(2010) Environmental inventory modelling of the use of compost and peat in growth media preparation. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 54: 1250–1260.

Christensen

Gentil

Boldrin

Larsen

Weidemar

Hauschild

(2009) C balance, carbon dioxide emissions and global warming potentials in LCA-modelling of waste management systems. Waste Management & Research 27: 707–715.

Cuhls

Mähl

Berkau

Clemens

(2008) [Determination of the emissions from the treament of bio-waste]. Abschlussbericht, UFOPlan Vorhaben, Förderkennzeichen 206: 326.

DIN EN ISO 14040 (2006) Environmental management – life cycle assessment – principles and framework.

DIN EN ISO 14044 (2006) Environmental management – life cycle assessment – requirements and guidelines.

European Commission (ed.) (2000) Waste Incineration Directive, Directive 2000/76/EC.

10.

European Commission (ed.) (2008) Waste Framework Directive, Directive 2008/98/EC.

11.

European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability (ed.) (2011) Supporting environmentally sound decisions for bio-waste management - a practical guide to life cycle thinking (LCT) and life cycle assessment (LCA). Available at: http://lct.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pdf-directory/D4A-Guidance-on-LCT-LCA-applied-to-BIO-WASTE-Management-Final-ONLINE.pdf (accessed 25 July 2013).

12.

European Environment Agency (ed.) (2011) Waste opportunities – past and future climate benefits from better municipal waste management in Europe. EEA Report, No 3/2011, pp. 3–8. Copenhagen: EEA.

13.

Forster

Ramaswamy

Artaxo

Berntsen

Betts

Fahey

. (2007) Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of P. Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

14.

Fuchs

Schleiss

(2009) [Ecological Assessment of Organic Matter]. Bern: Research Institute of Organic Agriculture on behalf of the Swiss Federal Department of Environment.

15.

GEMIS 4.6 (2012) Life Cycle Inventory Database. Available at: http://www.iinas.org/gemis-de.html (accessed 17 August 2012).

16.

Gentil

Clavreul

Christensen

(2009) Global warming factor of municipal solid waste management in Europe. Waste Management & Research 27: 850–860.

17.

Güereca

Gassó

Baldasano

Jiménez-Guerrero

(2006) Life cycle assessment of two bio-waste management systems for Barcelona, Spain. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 49: 32–48.

18.

Hermann

Debeer

De Wilde

Blok

Patel

(2011) To compost or not to compost: Carbon and energy footprints of biodegradable materials’ waste treatment. Polymer Degradation and Stability 96: 1159–1171.

19.

JEC E3 database (2008) Life-cycle assessment tool. Available at: http://www.e3database.com/ (accessed 17 August 2012).

20.

Khoo

Lim

Tan

RBH

(2010) Food waste conversion options in Singapore: Environmental impacts based on an LCA perspective. Science of The Total Environment 408: 1367–1373.

21.

Knappe

Vogt

Lazar

Höke

(2012) [Optimization of the Utilization of Organic Wastes]. Dessau-Roßlau: Umweltbundesamt.

22.

Kranert

Cord-Landwehr

(2010) [Introduction to Waste Management]. Wiesbaden: Vieweg+Teubner Verlag.

23.

Lampert

Tesar

Thaler

(2011) [Climatic relevance and energy efficiency of the recovery of energy and materials from biodegradable waste]. Available at: http://www.lebensministerium.at/umwelt/abfall-ressourcen/behandlung-verwertung/behandlung-biotechnisch/kompost_studien.html (accessed 25 July 2012).

24.

Vogt

Knappe

Giegrich

Detzel

(2002) [LCA of Biowaste Treatment – Investigations on the Environmental Impact of Bio-waste Treatment Technologies]. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.

25.

Springer

(2010) [Energy and CO₂-balance of composting considering the substitution potential of compost]. Müll und Abfall 8/2010: 386–396.

26.

UBA (Umweltbundesamt) (ed.) (2010a) [Emission balance of renewable energy carriers – emission prevention in the year 2009]. Available at: http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/uba-info-medien/3761.html (accessed 25 July 2012).

27.

UBA (Umweltbundesamt) (ed.) (2010b) [Climate impact of selected recycling processes in Austria]. Available at: http://www.umwelttechnik.at/fileadmin/content/Downloads/UBA_Klimarelevanz_ausgewaehlter_Recycling-Prozesse_in_OEsterreich_01.pdf (accessed 29 May 2013).