Multi-stakeholder decision analysis and comparative risk assessment for reuse–recycle oriented e-waste management strategies: a game theoretic approach

Abstract

This article deals with assessment of the potential health risk posed by carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic substances, namely lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), copper, chromium (CrVI), zinc, nickel and mercury, present in e-waste. A multi-objective, multi-stakeholder approach based on strategic game theory model has been developed considering cost, as well as human health risk. The trade-off due to cost difference between a hazardous substances-free (HSF) and a hazardous substance (HS)-containing desktop computer, and the risk posed by them at the time of disposal, has been analyzed. The cancer risk due to dust inhalation for workers at a recycling site in Bangalore for Pb, Cr(VI) and Cd was found to be 4, 33 and 101 in 1 million respectively. Pb and Cr(VI) result in a very high risk owing to dust ingestion at slums near the recycling site—175 and 81 in 1 million for children, and 24 and 11 in 1 million for adults respectively. The concentration of Pb at a battery workshop in Mayapuri, Delhi (hazard quotient = 3.178) was found to pose adverse health hazards. The government may impose an appropriate penalty on the land disposal of computer waste and/or may give an incentive to manufacturer for producing HSF computers through, for example, relaxing taxes, but there should be no such incentive for manufacturing HS-containing computers.

Keywords

E-waste hazardous substances health risk game theory advance recovery fee multi-stakeholder analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akhter

Madany

(1993). Heavy metals in street and house dust in Bahrain. Water, Air & Soil Pollution 66: 111–119.

Baghurst

McMichael

Wigg

Vimpani

Robertson

Roberts

(1992) Environmental exposure to lead and children’s intelligence at the age of seven years: The Port Pirie Cohort Study. New England Journal of Medicine 327: 1279–1284.

Barari

Agarwal

Zhang

Mahanty

Tiwari

(2012) A decision framework for the analysis of green supply chain contracts: An evolutionary game approach, Expert Systems with Applications 39: 2965–2976.

Berkhout

Hertin

(2004) De-materialising and re-materialising: digital technologies and the environment. Futures 36: 903–920.

Brigden

Labunska

Santillo

Allsopp

(2005). Recycling of electronic wastes in China and India: Workplace and environmental contamination. Technical Note 09/2005 (Section 1). Exeter: Greenpeace International.

Calabrese

Kostecki

Gilbert

(1987) How much dirt do children eat? An emerging environmental health question. Toxicology 1: 229–241.

Casey

HGG

Seager

Theis

Powers

(2007) A game theory framework for cooperative management of refillable and disposable bottle lifecycles. Journal of Cleaner Production 15: 1618–1627.

Chatterjee

Kumar

(2009) Effective electronic waste management and recycling process involving formal and non-formal sectors. International Journal of Physical Sciences 4: 893–905.

Chung

Murakami-Suzuki

Kojima

(2009) Application of EPR to recycling policies in Japan, Korea and Taiwan. In: Hotta

Hayashi

Bengtsson

Mori

(eds) Extended Producer Responsibility Policy in East Asia – in Consideration of International Resource Circulation. Hayama: IGES.

10.

Danish Environmental Protection Agency (2003) Human bioaccessibility of heavy metals and pahs from soil. Available at: http://www.miljoindflydelse.dk/udgiv/Publications/2003/87–7972–877–4/pdf/87–7972–878–2.pdf (accessed on 4 August 2012).

11.

Davis

Smith

(2003) Corporate Strategies for Electronics Recycling: a tale of two systems. Publication of the Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition and the Computer Take Back Campaign!. doi: 10.1109/EMEIT.2011.6023405.

12.

E-waste (Management and Handling) Rules India (2011) Ministry of Environment and Forests notification. Available at: http://moef.nic.in/downloads/rules-and-regulations/1035e_eng.pdf (accessed 3 May 2012).

13.

EMPA (2004) E-waste pilot study Delhi: Knowledge partnerships with developing and transition countries. St. Gallen: EMPA. Available at: http://www.ewaste.ch/ (accessed June 2006).

14.

Environment, Protection and Heritage Council (EPHC) (2010) National Waste Report 2010, Commonwealth of Australia, Parkes, ACT, Australia: Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities. Available at: http://www.environment.gov.au/wastepolicy/publications/national-waste-report.html (accessed June 2012).

15.

FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the Nations) and WHO (World Health Organization) (1972) Evaluation of Certain Food Additives and Contaminants. Mercury, Lead and Cadmium. 16th report of the joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Geneva: World Health Organization.

16.

Gao

Jin

(2011) Pricing strategies with recycled products in reverse supply chain. In: 18th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IE&EM), IEEE, Changchun, P.R China, vol. 3, pp. 1478–1482. New York, NY, USA: IEEE.

17.

Greenpeace (2008) Take Back Blues: An Assessment of E-waste Take Back in India. Amsterdam: Greenpeace. Available at: http://ewasteguide.info/files/take-back-blues_2008_Greenpeace.pdf (accessed 23 March 2012)

18.

Gupta

(1996) Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation (MCC). Electronics Industry Environmental Roadmap. Austin, TX: MCC. Available at: http://ewasteguide.info/node/220 (accessed on 25 June 2012).

19.

Agusa

Ramu

NPC

Murata

Bulbule

(2009) Contamination by trace elements at e-waste recycling sites in Bangalore, India. Chemosphere 76: 9–15.

20.

Hawley

(1985) Assessment of health risk from exposure to contaminated soil. Risk Analysis 5: 289–302.

21.

HERAG Fact Sheet (2007) Occupational inhalation exposure and systemic inhalation absorption. London, UK: HERAG.

22.

Heimbuch

(2008) E-waste a growing problem in UK landfills. Available at: http://www.treehugger.com/gadgets/e-waste-a-growing-problem-in-uk-landfills.html (accessed 8 December 2012).

23.

Kahhat

Kim

Allenby

Williams

Zhang

(2008) Exploring e-waste management systems in the United States. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 52: 955–964.

24.

Kowsar

Hashia

Khan

(2010) E-Waste and Its Health Impacts, Global Journal of Human Social Science 10: 88.

25.

Lincoln

Ogunseitan

Saphores

J-DM

Schoenung

Nixon

Shapiro

A A

(2005) Environmentally benign materials for electronics: a review of current developments and emerging technologies. In: Proceedings of 10th International Symposium on Advanced Packaging Materials: Processes, Properties and Interfaces, Irvine, CA, USA, 16-18 March 2005, pp. 139–143. New York, NY, USA: IEEE.

26.

Liu

(2011) The construction of the green supply system based on game theory. International Conference on Social Science and Humanity, IPEDR, Singapore 5: V1 341–346.

27.

MAIT-GTZ (2007) E-waste inventorisation in India. Available at: http://www.e-wasteproject.org/docs/del_amitjain.pdf (accessed 27 June 2013).

28.

Menon

(2004) Dataquest: Top Stories: Lethal Waste, 2004. Available at: http://www.dqindia.com/content/top_stories/2004/104102001.asp (accessed 3 May 2012).

29.

Milanez

Buhrs

(2009) Extended producer responsibility in Brazil: the case of tyre waste. Journal of Cleaner Production 17: 608–615.

30.

Monika Kishore

(2010) E-waste Management: As a challenge to Public Health in India. International Journal of Community Medicine 35: 382-385. doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.69251.

31.

Murgueytio

Evans

Sterling

Serrano

Roberts

(1998) Behaviors and blood lead levels of children in a lead-mining area and a comparison community. Journal of Environmental Health 60: 14–20.

32.

Neumann

Morgenstern

(1944). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

33.

Osborne

Rubinstein

(1994) A Course in Game Theory. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

34.

Puckett

Westervelt

Gutierrez

Takamiya

(2005) The digital dump. Exporting re-use and abuse to Africa. Report from the Basel Action Network. Seattle, WA: Basel Action Network.

35.

Ravi

(2012) Evaluating overall quality of recycling of e-waste from end-of-life computers. Journal of Cleaner Production 20: 145–151.

36.

Sinha-Khetriwal

Kreaeuchi

Widmer

(2009) Producer responsibility for e-waste management: Key issues for consideration-Learning from Swiss experience. Journal of Environmental Management 90: 153–165.

37.

Sinha-Khetriwal

Kraeuchi

Schwaninger

(2005) A comparison of electronic waste recycling in Switzerland and in India. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25: 492–504.

38.

State of Environment Report for Delhi (2010) Department of Environment and ForestsGovernment of NCT of Delhi. Available at: www.environment.delhigovt.nic.in (accessed 14 May 2013).

39.

Tsydenova

Bengtsson

(2011) Chemical hazards associated with treatment of waste electrical and electronic equipment. Waste Management 31: 45-58.

40.

USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (1993) Reference dose: Description and use in health risk assessments, Background Document 1A. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/iris/rfd.htm (accessed 22 March 2012).

41.

USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (1999) Short Sheet. IEUBK model bioavailability variable. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/superfund/health/contaminants/lead/products/sspbbioc.pdf (accessed 23 June 2012).

42.

USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (1998) Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). Available at: http://www.epa.gov/iris/ (accessed 23 June 2012).

43.

USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2007) Management of electronic waste in the United States: Approach two. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/ecycling/manage.htm (accessed 2 April 2013).

44.

Wang

Sun

(2010) A development of manufacturer-supplier game model for hazardous substances risk control in electronics industry. In: IEEE 17th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IE&EM), Xiamen, P.R China, 29 - 31 October 2010. pp. 615–619. New York, NY, USA: IEEE.

45.

WHO (World Health Organization) (1987) Air Quality Guidelines. Copenhagen: WHO.

46.

WHO (World Health Organization) (1991) Inorganic Mercury Environmental Health Criteria 118. Geneva: WHO.

47.

Xin-jun

Qing-li

(2008) Benefit analysis of closed-loop supply chain under remanufacturing condition. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering 44: 170–174.

48.

Zhang

Jin

(2011) The pricing model construction of reverse supply chain based on game theory. In: International Conference on Electronic and Mechanical Engineering and Information Technology (EMEIT), Harbin, Heilongjiang, China, 12-14 August, 2011, vol. 4, pp. 1880–1883. New York, NY, USA: IEEE.