An assessment of recent technical advances on pretreatment processes and its effects on enzymatic hydrolysis as the main steps of a proposed citrus processing waste (CPW) biorefinery is presented. Engineering challenges and relevant gaps in scientific and technical information for reliable design, modeling and scale up of a CPW biorefinery are also discussed. Some integrated physico-chemical pretreatments are proposed for testing for CPW, including high speed knife-grinding and simultaneous caustic addition. These new proposed processes and the effect of parameters such as particle size, surface area and morphology, pore volume and chemical composition of the diverse fractions resulting from pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis need to be evaluated and compared for pretreated and untreated samples of grapefruit processing waste. This assessment suggests the potential for filling the data gaps, and preliminary results demonstrate that the reduction of particle size and the increased surface area for the CPW will result in higher reaction rates and monosaccharide yields for the pretreated waste material.
ARS (Agricultural Research Service) (eds) (1962). Chemistry and Technology of Citrus, Citrus Products and Byproducts. Agriculture Handbook 98. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture.
2.
AntwerpenFJ (1941) Utilization of citrus wastes. Industrial and Engineering ChemistryNovember: 1422–1427.
3.
BozellJJMoensLElliottDCWangY (2000) Production of levulinic acid and use as a platform chemical for derived products. Resources Conservation and Recycling28: 227–239.
4.
BraddockRJ (1999) Handbook of Citrus By-products and Processing Technology. New York: John Wiley.
5.
BraddockRJMillerWM (2001) Volatile organic compounds from citrus feed mill emissions. Journal of Food Process Engineering24: pp 1–15.
6.
BuffDA (1997) VOC emissions from citrus processing plants. Transactions of the Citrus Engineering Conference43: 65–79.
7.
DasariRKBersonRE (2007) The effect of particle size on hydrolysis reaction rates and rheological properties in cellulosic slurries. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology136–140: 289–299.
8.
Fernandez-LópezJFernandez-GinesJMAleson-CarbonellLSendraESayas-BarberaEPerez-AlvarezJA (2004) Application of functional citrus by-products to meat products. Trends in Food Science & Technology15: 176–185.
9.
FurchtPWSillaH (1990) Comparison of simultaneous wet milling and enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose in ball mill and attrition mill reactors. Biotechnology and Bioengineering35: 630–645.
10.
GoodrichRMBraddockRJ (2006) Major by-products of the Florida citrus processing industry. Document FSHN05–22, Series of the Food Science and Human Nutrition Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Original publication date October 2004. Revised February2006. Available at: http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu (accessed 3 June 2008).
11.
GongCSCaoNJDuJTsaoGT (1999) Ethanol production from renewable resources. Advances in Biochemical Engineering Biotechnology65: 234–235.
12.
GrohmannK (2007) Final Technical Report, Project Title: Citrus Waste Biomass Program. USDA Agricultural Research Service CRADA 58–3K95–4–1053. Available at: www.osti.gov/bridge/servlets/purl/898345–9P4Slw/898345.pdf (accessed 12 January 2012).
13.
GrohmannKBaldwinEA (1992) Fractionation and pretreatment of orange peel by dilute acid hydrolysis. Biotechnology Letters14: 1169–1174.
14.
GrohmannKBothastRJ (1994) Pectin rich residues generated by processing of citrus fruits, apples and sugar beets. In: HimmelMEBakerJOOverendRP (eds) Enzymatic Conversion of Biomass for Fuel Production, ACS Symp. Ser. No. 566. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, pp. 372–390.
15.
GrohmannKBaldwinEABusligBS (1994) Production of ethanol from enzymatically hydrolyzed orange peel by the yeastSaccharomyces cerevisiae. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology45/46: 315–327.
16.
GrohmannKCameronRGBusligBS (1995) Fractionation and pretreatment of orange peel by dilute acid hydrolysis. Bioresource Technology54: 129–141.
JørgensenHKristensenJBFelbyC (2007) Enzymatic conversion of lignocellulose into fermentable sugars: challenges and opportunities. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining1: 119–134.
19.
LohrasbiMPourbafraniMNiklassonCTaherzadehMJ (2010) Process design and economic analysis of a citrus waste biorefinery with biofuels and limonene as products, Bioresource Technology101: 7382–7388.
20.
MarınFRSoler-RivasCBenavente-GarcıaOCastilloJPerez-AlvarezJA (2007) By-products from different citrus processes as a source of customized functional fibers. Food Chemistry100: 736–741.
NREL (National Renewable Energy Laboratory). (eds) (2012). Glossary of biomass terms. Available at: http://www.nrel.gov/biomass/glossary.html (accessed 12 January 2012).
24.
NeilsonMJKelseyRGShafizadheF (1982) Enhancement of enzymatic hydrolysis by simultaneous attrition of cellulosic substrates. Biotechnology and Bioengineering Symposium24: 293–304.
PourbafraniM (2010). Citrus waste biorefinery: process development, simulation and economic analysis. PhD Thesis, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden,.
27.
PourbafraniMForgácsGHorváthISNiklassonCTaherzadehMJ (2010). Production of biofuels, limonene and pectin from citrus wastes. Bioresource Technology101: 4246–4250.
28.
Serrano-RuizJCWestRMDumesicA (2010) Catalytic conversion of renewable biomass resources to fuels and chemicals. Annual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering1: 79–100.
29.
StewartDAWidmerWWGrohmannKWilkinsMR (2006). Ethanol production from citrus processing wastes. US Patent Application Publication No.US/2006/0177916-A1.
30.
TingSVDeszyckEJ (1961) The carbohydrates in the peel of oranges and grapefruit. Journal of Food Science26: 146–152.
31.
UenoHTanakaMHosinoMSasakiMGotaM (2008) Extraction of valuable compounds from the flavedo of Citrus junos using subcritical water. Separation and Purification Technology62: 513–516.
32.
USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (eds) (1990). Clean air act amendment provisions related to specific stationary source categories. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/caaa/gen/stasor.pdf (accessed 23 February 2012).
33.
USEPA (eds) (2004) 40 CFR Part 52, approval and promulgation of implementation plans: Florida: citrus juice processing. Federal Register69: 4459–4463.
34.
VerverisCGeorghiouKDanielidisDHatzinikolaouDGSantasPSantasRCorletiV (2007) Cellulose, hemicelluloses, lignin and ash content of some organic materials and their suitability for use as paper pulp supplements. Bioresource Technology98: 296–301.
35.
WilkinsMRWidmerWWGrohmannKCameronRG (2007) Hydrolysis of grapefruit peel waste with cellulase and pectinase enzymes. Bioresource Technology98: 1596–1601.
36.
WingJM (2003) Citrus Feedstuffs for Dairy Cattle, Document BUL 829, Series of the Animal Science Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Original publication date November 1982. Reviewed June2003. Available at: http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu; http://ufdc.ufl.edu/UF00027465/00001 (accessed 12 December 2012).
37.
ZhouWWidmerWWGrohmannK (2007) Economic analysis of ethanol production from citrus peel waste. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society120: 310–315.
