Healthcare waste should be managed carefully because of infected, pathological, etc. content especially in developing countries. Applied management systems must be the most appropriate solution from a technical, environmental, economic and social point of view. The main objective of this study was to analyse the current status of healthcare waste management in Turkey, and to investigate the most appropriate treatment/disposal option by using different decision-making techniques. For this purpose, five different healthcare waste treatment/disposal alternatives including incineration, microwaving, on-site sterilization, off-site sterilization and landfill were evaluated according to two multi-criteria decision-making techniques: analytic network process (ANP) and ELECTRE. In this context, benefits, costs and risks for the alternatives were taken into consideration. Furthermore, the prioritization and ranking of the alternatives were determined and compared for both methods. According to the comparisons, the off-site sterilization technique was found to be the most appropriate solution in both cases.
AbdullaFAbu QdaisHRabiA (2008) Site investigation on medical waste management practices in northern Jordan. Waste Management28: 450–458.
2.
AlagözAKocasoyG (2007) Treatment and disposal alternatives for health-care waste in developing countries – a case study in Istanbul, Turkey. Waste Management and Research25: 83–89.
3.
AlagözAKocasoyG (2008) Determination of the best appropriate management methods for the health-care wastes in Istanbul. Waste Management28: 1227–1235.
4.
AltınSAltinAElevliB. (2003) Determination of hospital waste composition and disposal methods: a case study. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies12(2): 251–255.
5.
BlenkharnJI (2006) A backward step: landfill disposal of clinical waste. Journal of Hospital Infection63: 105–112.
6.
BirpınarMEBilgiliMSErdoganT (2009) Medical waste management in Turkey: A case study of İstanbul. Waste Management29: 445–448.
7.
BrentACRogersDECRamabitsa-SiimaneTSM. (2007) Application of the analytical hierarchy process to establish health care waste management systems that minimize infection risks in developing countries. European Journal of Operational Research181: 403–424.
8.
ChengYWLiKCSungFC (2010) Medical waste generation in selected clinical facilities in Taiwan. Waste Management30: 1690–1695.
9.
DHV Consultant (2010) Appropriate Technologies for Healthcare Waste Management. Amersfoort, the Netherlands: DHN Consultant, Technical Report, 50 p.
10.
DiazLFSavageGM (2003) Risks and Costs Associated with the Management of Infectious Wastes. Study Prepared for WHO/WPRO, Manila, Philippines.
11.
DiazLFSavageGMEggerthLL (2005) Alternatives for the treatment and disposal of healthcare wastes in developing countries. Waste Management25: 626–637.
12.
DursunMKarsakEEKaradayiMA (2011) A fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making framework for evaluating health-care waste disposal alternatives. Expert Systems with Applications38: 11453–11462.
13.
EdlichRFBorelLJensenHG. (2006) Revolutionary advances in medical waste management: the Sanitec® system. Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants16(1): 1–10.
14.
El-SalamMMA (2010) Hospital waste management in El-Beheira Governorate, Egypt. Journal of Environmental Management91: 618–629.
15.
FigueiraJGrecoSEhrgottM (2005) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. Boston, MA, USA: Springer, 1045 pp.
16.
GraikosAVoudriasEPapazachariouA. (2010) Composition and production rate of medical waste from a small producer in Greece. Waste Management30: 1683–1689.
17.
HadarJTiroshTGrafsteinO. (1997) Autoclave emissions-hazardous or not. Journal of American Biological Safety Association2(3): 44–51.
18.
HoCC (2011) Optimal evaluation of infectious medical waste disposal companies using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Waste Management31: 1553–1559.
19.
HokkanenJSalminenP (1997) Choosing a solid waste management system using multicriteria decision analysis. European Journal of Operational Research98: 19–36.
20.
HossainSSanthanamANorulainiNA. (2011) Clinical solid waste management practices and its impact on human health and environment – A review. Waste Management31: 754–766.
21.
HsuPWuCLiY (2008) Selection of infectious medical waste disposal firms by using the analytic hierarchy process and sensitivity analysis. Waste Management28: 1386–1394.
JangYLeeCYoonO. (2006) Medical waste management in Korea. Journal of Environmental Management80: 107–115.
25.
KaragiannidisAPapageorgiouAPerkoulidisG. (2010) A multi- criteria assessment of scenarios on thermal processing of infectious hospital wastes: A case study for Central Macedonia. Waste Management30: 251–262.
26.
KaramouzMZahraieBKerachianR. (2007) Developing a master plan for hospital solid waste management: A case study. Waste Management27: 626–638.
27.
KoneCABukeT (2007) An analytical network process (ANP) evaluation of alternative fuels for electricity generation in Turkey. Energy Policy35: 5220–5228.
28.
MalkoçS (2004) Chemical and Microbiological Investigation of Gas Emissions and Fly/Bottom Ashes from Medical Waste Incinerator, Performing Toxicity and Mutagenicity Tests. PhD Thesis, Anadolu University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, 146 pp (original in Turkish).
29.
MatoRRAMKassengaGR (1997) A study on problems of management of medical solid wastes in Dar es Salaam and their remedial measures. Resources, Conservation and Recycling21: 1–16.
30.
PromentillaMAFuruichiTIshiiK. (2006) Evaluation of remedial countermeasures using the analytic network process. Waste Management26(12): 1410–1421
31.
RogersMBruenM (2000) Using ELECTRE III to choose route for Dublin Port Motorway. Journal of Transportation Engineering126(4): 313–323.
32.
RoyB (1991) The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. Theory and Decisions31(1): 49–73.
33.
SaatyT (2001) The Analytic Network Process: Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback. Pittsburgh, PA, USA: RWS Publications.
34.
ŞamatH (2006) Incineration of healthcare wastes. Program on Medical Waste Management and Training of Trainers, 1–2November, Ankara/Turkey (original in Turkish). Ankara, Turkey: Turkish Ministry of Environment and Forestry.
35.
TaghipourHMosaferiM (2009) Characterization of medical waste from hospitals in Tabriz, Iran. Science of the Total Environment407: 1527–1535.
36.
TakedaE (2001) A method for multiple pseudo-criteria decision problems. Computer Operational Research28: 1427–1439.
37.
TamCMTongTKLLauCT (2003) ELECTRE III in evaluating performance of construction plants: case study on concrete vibrators. Construction Innovation3: 45–61.
38.
TranTLKnightGCO’NeillVR. (2004) Integrated environmental assessment of the Mid-Atlantic region with analytical network process. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment94: 263–277.
39.
Turkish Ministry of Environment and Forestry (2005) Turkish Medical Waste Control Regulation, Official Gazette No: 25883. Ankara, Turkey: Turkish Ministry of Environment and Forestry.
40.
Turkish Ministry of Environment and Forestry (2010a) Status Report related with Healthcare Wastes. Ankara, Turkey: Turkish Ministry of Environment and Forestry.
41.
Turkish Ministry of Environment and Forestry (2010b) Regulation on the Storage of Wastes, Official Gazette No. 27533. Ankara, Turkey: Turkish Ministry of Environment and Forestry.
42.
UlutaşB (2005) Determination of the appropriate energy policy for Turkey. Energy30(7): 1146–1161.
ZakJ (2005) The comparison of multiobjective ranking methods applied to solve the mass transit systems’ decision problems. e-Proceedings of the 16th Mini - EURO Conference and 10th Meeting of EWGT, Poznan, 13–16 September, pp. 184–193.
