The primary goal of waste regulations is to protect human health and the environment. This requires the removal from the material cycle of those materials that cannot be processed without harm. Policies to promote recycling hold a risk that pollutants are dispersed. Materials have an environmental impact during their entire life cycle from extraction through production, consumption and recycling to disposal. Essentially there are only two routes for pollutants that cannot be rendered harmless: storage in sinks or dispersion into the environment. Many sinks do not contain substances absolutely, but result in slow dispersion. Dispersion leads to exposure and impact to human health and the environment. It is therefore important to assess the impact of the release to the environment. Based on various sources this paper discusses important material flows and their potential impact. This is compared with the intentions and achievements of European environmental and resource policy. The polluter pays principle is being implemented in Europe, but lags behind implementation of waste management regulations. As long as producers are allowed to add hazardous substances to their products and don’t take their products back, it is in society’s best interest to carefully consider whether recycling or storage in a sink is the better solution. This requires further development of life-cycle assessment tools and harmonization of regulations. In many cases the sink is unavoidable. Landfills as sinks will be needed in the future. Fail-safe design and construction as well as sustainable management of landfills must be further developed.
AdriaanseABringezuSHammondA. (1997) Resource Flows: the Material Basis of Industrial Economies. Washington DC, USA: World Resources Institute. Available at: http://pdf.wri.org/resourceflows_bw.pdf (accessed March 2012).
BognerJAbdelrafie AhmedMDiazC. (2007) Waste management, In Climate Change 2007: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds MetzBDavidsonORBoschPR.). Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BringezuSSchützH (2001) Total Material Requirement of the European Union, Technical report No. 55, Copenhagen, Denmark: European Environment Agency.
5.
BrunnerPH (2004) Materials flow analysis and the ultimate sink. Journal of Industrial Ecology8(3): 4–7.
6.
BrunnerPHTjellJC (2012) Do we need sinks?Waste Management and Research30(1): 1–2.
7.
CEC (1999) Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste. Official Journal of the European Communities.
8.
CEC (2003) Council Decision 2003/33/EG of 19 December 2002 establishing criteria for the acceptance of waste at landfills pursuant to Article 16 and Annex II of Directive 1999/31/EC on the landfill of waste. Official Journal of the European Communities.
9.
CEC (2004) Directive 2004/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage. Official Journal of the European Communities.
10.
CEC (2005) Taking sustainable use of resources forward: A Thematic Strategy on the prevention and recycling of waste. Communication from the commission to the council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2005) 666 final. Official Journal of the European Communities.
11.
CEC (2006) Directive 2006/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the management of waste from extractive industries and amending Directive 2004/35/EC, L102/15, 11.04.2008. Official Journal of the European Communities.
12.
CEC (2008) Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives), L312/3-30, 22.11.2008. Official Journal of the European Communities.
DiamondJ (2005) Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. London, UK: Penguin Books.
15.
DöberlGHuberRBrunnerPH (2001) Final storage quality as a necessary goal for waste management. In Proceedings of the ISWA World Congress 2001. Stavanger, Norway.
16.
Eurostat (2001) Economy-wide Material Flow Accounts and Derived Indicators. A Methodological Guide. Luxembourg: Eurostat, European Commission, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
17.
Eurostat (2006) Recovery and Disposal of Municipal Waste. Luxembourg: European Statistical Office. Available at: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu (accessed March 2012).
18.
Eurostat (2007) Economy-wide Material Flow Accounting. A Compilation Guide. Luxembourg: European Statistical Office.
19.
Eurostat (2009) Economy-wide Material Flow Accounts. Compilation Guidelines for Reporting to the 2009 Eurostat Questionnaire (Version 01 – June 2009). Luxembourg: European Statistical Office.
IPCC (2001) Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (HoughtonJTDingYGriggsDJ. (eds)), 881pp. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://www.grida.no/publications/other/ipcc_tar/ (accessed March 2012).
22.
IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. In: Fourth Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC Plenary XXVII, Valencia, Spain, 12–17November2007.
23.
KrausmannFFischer-KowalskiMSchaffartzikA. (2011) Trends and Developments of the Use of Natural Resources in the European Union. Social Ecology Working Paper 123, Vienna, Austria: Institute of Social Ecology, Alpen-Adria Universität.
24.
LagerkvistA (2008) Waste generation – Not as it appears. Teaching material for the waste management course of Luleå Technical University.
25.
MatthewsEAmannCBringezS. (2000) The weight of nations: material outflows from industrial economies. Washington DC, USA: World Resources Institute. Available at: http://www.wri.org/publication/weight-of-nations (accessed March 2012).
26.
MathlenerRAHeimovaaraTOonkH. (2006) Opening the Black Box: Process-Based Design Criteria to Eliminate Aftercare of Landfills. Den Bosch, Netherlands: Dutch Sustainable Landfill Foundation. Available at: http://www.sustainablelandfilling.com (accessed March 2012).
27.
Miljøstyrelsen (2003) Development of Acceptance Criteria for Landfilling. Documentation of the modelling and scenario calculations carried out by DHI and ECN in support of the development of acceptance criteria for landfilling within the TAC Subcommittee on the Landfill Directive. Hørsholm, Denmark: DHI.
28.
MudgalSFischer-KowalskiMKrausmannF. (2011) Preparatory Study for the Review of the Thematic Strategy on the Sustainable Use of Natural Resources. Final report for the European Commission (DG ENV).
29.
OECD (2008a) Measuring Material Flows and Resource Productivity. Volume I. The OECD Guide. Paris, France: OECD.
30.
OECD (2008b) Measuring Material Flows and Resource Productivity. Volume II. The Accounting Framework. Paris, France: OECD.
31.
ScharffHvan ZomerenAvan der SlootHA (2011) Landfill sustainability and aftercare completion criteria. Waste Management and Research29(1): 30–40.
32.
SteketeeJDaalL (2005) Inventarisatie en analyse bestaande werken met AVI-bodemas [in Dutch]. Report R001-4363703JJS-pws-V01-NL. Deventer, Nederland: Tauw.
33.
SOeS (2009) Materials and France’s economy: Material Flow Accounting for Sustainable Resource Management. La Défense, France: Service de l’observation et des statistiques.
34.
UNEP (2011) Decoupling Natural Resource Use and Environmental Impacts from Economic Growth. A Report of the Working Group on Decoupling to the International Resource Panel. (Fischer-KowalskiMSwillingMvon WeizsäckerEU. (eds)). Paris, France: United Nations Environment Programme Division of Technology Industry and Economics.
