This paper investigates the concept of extended producer responsibility (EPR) from an economic point of view. Particular importance will be placed on the concept of ‘economic feasibility’ of an EPR policy, which should guide decision-making in this context. Moreover, the importance of the core EPR principle of ‘integrating signals throughout the product chain’ into the incentive structure will be demonstrated with experiences from Germany. These examples refer to sales packaging consumption, refillable drinks packages and waste electrical and electronic equipment collection. As a general conclusion, the interaction between economic principles and technological development needs to be observed carefully when designing incentive-compatible EPR policies.
Atasu A., Van Wassenhove L. and Sarvary M. ( 2009) Efficient take-back legislation. Production and Operations Management18(3): 243-258.
2.
Baumol W. and Oates W. ( 1988) The Theory of Environmental Policy, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Calcott P. and Walls M. ( 2005) Waste, recycling, and ‘Design for Environment’: Roles for markets and policy instruments. Resource and Energy Economics27: 287-305.
4.
Gerrard J. and Kandlikar M. ( 2007) Is European end-of-life vehicle legislation living up to its expectations? Assessing the impact of the ELV directive on ‘green’ innovation and vehicle recovery. Journal of Cleaner Production15: 17-27. Retrieved from http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jclepro (accessed June 2011).
5.
Janz A. and Bilitewski B. ( 2009) WEEE in and outside Europe - hazards, challenges and limits . In: Lechner P (ed.) Prosperity Waste and Waste Resources. Proceedings of the 3rd BOKU Waste Conference, BOKU-University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna, 113-122.
6.
Nahman A. ( 2010) Extended producer responsibility for packaging waste in South Africa: Current approaches and lessons learned. Resources, Conservation and Recycling54: 155-162.
7.
Nakajima N. and Vanderburg W. ( 2006) A description and analysis of the German packaging take-back system. Bulletin of Science Technology & Society26(6): 510-517. Retrieved from http://bst.sagepub.com/content/26/6/510 (accessed June 2011 ).
8.
Oecd (2001) Extended producer responsibility: a guidance manual for governments. Paris : OECD.
9.
Oecd (2004) Economic aspects of extended producer responsibility. Paris: OECD.
10.
Oecd (2005) Analytical framework for evaluating the costs and benefits of extended producer responsibility programmes. Paris: OECD.
11.
Ongodo F., Williams I. and Cherett T. ( 2011) How are WEEE doing? A global view of the management of electrical and electronic wastes. Waste Management31: 714-730.
12.
Quinn L. and Sinclair A. ( 2006) Policy challenges to implement extended producer responsibility for packaging. Canadian Public Administration49: 60-79.
13.
Rotter V., Schill W. and Chancerel P. ( 2009) Implementing individual producer responsibility (IPR) under the European WEEE directive - experiences in Germany. In: 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology . ISSST, Tempe, AZ, USA. 18-20 May 2009. 1-6, IEEE Computer Society: Washington, DC, USA.
14.
Sinn H-W. ( 2008) Das grüne Paradoxon: Warum man das Angebot bei der Klimapolitik nicht vergessen darf. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik9(special issue): 109-142.
15.
Stevens C. ( 2004) Extended producer responsibility and innovation. In: Economic Aspects of Extended Producer Responsibility, Part 3, Ch. 1. Paris: OECD.
16.
Walls M. ( 2004) EPR policy goals and policy choices: what does economics tell us. In: Economic Aspects of Extended Producer Responsibility, Part 1, Ch. 1. Paris: OECD.
17.
Walls M. ( 2006) Extended producer responsibility and product design: economic theory and selected case studies. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, discussion paper.
18.
Wiesmeth H. ( 2002) Umweltökonomie: Theorie und Praxis im Gleichgewicht . Berlin: Springer.
19.
Yu J., Hills P. and Welford R. ( 2008) Extended producer responsibility and eco-design changes: Perspectives from China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management15: 11-124. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/csr.168/pdf (accessed June 2011).
20.
Zoeteman B., Krikke H. and Venselaar J. ( 2010) Handling WEEE waste flows: on the effectiveness of producer responsibility in a globalizing world. Int J Adv Manuf Technol47: 415-436.
