A former radioactive waste disposal site is surveyed with two non-intrusive geophysical techniques, including magnetic gradiometry and electromagnetic induction. Data were gathered over the site by towing the geophysical equipment mounted to a non-electrically conductive and non-magnetic fibre-glass cart. Magnetic gradiometry, which detects the location of ferromagnetic material, including iron and steel, was used to map the existence of a previously unknown buried pipeline formerly used in the delivery of liquid waste to a number of surface disposal trenches and concrete vaults. The existence of a possible pipeline is reinforced by historical engineering drawing and photographs. The electromagnetic induction (EMI) technique was used to map areas of high and low electrical conductivity, which coincide with the magnetic gradiometry data. The EMI also provided information on areas of high electrical conductivity unrelated to a pipeline network. Both data sets demonstrate the usefulness of surface geophysical surveillance techniques to minimize the risk of exposure in the event of future remediation efforts.
Cometto, M., Wydler, P. & Chawla, R. ( 2004) A comparative physics study of alternative longterm strategies for closure of the nuclear fuel cycle. Annals of Nuclear Energy , 31, 413-429.
2.
Doll, W.E., Nyquist, J.E., Beard, L.P. & Gamey, T.J. ( 2000) Airborne geophysical surveying for hazardous waste site characterization on the Oak Ridge Reservation, Tennessee. Geophysics, 65, 1372-1387.
3.
Gephart, R.E. ( 2003) Hanford, A conversation about nuclear waste and cleanup . Battelle Press, Richland WA.
4.
Gibb, F.G.F. ( 1999) High-temperature, very deep, geological disposal: a safer alternative for high-level radioactive waste?Waste Management , 19, 207-221.
5.
Guillen, D.P. & Hertzog, R.C. ( 2004) A survey of Department of Energy- sponsored geophysical research for shallow waste site characterization. Vadose Zone Journal, 3, 122-133.
6.
Huang, H. & Won, I.J. ( 2000) Conductivity and susceptibility mapping using broadband electromagnetic sensors. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 5, 31-41.
7.
Huang, H. & Won, I.J. ( 2004) Electromagnetic detection of buried metallic objects using quad-quad conductivity. Geophysics, 69, 1387-1393.
8.
Hylko, J.M., Brennan, W.P. & Setlur, A.V. ( 1989) Status of interim spent fuel storage technologies at commercial nuclear power plants. Nuclear Plant Journal, 7, 1-4.
9.
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). ( 1994) Siting of geological disposal facilities, Safety Series No. 111-G-4.1. Vienna, Austria.
10.
Joussein, E., Kruyts, N.Righi, D.Petit, S. & Delvaux, B. ( 2004) Specific retention of radiocesium in volcanic ash soils devoid of micaceous clay minerals. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 68, 313-319.
11.
Lennemann, W.L., Parker, H.E. & West, P.J. ( 1976) Management of radioactive wastes. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 3, 285-295.
12.
McDonald, K.M. ( 1999) Transuranic (TRU) Waste Phase I Retrieval Plan. HNF-4781. Flour Daniel Hanford, Inc. Report to theUS Department of Energy. Richland, WA.
13.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development/Nuclear Energy Agency (OECD/NEA). (1995) The environmental and ethical basis of geologic disposal. A collective opinion of the NEA Radioactive Waste Management Committee. Paris, France.
14.
Poston, T.M.,Hanf, R.W. & Dirkes, R.L. (eds) (2000) Hanford Site Environmental Report for Calendar Year 1999. PNNL-13230, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory , Richland, WA.
15.
Rameback, H., Albinsson, Y., Skalberg, M., Eklund, U.B., Kjellberg, L. & Werme, L. ( 2000) Transport and leaching of technetium and uranium from spent UO2 fuel in compacted bentonite clay. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 277, 288-294.
16.
Rucker, D.F. & Sweeney, M.D. ( 2004) Plume Delineation in the BC Cribs and Trenches Area. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, PNNL-14948. Richland, WA .
17.
Rucker, D.F. & Fink, J.B. ( 2007) Inorganic plume delineation using surface high resolution electrical resistivity at the BC cribs and trenches site, Hanford. Vadose Zone Journal, 6, 946-958.
18.
Rucker, D.F., Levitt, M.T. & Greenwood, W.J.(2009) Three-dimensional electrical resistivity model of a nuclear waste disposal site. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 69, 150-164.
19.
Rucker, D.F., Loke, M.H., Noonan, G.E. & Levitt, M.T. ( 2010) Electrical resistivity characterization of an industrial site using long electrodes. Geophysics, in press.
20.
Sheriff, R.E. ( 2002) Encyclopedic dictionary of applied geophysics, 4th edn . Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, OK. 429p.
21.
Siegrist, R.L. & Hargett, D.L. ( 1989) Application of surface geophysics for location of buried hazardous wastes. Waste Management & Research, 7, 325-335.
U.S. Department of Energy-Richland Operations (DOE-RL). ( 1998) Groundwater/Vadose Zone Integration Project Background Information and State of Knowledge. DOE/RL-98-48 vol. II Rev. 0, Richland, WA.
24.
Ward, A.L., Gee, G.W., Zhang, Z.F. & Keller, J.M. ( 2004) Vadose Zone Contaminant Fate-and-Transport Analysis for the 216-B-26 Trench. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, PNNL-14907. Richland, WA.
25.
Ward, S.H. ( 1990) Geotechnical and Environmental Geophysics, Volume 2: Environmental and Groundwater. Investigations in Geophysics, 5. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, OK. 343p.
26.
Ward, S.H. & Hohmann, G.W. ( 1988) Electromagnetic theory for geophysical applications. In: Nabighian, M.N. (ed) Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics. Investigations in Geophysics, 3. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, OK. 513p.
