This paper reports on the potential to apply the choice experiment method to understand the public’s preferences for solid waste management programmes in Macao. A random sample survey of 260 respondents in Macao was conducted during the summer in 2004. The survey data was analysed using conditional multinomial logit models. The study results indicate that Macao residents prefer: (1) waste segregation and recycling at source; (2) noise reduction during waste collection and transportation and (3) lower garbage fees. The study concludes that choice experiment is a reliable tool in the analysis of respondents’ preferences for developing a suitable solid waste management programme in Macao.
Adamowicz, W. , Louviere, J. & Williams, M. (1994) Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities . Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26, 271-292 .
2.
Adamowicz, W. , Boxall, P. , Williams, M. & Louviere, J. (1998) Stated preferences approaches to measuring passive use values . American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80, 64-75 .
3.
Anaman Kwabena A. & Jair Rashidah M. , 2000Contingent valuation of solid waste collection services for rural households in Brunei Darussalam . The Singapore Economic Review, 45(2), 223-240 .
4.
Bai R. & Mardina S. (2002) The practice and challenges of solid waste management in Singapore . Waste Management, 22, 557-567 .
5.
Bergmann, A. , Hanley, N. & Wright R. (2006) Valuing the attributes of renewable energy investments . Energy Policy, 34, 1004-1014 .
6.
Boxall, P. C. , Adamowicz W. L. , Joffre S. , Williams M. & Louviere J. (1996) A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation . Ecological Economics, 18, 243-253 .
7.
Carlsson, F. & Martinsson, P. (2001) Do hypothetical and actual marginal willingness to pay differ in choice experiments?Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 41, 179-192 .
8.
Carlsson, F. , Frykblom, P. & Liljenstolpe C. (2003) Valuing wetland attributes: an application of choice experiments . Ecological Economics, 47, 95-103 .
9.
Castillo, N. H. & Pitfield, D. E. (2002) Factors affecting the adoption of natural gas vehicles by UK road freight operations . Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. Municipal Engineer, 151(1), 83-90 .
10.
Christie, M. , Hanley, N. , Warren, J. , Hyde, A. , Murphy K. & Wright R. (2004) A valuation of biodiversity in the UK using choice experiments and contingent valuation . In Proceedings of Applied Environmental Economics Conference, 26 March, The Royal Society, London.
11.
Colombo, S. , Calatrava-Requena, J. & Hanley, N. (2006) Analysing the social benefits of soil conservation measures using stated preference methods . Ecological Economics, 58, 850-861 .
12.
Foo, T. S. (1997) Recycling of domestic waste: early experiences in Singapore . Habitat International, 21, 277-289 .
13.
Garrod, G. & Willis, K. (1998) Estimating lost amenity due to landfill waste disposal . Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 22, 83-95 .
14.
Greene, W. H. (2000) Econometric Analysis. Prentice Hall International, Co., London, UK .
15.
Greene, W. H. (2002) LIMDEP Version 8.0. Econometric Software Inc. Plainview, New York, USA .
16.
Hanley, N. , Wright, R. & Adamowicz, W. (1998a) Using choice experiments to value the environment . Environmental Resource Economics, 11, 413-428 .
17.
Hanley, N. , MacMillan, D. , Wright, R. E. , Bullock, C. , et al. (1998b) Contingent valuation versus choice experiments: Estimating the benefits of environmentally sensitive areas in Scotland . Journal of Agricultural Economics, 49(1), 1-15 .
18.
Hanley, N. , Robert, E. W. & Koop, G. (2002) Modelling recreation demand using choice experiments: climbing in Scotland . Environmental Resource Economics, 22, 449-466 .
19.
Hanley, N. , Wright, R. & Alvarez-Farizo, B. (2006) Estimating the economic value of improvements in river ecology using choice experiments: an application to the water framework directive . Journal of Environmental Management, 78, 183-193 .
20.
Lancaster, K. (1966) A new approach to consumer theory . Journal of Political Economy, 84, 132-157 .
21.
Louviere, J. J. , Hensher, D. A. & Swat, J. D. (2000) Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA .
22.
McFadden, D. (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In: Zarembka, P. (ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics. Academic Press, New York, USA ..
23.
McIntosh E. & Ryan M. (2002) Using discrete choice experiments to derive welfare estimates for the provision of elective surgery: implications of discontinuous preferences . Journal of Economic Psychology, 23, 367-382 .
24.
Mitchell, R. C. & Carson, R. T. (1989) Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future, Washington DC .
25.
Morrison, M. , Bennett, JW. , Blamey, R. & Louviere, J. (2002) Choice modelling and tests of benefit transfer . American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84, 161-170 .
26.
Morrison, M. , Bennett, J. W. & Blamey, R. K. (1999) Valuing improved wet-land quality using choice modeling . Water Resources Research, 35(9), 2805-2814 .
27.
Natter, M. & Feurstein, M. (2001) Real world performance of choice-based conjoint models . European Journal of Operational Research, 137, 448-458 .
28.
Rolfe, J. , Bennett, J. & Louviere, J. (2000) Choice modelling and its potential application to tropical rainforest preservation , Ecological Economics, 35, 289-302
29.
Sasao, T. (2004) An estimation of the social costs of landfill siting using a choice experiment . Waste Management, 24, 753-762 .
30.
Statistics and Census Department (2000) Yearbook of Statistics. Statistics and Census Department, Macao .
31.
Statistics and Census Department (2003a) Environmental Statistics. Statistics and Census Department, Macao .
32.
Statistics and Census Department (2003b) Yearbook of Statistics. Statistics and Census Department, Macao .
33.
Streever, W. J. , Callaghan-Perry, M. , Searles, A. , Stevens, T. & Svoboda, P. (1998) Public attitudes and values for wetland conservation in New South Wales, Australia . Journal Environmental Economics Management, 54, 1-14 .
34.
Wattage, P. , Mardle, S. & Pascoe, S. (2005) Evaluation of the importance of fisheries management objectives using choice-experiments . Ecological Economics, 55, 85-95 .
