Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This paper describes a methodology for estimating the true internal costs of construction waste, aimed at promoting environmentally friendly waste management. The study employs cost–benefit analysis, contribution margin analysis, the polluterpays principle and a mathematical model: the model for Efficient Use of Resources for Optimal Production Economy (EUROPE), which has been introduced previously by the author for assigning industrial costs to waste. The calculations are performed on construction waste created in a case study of a building project. Moreover, waste is regarded as, in a business sense, having the same basic status as any normal industrial product, namely the ‘equality principle’. Application of the methodology is suggested to create incentives for environmental and profitability improvement in construction companies and other types of industrial sectors. The results of the case study show the generation of construction waste to substantially decrease the final operating income, due to the internal shadow price cost it creates. This paper is intended to reduce the gap between the choice of waste management procedures and their economic impact, the overall objective being to accomplish an improved industrial environmental situation.

Keywords

Construction waste management industrial economic models cost–benefit analysis true internal costs wmr 759–4

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Appelgren, M. (2001): Byggsopor blir en kostnadsbomb i Stockholm, (Construction waste will be a cost bomb in Stockholm) . Byggindustrin, 2001, 27, (in Swedish).

European Commission (EC) (2002): Environment 2010: Our Future, Our Choice. The Sixth Environment Action Programme of the European Community 2001–2010. Home page http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/newprg/index.htm

European Environment Agency (EEA) (2003): 2003, Europe's Environment: the Third Assessment. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg , pp. 151–164.

Frenckner, P. & Samuelson, L.A. (1989): Produktkalkyler i industrin, (Product Estimation in Industry). Mekanförbundets Förlag, Stockholm, Sweden , pp. 191–193.

Gerdin, J. (1995): ABC-kalkylering,(Activity Based Costing). Studentlitteratur, Lund, Sweden , p. 105-105, (in Swedish).

Johnson, H.T. & Kaplan, R.S. (1987): Relevance Lost. The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA , p. 243-243.

Nilsson, K. (1997): Strategiska vändpunkter i den svenska avfallshanteringen under de senaste 50 åren, (Strategic turning points in Swedish waste management during the last 50 years). In: RVF – 50 år i svensk renhållning, (RVF – 50 years in Swedish waste management). RVF, Malmö, Sweden, pp. 31–41, (in Swedish).

OECD Environment Directorate (1992): The Polluter-Pays Principle. OECD Analyses and Recommendations. OECD, Paris, France , pp. 5–6.

Stenis, J. (2002): Industrial Waste Management Models – A Theoretical Approach. Licentiate dissertation. Department of Construction and Architecture, Division of Construction Management, Lund Institute of Technology, Lund University, Sweden, KFS AB, p. 104.

10.

United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) (1992): Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro. UNCED, ch. 21, New York.

11.

Wallström, M. (2001): Future directions for European waste policy (European Waste Forum, Brussels, 21 June). In: Evolution of Prevention in the European Union. Proceedings of the VI European Forum on Resource and Waste Management(Valencia, Spain, 6–7 June 2002), Vogel, G. (ed) The European waste club, Madrid, Spain .

Construction waste management based on industrial management models: a Swedish case study

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References