The efficiencies of four different waste collection methods were compared by modelling the collection of source-separated household waste in the Helsinki region, Finland. Efficiency was assessed on the basis of system costs, fuel consumption, working hours and recovery rates. The study included paper, biowaste, energy waste and mixed waste produced in households.
Both separation of new types of recyclables and increasing the coverage of separate collection increased the costs of household waste collection independently of the collection method studied. Methods in which several types of waste are collected simultaneously increased the efficiency of waste collection. High participation rates and separation efficiencies reduced the costs of waste collection.
Everett, J.W. & Shahi, S. (1996a) Curbside collection of yard waste: I. Estimating route time. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 122:2, 107-114.
2.
Everett, J.W. & Shahi, S. (1996b) Curbside collection of yard waste: II. Simulation and Application. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 122:2, 115-121.
3.
Everett, J.W. & Shahi, S. (1997) Vehicle and labour requirements for yard waste collection. Waste Management & Research, 15:6, 627-640.
4.
Everett, J.W. (1999) Improving curbside collection of recyclables through simulation modeling. In: Barrage, A. & Edelmann, X. (eds.) Collected papers of the R'99 World Congress, Volume III, Logistics: Network Identification & Separation, Mechanical Recycling, Product Design, Ecodesign Innovation. Geneva. EMPA. p. III.24-III.29.
5.
Kaila, J. (1998) Empirical data and statistics about waste management in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area. Written notification. The Helsinki Metropolitan Area Council.Helsinki, Finland.
6.
Koljonen, S. (1998) Statistical data about waste management in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area. Written notification. Novo Group Plc.Helsinki, Finland.
7.
Koljonen, S. (1996) Statistical data about the residential properties in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area. Written notification. Novo Group Plc.Helsinki, Finland.
8.
Ministry of the Environment, Finland. (1998) Valtakunnallinen jätesuunnitelma vuoteen 2005 (The nati-onal waste plan until 2005). The Finnish Environment 260. Helsinki, Finland.
9.
Molok Oy. (1998) Data about the large container method. Written notification. Helsinki, Finland.
10.
Mynttinen, M. (1998) The number of inhabitants in the municipalities in which recoverable types of waste are separated. Written notification. 18.3.1998. The Association of Finnish Local and Regional Authorities.
11.
Mäkelä, K., Anila, M. & Kallio, M. (1996) Raskaiden ajoneuvojen ajosyklit ja energiankulutus. Tavaraautot. (Driving cycles and energy consumption of heavy vehicles). VTT Communities and Infrastructure research report 392. Espoo, Finland.
12.
Nieminen, H. & Isoaho, S. (1995) Kotitalousjätteen keräys ja kuljetus (Collection and transport of household waste). Publication of the Water and Environment Administration - series A 209. National Board of Waters and the Environment. Helsinki, Finland.
13.
Rajala, P. (1998) The costs and fuel consumption of hauler of waste collection vehicle. Oral notification. Partek. Helsinki, Finland.
14.
RIL. (1983) Jätehuolto: Yhdyskuntajätteen keräily ja kuljetus (Waste management: Collection and transportation of municipal solid waste). RIL 152-1983, Association of Finnish Civil Engineers. Helsinki, Finland.
15.
Somero, P. (1998) The cost of multi-compartment collection vehicle. Oral notification. Sita Finland. Helsinki, Finland.
16.
Talvio, J. (1998) Empirical data about waste management in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area. Written notification. The Helsinki Metropolitan Area Council. Helsinki, Finland.
17.
Tanskanen, J-H. (2000) Strategic planning of municipal solid waste management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling30:7, 111-133
18.
Tanskanen, J-H., Reinikainen, A., & Melanen, M. (1998) Waste streams, costs and emissions in municipal solid waste management: A case study from Finland. Waste Management & Research16:6, 503-513.
19.
Tanskanen, J-H. (1997a) Valtakunnallisten yhdyskuntajätteen hyödyntämistavoitteiden saavutettavuus Päijät-Hämeessä (Means to reach national recovery rate targets for municipal solid waste in the Päijät-Häme region). The Finnish Environment 151. Helsinki, Finland.
20.
Tanskanen, J-H. (1997b) YTV: n alueen jätehuollon mallintaminen (Modeling municipal solid waste management in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area). Series C1997:2, Helsinki Metropolitan Area Council, Helsinki, Finland.
21.
Teir, J. (1998) The cost of optical sorting plant. Oral notification. Avecon. Vaasa, Finland.
22.
YTV. (1996) Yleiset jätehuoltomääräykset (General regulations about waste management in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area). Helsinki, Finland.
