Acker, J. R.
(1996). The death penalty: A 25-year retrospective and a perspective on the future. Criminal Justice Review, 21, 139-160.
2.
Acker, J. R.
, & Lanier, C. S. (1998). Beyond human ability? The rise and fall of death penalty legislation. In J. R. Acker, R. M. Bohm, & C. S. Lanier (Eds.), America's experiment with capital punishment: Reflections on the past, present, and future of the ultimate penal sanction (pp. 77-115). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
3.
Acker, J. R.
, & Lanier, C. S. (1999). Ready for the defense? Legislative provisions governing the appointment of counsel in capital cases. Criminal Law Bulletin, 35, 429-477.
4.
American Bar Association Section of Individual Rights and Responsibilities
. (1998). Refocusing the death penalty discussion in America: Impact of the American Bar Association call for a moratorium on executions. Washington, DC: Author.
5.
Baldus, D. C.
, Woodworth, G., Zuckerman, D., Weiner, N. A., & Broffitt, B. (1998). Racial discrimination in the post-Furman era: An empirical and legal overview, with recent findings from Philadelphia. Cornell Law Review, 83, 1638-1770.
6.
Bandes, S.
(1996). Simple murder: A comment on the legality of executing the innocent. Buffalo Law Review, 44, 501-525.
7.
Bedau, H. A.
(Ed.). (1982). The death penalty in America (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
8.
Bedau, H. A.
(1987). Death is different: Studies in the morality, law, and politics of capital punishment. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
9.
Bedau, H. A.
(1990). Imprisonment vs. death: Does avoiding Schwarzschild's paradox lead to Sheleff's dilemma?Albany Law Review, 54, 481-495.
10.
Bedau, H. A.
(Ed.). (1997). The death penalty in America: Current controversies. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
11.
Bedau, H. A.
, & Radelet, M. L. (1987). Miscarriages of justice in potentially capital cases. Stanford Law Review, 40, 21-179.
12.
Bienen, L. B.
(1998). The quality of justice in capital cases: Illinois as a case study. Law and Contemporary Problems, 61(4), 193-217.
13.
Bilionis, L. D.
(1998). Eighth Amendment meanings from the ABA's moratorium resolution. Law and Contemporary Problems, 61(4), 29-54.
14.
Bilionis, L. D.
, & Rosen, R. A. (1997). Lawyers, arbitrariness, and the Eighth Amendment. Texas Law Review, 75, 1301-1371.
15.
Blume, J. H.
, Eisenberg, T., & Johnson, S. L. (1998). Post-McCleskey racial discrimination claims in capital cases. Cornell Law Review, 83, 1771-1810.
16.
Bohm, R. M.
(1998a). American death penalty opinion: Past, present, and future. In J. R. Acker, R. M. Bohm, & C. S. Lanier (Eds.), America's experiment with capital punishment: Reflections on the past, present, and future of the ultimate penal sanction (pp. 25-46). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
17.
Bohm, R. M.
(1998b). The economic costs of capital punishment: Past, present, and future. In J. R. Acker, R. M. Bohm, & C. S. Lanier (Eds.), America's experiment with capital punishment: Reflections on the past, present, and future of the ultimate penal sanction (pp. 437-458). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
18.
Bowers, W. J.
(1995). The capital jury project: Rationale, design, and preview of early findings. Indiana Law Journal, 70, 1043-1102.
19.
Bowers, W. J.
, Sandys, M., & Steiner, B. D. (1998). Foreclosed impartiality in capital sentencing: Jurors' predispositions, guilt-trial experience, and premature decision making. Cornell Law Review, 83, 1476-1556.
20.
Bowers, W. J.
, Vandiver, M., & Dugan, P. H. (1994). A new look at public opinion on capital punishment: What citizens and legislators prefer. American Journal of Criminal Law, 22, 77-150.
21.
Bright, S. B.
(1994). Counsel for the poor: The death sentence not for the worst crime but for the worst lawyer. Yale Law Journal, 103, 1835-1883.
22.
Bright, S. B.
(1996). The death penalty as the answer to crime: Costly, counterproductive and corrupting. Santa Clara Law Review, 36, 1069-1096.
23.
Bright, S. B.
(1998). The politics of capital punishment: The sacrifice of fairness for executions. In J. R. Acker, R. M. Bohm, & C. S. Lanier (Eds.), America's experiment with capital punishment: Reflections on the past, present, and future of the ultimate penal sanction (pp. 117-135). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
24.
Callins v. Collins, 510 U.S. 1141 (1994).
25.
Coker v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 584 (1977).
26.
Costanzo, M.
(1997). Just revenge: Costs and consequences of the death penalty. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.
27.
Costanzo, M.
, & Costanzo, S. (1992). Jury decision making in the capital penalty phase: Legal assumptions, empirical findings, and a research agenda. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 185-202.
28.
Costanzo, M.
, & Costanzo, S. (1994). Life or death decisions: An analysis of capital jury decision-making under the special issues sentencing framework. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 151-170.
29.
Costanzo, M.
, & Peterson, J. (1994). Attorney persuasion in the capital penalty phase: A content analysis of closing arguments. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 125-148.
30.
Death Penalty Information Center. (2000a). [On-line]. Available http://www.essential.org/dpic/dpicreg.html.
31.
Death Penalty Information Center. (2000b). [On-line]. Available http://www.essential.org/dpic/Innocentlist.html.
32.
Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972).
33.
Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976).
34.
Gross, S. R.
(1996). The risks of death: Why erroneous convictions are common in capital cases. Buffalo Law Review, 44, 469-500.
35.
Gross, S. R.
(1998a). Lost lives: Miscarriages of justice in capital cases. Law and Contemporary Problems, 61(4), 125-152.
36.
Gross, S. R.
(1998b). Update: American public opinion on the death penalty-it's getting personal. Cornell Law Review, 83, 1448-1475.
37.
Hood, R.
(1996). The death penalty: A world-wide perspective. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
38.
Luginbuhl, J.
, & Howe, J. (1995). Discretion in capital sentencing instructions: Guided or misguided?Indiana Law Journal, 70, 1161-1181.
39.
Maguire, K.
, & Pastore, A. L. (Eds.). (1999). Bureau of Justice Statistics: Sourcebook of criminal justice statistics-1998. Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice.
40.
Markman, S. J.
, & Cassell, P. G. (1988). Protecting the innocent: A response to the Bedau-Radelet study. Stanford Law Review, 41, 121-160.
41.
McCleskey v. Kemp, 481 U.S. 279 (1987).
42.
McFeely, W. S.
(1981). Grant: A biography. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Co.
43.
Mello, M.
(1990-1991). On metaphors, mirrors, and murders: Theodore Bundy and the rule of law. New York University Review of Law & Social Change, 18, 887-938.
44.
Mello, M. A.
(1997). Dead wrong: A death row lawyer speaks out against capital punishment. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.
45.
Meltsner, M.
(1973). Cruel and unusual: The Supreme Court and capital punishment. New York, NY: Random House.
46.
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.
(1999, Fall). Death row, U.S.A. Unpublished monograph.
47.
Patemoster, R.
(1991). Capital punishment in America. New York, NY: Lexington Books.
48.
Pierce, G. L.
, & Radelet, M. L. (1990-1991). The role and consequences of the death penalty in American politics. New York University Review of Law & Social Change, 18, 711-728.
49.
Radelet, M. L.
, Bedau, H. A., & Putnam, C. E. (1992). In spite of innocence: Erroneous convictions in capital cases. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
50.
Radelet, M. L.
, Lofquist, W. S., & Bedau, H. A. (1996). Prisoners released from death rows since 1970 because of doubts about their guilt. Thomas M Cooley Law Review, 13, 907-966.
51.
Sarat, A.
(1998). Recapturing the spirit of Furman: The American Bar Association and the new abolitionist politics. Law and Contemporary Problems, 61(4), 5-28.
52.
Spangenberg, R. L.
, & Walsh, E. R. (1989). Capital punishment or life imprisonment? Some cost considerations. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 23, 45-58.
53.
Tabak, R. J.
, & Lane, J. M. (1989). The execution of injustice: A cost and lack-of-benefit analysis of the death penalty. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 23, 59-146.
54.
van den Haag, E.
, & Conrad, J. P. (1983). The death penalty: A debate. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
55.
Vick, D. W.
(1995). Poorhouse justice: Underfunded indigent defense services and arbitrary death sentences. Buffalo Law Review, 43, 329-460.
56.
von Drehle, D.
(1995). Among the lowest of the dead: The culture of death row. New York, NY: Times Books.
57.
Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280 (1976).
58.
Yackle, L. W.
(1998). The American Bar Association and federal habeas corpus. Law and Contemporary Problems, 61(4), 171-192.
59.
Zimring, F. E.
, & Hawkins, G. (1986). Capital punishment and the American agenda. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
